Minnesota/26 June 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
|'''[[Minnesota/25 June 2009|Go to Previous Day (June 25)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/29 June 2009|Go to Next Day (June 29)]]'''
|'''[[Minnesota/25 June 2009|Go to Previous Day (June 25)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/29 June 2009|Go to Next Day (June 29)]]'''
|}
|}
 +
'''Patrick'''<br>
 +
I got back the analysis of '''tetRu/d''' which looked at the effects of increasing or decreasing the rate of synthesis of tetR2 (reaction 44, k = 1E-11 M/s initially) by an order of magnitude). Here are the results along with the base model for comparison:<br>
 +
 +
<center><gallery widths=250 heights=200>
 +
Image:badBase.jpg|Figure 1 - Base TTN Model
 +
Image:badTetRu.jpg|Figure 2 - Increased TetR2 Synthesis
 +
Image:badTetRd.jpg|Figure 3 - Decreased TetR2 Synthesis
 +
</gallery></center><br>
 +
 +
These results look more promising as they shift the "hump" dramatically. The "hump" is an issue though since GFP production should reach steady state in 9 hours.<br>
 +
 +
'''Ben'''<br>
This model (tnn_atcvaries7_leaky) was an attempt to see what would happen if the kinetic constant was decreased for the three reactions shown below, instead of increased like the previous day's.  
This model (tnn_atcvaries7_leaky) was an attempt to see what would happen if the kinetic constant was decreased for the three reactions shown below, instead of increased like the previous day's.  
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" border = "1"
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" border = "1"
Line 21: Line 33:
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky7.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky7.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>
<br>
<br>
-
The result was fairly predictable. Instead of making the model less leaky like the previous days, it increased the leakiness shown by the model. This direction is making the model worse, and so it will not be pursued in the future.
+
The result of this change was quite interesting. The curve at aTc = 0 remained constant, while the entire rest of the model has been lowered. This precisely the opposite of what is needed for the model unfortunately. This direction will probably not be pursued in the future as it is not helping solve the porblems seen in the model.

Latest revision as of 22:08, 30 July 2009

Back to Notebook Home
Go to Previous Day (June 25)Go to Next Day (June 29)

Patrick
I got back the analysis of tetRu/d which looked at the effects of increasing or decreasing the rate of synthesis of tetR2 (reaction 44, k = 1E-11 M/s initially) by an order of magnitude). Here are the results along with the base model for comparison:


These results look more promising as they shift the "hump" dramatically. The "hump" is an issue though since GFP production should reach steady state in 9 hours.

Ben
This model (tnn_atcvaries7_leaky) was an attempt to see what would happen if the kinetic constant was decreased for the three reactions shown below, instead of increased like the previous day's.

Reaction Forward Kinetic Constant Reverse Kinetic Constant
RNAp + tetO1:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR231000
RNAp + tetO1:aTc:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR231000
RNAp + tetO1:aTc2:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR231000


Tnnatcvariesleaky7.jpgTnnexperiment.jpg

The result of this change was quite interesting. The curve at aTc = 0 remained constant, while the entire rest of the model has been lowered. This precisely the opposite of what is needed for the model unfortunately. This direction will probably not be pursued in the future as it is not helping solve the porblems seen in the model.