Team:Calgary/Modelling/Results
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<br><br><br><br> | <br><br><br><br> | ||
- | <div class="heading">The Effect of | + | <div class="heading">The Effect of Varying the Level of LuxPQ on the Degradation of GFP</div> |
<div class="desc"> | <div class="desc"> | ||
The following is the graph produced by our differential equation based model under five different levels of LuxPQ (1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000): | The following is the graph produced by our differential equation based model under five different levels of LuxPQ (1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000): | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | <center ><a href ="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/e/ec/IGEM_Calgary_Modelling_ChangesPQ_Oct20.jpg"> <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/e/ec/IGEM_Calgary_Modelling_ChangesPQ_Oct20.jpg" height=" | + | <center ><a href ="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/e/ec/IGEM_Calgary_Modelling_ChangesPQ_Oct20.jpg"> <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/e/ec/IGEM_Calgary_Modelling_ChangesPQ_Oct20.jpg" height="300px" width = " 700px" alt =" click to view full size "> </a> </center> <br> |
<center> Figure 1: The rate of GFP degradation for different <i>LuxPQ</i> levels with respect to time.</center> | <center> Figure 1: The rate of GFP degradation for different <i>LuxPQ</i> levels with respect to time.</center> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
- | <a href ="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/2/2d/AI-2_sensitivity_Calgary2.jpg"> <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/2/2d/AI-2_sensitivity_Calgary2.jpg" height=" | + | <a href ="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/2/2d/AI-2_sensitivity_Calgary2.jpg"> <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/2/2d/AI-2_sensitivity_Calgary2.jpg" height="300px" width = " 700px" alt =" click to view full size "> </a></center> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<center> Figure 2. The rate of GFP degradation for different AI-2 levels with respect to time. The LuxPQ level was kept at 100 because as shown in figure 1, LuxPQ at 1, 10, and 100 seemed to produce a consistent rate of GFP degradation.</center> | <center> Figure 2. The rate of GFP degradation for different AI-2 levels with respect to time. The LuxPQ level was kept at 100 because as shown in figure 1, LuxPQ at 1, 10, and 100 seemed to produce a consistent rate of GFP degradation.</center> | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
- | + | At AI-2 levels of 1 and 10, the degradation rate of GFP remain constant due to lack of [AI-2:LuxPQ] complex to carry out the de-phosphorylation of LuxU. At 100 AI-2 molecules, we start to see some degradation of GFP due to increase in the [AI-2:LuxPQ] phosphotase. However, as the binding of AI-2 to LuxPQ is not 100%, not all of 100 AI-2 are bound to LuxPQ molecules, and therefore the GFP degradation does not reach 0. Finally, beyond AI-2 levels of 1000, we see a significant decrease in GFP, almost reaching 0. This phenomenon possibly suggests that the AI-2 level have to be at least a fold higher than the level of LuxPQ in order to see a significant difference between system on and off. | |
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:21, 22 October 2009
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY