Team:IIT Madras/Results

From 2009.igem.org

Revision as of 15:11, 21 October 2009 by Abdul (Talk | contribs)

Indian Institute of Technology,Madras

IIT Madras













Contents

Results

Comparing the differences in the growth rates of cells with and without plasmids in various media



Growth curves


DH5aall4cases.jpg
Fig 8.1: DH5a grown in LB containing no antibiotic, LB containing Ampicillin, LB containing Chloramphenicol, LB containing both antibiotics.


Rfpall4cases.jpg
Fig 8.2: RFP (pSB1C3) contanining cells grown in LB containing no antibiotic, LB containing Ampicillin, LB containing Chloramphenicol, LB containing both antibiotics.


Cfpall4cases.jpg
Fig 8.3: CFP (pSB1A2) contanining cells grown in LB containing no antibiotic, LB containing Ampicillin, LB containing Chloramphenicol, LB containing both antibiotics.



RC4cases.jpg
Fig 8.4: RFP (pSB1C3) - CFP (pSB1A2) contanining cells grown in LB containing no antibiotic, LB containing Ampicillin, LB containing Chloramphenicol, LB containing both antibiotics.



Noaball4.jpg
Fig 8.5: All 4 strains in media without antibiotics.



Corraball4.jpg
Fig 8.6: All 4 strains in their corresponding antibiotic media - DH5a in Lb without antibiotics, RFP (pSB1C3) in LB with Chloramphenicol, CFP (pSB1A2) in LB with Ampicillin, RFP (pSB1C3) - CFP (pSB1A2) cells in LB with Chloramphenicol and Ampicillin.



Logall4noab.jpg
Fig 8.7: log (OD600) vs Time plot for all 4 strains in media without antibiotics.



Logcorrab.jpg
Fig 8.8: log (OD600) vs Time plot for all 4 strains in their corresponding antibiotic media - DH5a in Lb without antibiotics, RFP (pSB1C3) in LB with Chloramphenicol, CFP (pSB1A2) in LB with Ampicillin, RFP (pSB1C3) - CFP (pSB1A2) cells in LB with Chloramphenicol and Ampicillin.

Modeling

Fluorescent Imaging