Minnesota/25 June 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 21: Line 21:
<br>
<br>
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky5.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky5.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>
 +
<br>
 +
This model does indeed show some different leakiness, which is definitely a good thing, although the leakiness is still too high for an accurate model. Still, the problem remains where the model peaks and decreases instead of reaching a steady state.

Revision as of 21:03, 30 July 2009

Back to Notebook Home
Go to Previous Day (June 24)Go to Next Day (June 26)

In order to try to improve the model, the following reaction constants were changed to try to see less leakiness in the model.

Reaction Forward Kinetic Constant Reverse Kinetic Constant
RNAp + tetO1:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR21200000
RNAp + tetO1:aTc:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR21200000
RNAp + tetO1:aTc2:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR21200000


Tnnatcvariesleaky5.jpgTnnexperiment.jpg

This model does indeed show some different leakiness, which is definitely a good thing, although the leakiness is still too high for an accurate model. Still, the problem remains where the model peaks and decreases instead of reaching a steady state.