"
Team:HKUST/Group3
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
By comparing these six conditions, we can decide whether the attractant pathway under the FUS1 promoter can response to signals generated by the receptor and can effectively produce attractant molecules (table 2). </p> | By comparing these six conditions, we can decide whether the attractant pathway under the FUS1 promoter can response to signals generated by the receptor and can effectively produce attractant molecules (table 2). </p> | ||
| - | |||
<img src="http://igem2009hkust.fileave.com/wiki/Group3/figure04.jpg" width=600; height=300 /><br> | <img src="http://igem2009hkust.fileave.com/wiki/Group3/figure04.jpg" width=600; height=300 /><br> | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 21 October 2009
a
Construction of Attractant production and Reporter pathway
To functionally express the yeast ARO9 gene and EGFP gene, we have designed a reporter and an attractant production constructs. Based on the fact that yeast endogenous FUS1 promoter can sense the signal generated by the receptor, and the yeast endogenous FUS1 terminator can stop the transcription activated by the promoter, we have designed such a pathway that puts ARO9 gene (with the original promoter deleted) and EGFP gene under the control of the FUS1 promoter. We have also have control constructs for later experiments. The whole system is cloned into the multiple cloning site of the pRS426 yeast expression vector.
Figure 3. Attractant, reporter and control constructs
Test of the Reporter System
The yeast strain YPH501 with ARO9 gene deleted would be transformed with pRS426-FUS1P-EGFP-FUS1T, pRS426-EGFP, respectively. After α factor binding, we would expect to see that the MAPK pathway is activated and then the downstream FUS1-promotor-driven expression of GFP. The expression of GFP could be viewed by fluorescence microscopy.
Attractant production test
Second we will test our attractant production pathway and the attractiveness towards Drosophilae using the Cage Bioassays method given by J. Zhu, et al, 2003.(Figure 4)
By comparing these six conditions, we can decide whether the attractant pathway under the FUS1 promoter can response to signals generated by the receptor and can effectively produce attractant molecules (table 2).
Further characterization of the Attractant production pathway function
To further characterize the attractant production pathway function, we can do the following assays.First, we can use the HPLC or some other analytical chemical methods to analyze the attractant concentration in the yeast extract and find the best attractant concentration towards Drosophilae.
Second, we can change the strain of the yeast to test the attractiveness differences between strains and find the best strain for attractant production.
iGEM 2009
