# Minnesota/8 July 2009

(Difference between revisions)
 Revision as of 19:35, 29 July 2009 (view source)Bswiniar (Talk | contribs)← Older edit Latest revision as of 18:59, 30 July 2009 (view source)Patsmad (Talk | contribs) Line 5: Line 5: |'''[[Minnesota/7 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 7)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/9 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 9)]]''' |'''[[Minnesota/7 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 7)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/9 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 9)]]''' |} |} -
+ '''Patrick'''
+ Today I looked at changing the decomposition rate of GFP to see if that affected the amount of GFP significantly.
+ + '''smad_ttn_gfp_u/d''' - These two models simply looked at changing the gfp decomposition (i.e. gfp -->, reaction 10) from 3.21E-05 1/s by orders of magnitude (gfp_u k=3.21E-04 1/s, gfp_d k=3.21E-06 1/s).
+ + '''smad_ttn_gfp_d2''' - This third model looked at eliminating gfp decomposition completely (k = 0 for reaction 10).
+ + '''Ben'''
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky23.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky23.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]

## Latest revision as of 18:59, 30 July 2009

Patrick
Today I looked at changing the decomposition rate of GFP to see if that affected the amount of GFP significantly.

smad_ttn_gfp_u/d - These two models simply looked at changing the gfp decomposition (i.e. gfp -->, reaction 10) from 3.21E-05 1/s by orders of magnitude (gfp_u k=3.21E-04 1/s, gfp_d k=3.21E-06 1/s).

smad_ttn_gfp_d2 - This third model looked at eliminating gfp decomposition completely (k = 0 for reaction 10).

Ben