Minnesota/8 July 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {|style="align:left" width="965" |- |''' Back to Notebook Home''' |- |'''Go to Previous Day (July 7)'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/9 ...)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
|'''[[Minnesota/7 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 7)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/9 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 9)]]'''
|'''[[Minnesota/7 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 7)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/9 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 9)]]'''
|}
|}
 +
'''Patrick'''<br>
 +
Today I looked at changing the decomposition rate of GFP to see if that affected the amount of GFP significantly.<br>
 +
 +
'''smad_ttn_gfp_u/d''' - These two models simply looked at changing the gfp decomposition (i.e. gfp -->, reaction 10) from 3.21E-05 1/s by orders of magnitude (gfp_u k=3.21E-04 1/s, gfp_d k=3.21E-06 1/s).<br>
 +
 +
'''smad_ttn_gfp_d2''' - This third model looked at eliminating gfp decomposition completely (k = 0 for reaction 10).<br>
 +
 +
'''Ben'''<br>
 +
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky23.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br>

Latest revision as of 18:59, 30 July 2009

Back to Notebook Home
Go to Previous Day (July 7)Go to Next Day (July 9)

Patrick
Today I looked at changing the decomposition rate of GFP to see if that affected the amount of GFP significantly.

smad_ttn_gfp_u/d - These two models simply looked at changing the gfp decomposition (i.e. gfp -->, reaction 10) from 3.21E-05 1/s by orders of magnitude (gfp_u k=3.21E-04 1/s, gfp_d k=3.21E-06 1/s).

smad_ttn_gfp_d2 - This third model looked at eliminating gfp decomposition completely (k = 0 for reaction 10).

Ben
Tnnatcvariesleaky23.jpgTnnexperiment.jpg