Team:Berkeley Wetlab/Passenger: Streptavidin

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Conclusions)
(Conclusions)
Line 42: Line 42:
===Conclusions===
===Conclusions===
-
While at first it seems trivial to display a small peptide such as the strepavidin binding protein, there seems to be a strong context effect that effects the function of the displayed protein. The use of a larger spacer as a linker (the INP repeat) seems to help the display of proteins.
+
While at first it seems trivial to display a small peptide such as the strepavidin binding protein, from the results, it seems that this is not the case. Many of the displayed strepavidin binding proteins did not work. There seems to be a strong context effect between the linker sequence used and the function of the displayed protein. The use of a larger linkers such as an INP repeat seems to help the cell surface display.

Revision as of 04:25, 21 October 2009

Contents

Strepavidin Binding Peptide

With the display of numerous of on the surface of a cell, there is a need determine the viability of the proteins. One such method is to tag the displayed proteins. By displaying a strepavidin binding protein, we can effectively tag displayers as well as other proteins of interest. The strepavidin binding protein is a short peptide sequence (SAECHPQGPPCIEGRK) that binds onto strepavidin. Using a streptavidin, R-phycoerythrin conjugate (SAPE), we can fluorescently tag proteins and displayers for high through-put, automated analysis.

Functional Assay: Fluorescent Plate Reader

This assay tests for the presence of a functional strep binding peptide on the E. coli cell surface, and its ability to bind to streptavidin, R-phycoerythrin conjugate (SAPE)

IGem2009Berkeley strep cartoon.JPG

Constructs:
Strepavidin binding protein with GGSG linker (15)
Strepavidin binding protein with INP repeat linker (14)
1363 Negative Control (1) (Strepavidin binding protein targeted to periplasm)
9494 Positive Control (1) (Displayed circularly permuted OmpX)

All experiments are done in triplicate

cell growth and induction

1. Grow a cells in a liquid culture overnight to saturation.
2. Make a 1:10 dilution the following day of the saturated cultures and innoculate with arabinose (100 μg/mL final concentration) and incubate for 5-6 hours.
3. Before assaying, measure OD600.

incubate with SAPE and Assay

1. Add 100 uL of cells to a polystyrene (PS) V-bottomed 96-well plate. Centrifuge and pellet the cells.
2. Flick away LB media and resuspend pellets in 100 uL PBS with 5.0 ug/mL of Streptavidin-PE.
3. Seal well plate with a film and incubate at 37C without shaking for 30 minutes.
4. Pellet the cells, remove the seal, and flick away PBS/Streptavidin-PE, keeping the cell pellets.
5. Pellet cells again and flick away the PBS wash.
6. Resuspend the pellets in 100 uL PBS, then pellet the cells and flick away the PBS wash.
7. Resuspend one last time in 100 uL PBS, taking care that the pellet has been completely resuspended.
8. Take an OD measurement after 3 washes, to ensure that we have not lost too much of the cells.
9. Take a Fluorescence measurement at Excitation wavelength of 488nm and emission wavelength 575 nm

Results

Data

IGem2009Berkeley strep linkers.JPG
UV image of strepavidin binding peptides
incubated with strepavidin and washed.

IGem2009Berkeley linkers comparison.JPG
Fluorescence of strepavidin binding protein with GGSG linker and INP repeats. The INP repeats greatly improved display.

Conclusions

While at first it seems trivial to display a small peptide such as the strepavidin binding protein, from the results, it seems that this is not the case. Many of the displayed strepavidin binding proteins did not work. There seems to be a strong context effect between the linker sequence used and the function of the displayed protein. The use of a larger linkers such as an INP repeat seems to help the cell surface display.