"
Team:Paris/Ethics ethicalreport
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Main - Methodology : Real time ethical reflexion) |
|||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="right-side"></div> | <div id="right-side"></div> | ||
| + | </html> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <html> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div id="paris_content_boxtop"> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div id="paris_content"> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 19:51, 19 October 2009
iGEM > Paris > Ethic > Ethical LabBook > Main
Main - Methodology : Real time ethical reflexion
The Paris team ethical and sociological report
The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here.
- Preface
- Methods
- Introduction
- A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
- B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world.
- I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns
- A. Biosafety
- B. Biosecurity
- II. Naturality and Artificiality.
- A. From “what” do we have to protect nature?
- B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue?
- C. A false question? ...
- D. … An ironical answer
- E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living.
- F. Conclusion
- III. Practices
- A. What form for what life science?
- B. Self or Exploded governance?
- C. Forms of critics
- D. To finish with... A case study
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendices : Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.
- Preface : Why wonder about ethics in a biological engineering competition?
- Methods : How was this report made?
- Introduction : what are our goals?
