Minnesota/23 July 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
|'''[[Minnesota/22 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 22)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/24 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 24)]]'''
|'''[[Minnesota/22 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 22)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/24 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 24)]]'''
|}
|}
-
<br>
+
'''Patrick'''<br>
 +
Today I got back the results for test3, and also created tow programs to test whether making tetR2 less attracted to aTc would make a significant difference. I created two programs, '''smad_ttn_test4''' which looked at reducing tetR2:aTc production (the kinetic constant for reactions 11 and 13 were reduced from 1E+08 1/(Ms) to 1E+07 1/(Ms)), and '''smad_ttn_test5''' which further reduced the same constant to 1E+06 1/(Ms).<br>
 +
 
 +
Test3 came back and it show below along with the base for comparison. Test3 checked to see what would occur if tetR2:aTc and tetR2:aTc2 were set to Split on Division:<br>
 +
<center><gallery widths=300 heights=200>
 +
Image:base.jpg|Figure 1 - Base TTN Model
 +
Image:test3.jpg|Figure 2 - tetR2:aTc and tetR2:aTc2 Split on Division
 +
</gallery></center>
 +
 
 +
As can be seen it has dramatic, but ultimately incorrect results. The results are a by-product of aTc dilution instead of tetR2 dilution as desired. I'll have to look at more ideas for how to model this correctly.<br>
 +
 
 +
'''Ben'''<br>
[[Image:Tnnnew24.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>
[[Image:Tnnnew24.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>
<br>
<br>
[[Image:Tnnnew26.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>
[[Image:Tnnnew26.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>

Latest revision as of 20:11, 30 July 2009

Back to Notebook Home
Go to Previous Day (July 22)Go to Next Day (July 24)

Patrick
Today I got back the results for test3, and also created tow programs to test whether making tetR2 less attracted to aTc would make a significant difference. I created two programs, smad_ttn_test4 which looked at reducing tetR2:aTc production (the kinetic constant for reactions 11 and 13 were reduced from 1E+08 1/(Ms) to 1E+07 1/(Ms)), and smad_ttn_test5 which further reduced the same constant to 1E+06 1/(Ms).

Test3 came back and it show below along with the base for comparison. Test3 checked to see what would occur if tetR2:aTc and tetR2:aTc2 were set to Split on Division:

As can be seen it has dramatic, but ultimately incorrect results. The results are a by-product of aTc dilution instead of tetR2 dilution as desired. I'll have to look at more ideas for how to model this correctly.

Ben
Tnnnew24.jpgTnnexperiment.jpg

Tnnnew26.jpgTnnexperiment.jpg