Team:Alberta/Project/Gene Selection

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 56: Line 56:
<font size="2">
<font size="2">
<P>
<P>
-
Four essential gene lists from the literature were analyzed to construct a preliminary essential gene list </P>
+
There were four primary literature sources which were used for the determination of the essential genome.  These genes were analyzed to construct a preliminary essential gene list </P>
<TABLE BORDER>
<TABLE BORDER>
Line 97: Line 97:
-
<P>These literature lists vary greatly in size and have minimal overlap. </P>
+
<P>Each gene list was determined in a variety of ways and there results show very little consistency.  The number of genes from each source varies greatly.  When the lists are compared to one another, there is very little overlap noted. Please see below: </P>
<b>Venn Diagram of the Number of Essential Genes Shared Between Lists in the Literature</b>
<b>Venn Diagram of the Number of Essential Genes Shared Between Lists in the Literature</b>
Line 103: Line 103:
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/a/a1/Uofa_Venn_of_literature.png" width="450" height="450">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/a/a1/Uofa_Venn_of_literature.png" width="450" height="450">
-
<P>The maximum number of genes in common between any two literature lists is 205, which is between Baba et al 2006 and Gerdes et al 2003. Only 48 genes were present in all four lists.</P>
+
<P>The maximum number of genes in common between any two literature lists is 205, which is between Baba et al 2006 and Gerdes et al 2003. Only 48 genes were present in all four lists.  The lack of consensus between these literature lists makes it very unreliable to use these genes in an essential genome.</P>

Revision as of 01:44, 16 October 2009

University of Alberta - BioBytes










































































































Literature Review

There were four primary literature sources which were used for the determination of the essential genome. These genes were analyzed to construct a preliminary essential gene list

Essential Gene List from the literature Method # of Genes considered essential % of E.coli genes considered essential # of genes unique to that list
Baba et al. 2006 Single gene knockout 303 6.4% 36
Gerdes et al 2003 Transposon insertions to inactivate single genes 617 13.0% 379
Gil et al 2004 Gene conservation and literature review 203 4.3% 53
Profiling of E.coli Chromosome (PEC) database Literature review 302 6.3% 126

Each gene list was determined in a variety of ways and there results show very little consistency. The number of genes from each source varies greatly. When the lists are compared to one another, there is very little overlap noted. Please see below:

Venn Diagram of the Number of Essential Genes Shared Between Lists in the Literature

The maximum number of genes in common between any two literature lists is 205, which is between Baba et al 2006 and Gerdes et al 2003. Only 48 genes were present in all four lists. The lack of consensus between these literature lists makes it very unreliable to use these genes in an essential genome.

Constructing the Biobytes Preliminary Essential Gene List

The preliminary essential gene list is based on literature sources. As described in the modeling section of this wiki, the metabolic genes from this preliminary list were used as a starting point for the computer model and were greatly altered based on the model's suggestions. Non-metabolic genes in the this preliminary list were retained in the final list, described in the "Gene Selection" tab.

Criteria for Gene Selection:

  • Genes must be present in more than one literature list unless there is particular reason to suspect they are essential.
  • The BioBytes metabolism is modeled after the minimal metabolism proposed by Gil et al 04, with the addition of cell wall, fatty acid, heme and ubiquitin synthesis, as Gil assumed these would not be necessary in a mycoplasma like minimal cell.
  • Additional genes required for metabolism were selected based on pathway information in the Ecocyc database. Redundancy of pathways is likely why these genes don’t appear essential in Baba, Gerdes and PEC.
  • Antitoxin genes are not essential as toxin genes would not be present.

Genes for the following processes were included:

  • DNA replication and cell division, but no DNA repair
  • Chaperones, but no heat shock or membrane stress response system
  • Transcription
  • Translation
  • Glycolysis
  • PMF generation via an ATP synthase consuming ATP to export protons.
  • Synthesis of acetyl-CoA from pyruvate
  • Fatty acid synthesis
  • Methylerithritol pathway (for undecaprenyl phosphate and a ubiquinone side chain)
  • Synthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine, but no other phospholipids
  • Pentose phosphate pathway (converts 6 or 3 carbon sugars to 5C sugars, such as ones needed in nucleotide biosynthesis)
  • Lipoprotein synthesis (Int and lolB are lipoproteins and essential)
  • Synthesis of nucleotides (deoxy and oxy) from nucleosides
  • Attaching lipid and biotin groups to protein
  • Transport:
    • PTC transport system (imports and phosphorylates glucose)
    • Inorganic phosphate transport
    • Nucleoside transport
    • Sec system (exports proteins to periplasm), including SRP for cotranslational membrane insertion. secB chaperone does not appear essential. There is NO tat system, which would be used to export cofactor containing folded proteins.
    • Lipoprotein transport to outermembrane
    • Glutathione transport
  • Cofactor synthesis:
    • Riboflavin from GTP and ribulose-5-phosphate
    • FAD from riboflavin
    • NAD from nicotinamide
    • NADPH from NAD
    • CoA from pantothenic acid
    • Methylene tetrahydroxyfolate (mTHF) from folic acid
    • S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) from methionine
    • Thiamine diphosphate (TPP) from thiamine
    • Pyridoxal-5-phosphate (PP) from pyridoxal
    • Heme from glutamate
    • Ubiquinone

RNAs:

The rrnC operon supplies all the rRNA’s and three of the tRNAs. This operon was selected because it includes the great number of tRNA’s. To select the other tRNA’s, all tRNA’s listed as essential in PEC were first included. One tRNA was then selected for each anticodon that differed on one of the last two bases. Differences in the first base can be accommodated by anticodon 'wobble'. At least one tRNA was included for each amino acid.

The complete list of essential RNA’s can be found here .

Statistics on BioBytes Preliminary Essential Gene List

Total genes in Ecoli: 4762

Total protein coding genes in BioBytes preliminary essentials list: 332

Total number of RNA genes in BioBytes preliminary essentials list: 29

BioBytes Final Essential Gene List

A final list of essential genes was produced from the literature review and the computer model.

Number of genes in list created from literature: 332

Number of additional genes suggested by model: 116

Number of genes in final essential genes list: 448

Number of genes in our essential gene list not classified as essential in the literature: 117