Team:Alberta/Optimization
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Sciocleseus (Talk | contribs) |
Sciocleseus (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | The original format of the universal primers did not have the uracils distributed evenly within the primer. The result was poor efficiency in construction on a bead. Our hypothesis was that the uracils, if they were distributed more evenly, would create smaller pieces of ssDNA that would more easily melt off the Byte to generate fully ssDNA 12 base overhangs. | + | The original format of the universal primers did not have the uracils distributed evenly within the primer. The result was poor efficiency in construction on a bead. Our hypothesis was that the uracils, if they were distributed more evenly, would create smaller pieces of ssDNA that would more easily melt off the Byte to generate fully ssDNA 12 base overhangs. The first version of our USER ends is shown below. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/2/2a/Alberta_iGEM_2009_USER1.png"> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 19:14, 21 October 2009
|
Optimizing Linear AssemblyMuch work has been done to try and increase the efficiency by which we generate the Bytes, anchor them, assemble them, and terminate them. A general outline of the optimizations we have considered and worked on are shown below as well as their effects on the process.
|
The Uracil Dilemma
The original format of the universal primers did not have the uracils distributed evenly within the primer. The result was poor efficiency in construction on a bead. Our hypothesis was that the uracils, if they were distributed more evenly, would create smaller pieces of ssDNA that would more easily melt off the Byte to generate fully ssDNA 12 base overhangs. The first version of our USER ends is shown below.
|