Team:Alberta/Optimization

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 113: Line 113:
<ul>
<ul>
<li><b>USER<sup>TM</sup> digestion duration</b> was considered at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 hours.  By examining the efficiency of ligation of AB and BA Bytes processed under these conditions that no changes in efficiency were observed after 1 hour.
<li><b>USER<sup>TM</sup> digestion duration</b> was considered at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 hours.  By examining the efficiency of ligation of AB and BA Bytes processed under these conditions that no changes in efficiency were observed after 1 hour.
-
<br>
+
<br><br><br>
<li><b>PCR purification conditions</b> were considered in terms of the temperature at which the purification, using a spin column kit, was conducted. 23°C(room temperature), 37°C and 50°C conditions were tried.  We observed maximal efficiency in terms of yield and ligation efficiency of Bytes by PCR purifying at 37°C.
<li><b>PCR purification conditions</b> were considered in terms of the temperature at which the purification, using a spin column kit, was conducted. 23°C(room temperature), 37°C and 50°C conditions were tried.  We observed maximal efficiency in terms of yield and ligation efficiency of Bytes by PCR purifying at 37°C.
-
<br>
+
<br><br><br>
<li><b>Alternative purification techniques</b> proved better than PCR purification.  We found that by running the USER<sup>TM</sup> digested PCR products on a gel then gel extracting the band of interest not only prevented carry over of template DNA from PCR and extraneous PCR products (minimal anyway), but also showed better efficiency for ligation of the Bytes. To optimize even further we found that adding pH 5.2 3M sodium acetate to the dissolved gel pieces gave increased yields.
<li><b>Alternative purification techniques</b> proved better than PCR purification.  We found that by running the USER<sup>TM</sup> digested PCR products on a gel then gel extracting the band of interest not only prevented carry over of template DNA from PCR and extraneous PCR products (minimal anyway), but also showed better efficiency for ligation of the Bytes. To optimize even further we found that adding pH 5.2 3M sodium acetate to the dissolved gel pieces gave increased yields.
-
<br>
+
<br><br><br>
<li><b>Ligation</b> is an important part of Byte assembly on a bead.  We tried both T4 and Taq DNA ligases and found that by far T4 was better. T4's increased efficiency allowed large constructs to be assembled with higher relative yields.  We also tried ligation at room temperature versus at 4°C, hypothesizing that at reduced temperature ligation efficiency will go down but the 3' 12 base Byte ends may anneal more stably.  We ligated for nearly 1.5 hours under both conditions and found that ligation at room temperature is preferable.
<li><b>Ligation</b> is an important part of Byte assembly on a bead.  We tried both T4 and Taq DNA ligases and found that by far T4 was better. T4's increased efficiency allowed large constructs to be assembled with higher relative yields.  We also tried ligation at room temperature versus at 4°C, hypothesizing that at reduced temperature ligation efficiency will go down but the 3' 12 base Byte ends may anneal more stably.  We ligated for nearly 1.5 hours under both conditions and found that ligation at room temperature is preferable.
-
<br>
+
<br><br><br>
</li>
</li>
</ul>
</ul>

Revision as of 20:44, 21 October 2009

University of Alberta - BioBytes










































































































https://2009.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Alberta/Optimization&action=edit

Optimizing Linear Assembly

Much work has been done to try and increase the efficiency by which we generate the Bytes, anchor them, assemble them, and terminate them. A general outline of the optimizations we have considered and worked on are shown below as well as their effects on the process.

The Uracil Dilemma

The original format of the universal primers did not have the uracils distributed evenly within the primer. The result was poor efficiency in construction on a bead. Our hypothesis was that the uracils, if they were distributed more evenly, would create smaller pieces of ssDNA that would more easily melt off the Byte to generate fully ssDNA 12 base overhangs. The first version of our USER ends is shown below. By changing primers to their current form we have consequently increased efficiency of construction 2.5 times that of the first version.


BioByte Processing

An essential step in assembly with BioBytes if the preparation of the Bytes. Following PCR the product is USERTM digested to nick the DNA. Finally, the Bytes are purified away from these small ssDNA pieces to prevent their binding to the sticky ends during assembly and consequently negatively influencing the efficiency of construction. The following describes the results of optimization experiments conducted to increase efficiency of BioBytes.

  • USERTM Digestion

    • USERTM digestion duration was considered at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 hours. By examining the efficiency of ligation of AB and BA Bytes processed under these conditions that no changes in efficiency were observed after 1 hour.


    • PCR purification conditions were considered in terms of the temperature at which the purification, using a spin column kit, was conducted. 23°C(room temperature), 37°C and 50°C conditions were tried. We observed maximal efficiency in terms of yield and ligation efficiency of Bytes by PCR purifying at 37°C.


    • Alternative purification techniques proved better than PCR purification. We found that by running the USERTM digested PCR products on a gel then gel extracting the band of interest not only prevented carry over of template DNA from PCR and extraneous PCR products (minimal anyway), but also showed better efficiency for ligation of the Bytes. To optimize even further we found that adding pH 5.2 3M sodium acetate to the dissolved gel pieces gave increased yields.


    • Ligation is an important part of Byte assembly on a bead. We tried both T4 and Taq DNA ligases and found that by far T4 was better. T4's increased efficiency allowed large constructs to be assembled with higher relative yields. We also tried ligation at room temperature versus at 4°C, hypothesizing that at reduced temperature ligation efficiency will go down but the 3' 12 base Byte ends may anneal more stably. We ligated for nearly 1.5 hours under both conditions and found that ligation at room temperature is preferable.