"
Minnesota/15 June 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {|style="align:left" width="965" |- |''' Back to Notebook Home''' |- |'''Go to Previous Day (June 12)'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/...) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|'''[[Minnesota/12 June 2009|Go to Previous Day (June 12)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/16 June 2009|Go to Next Day (June 16)]]''' | |'''[[Minnesota/12 June 2009|Go to Previous Day (June 12)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/16 June 2009|Go to Next Day (June 16)]]''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | '''Patrick'''<br> | ||
| + | Three models were submitted and analyzed today. First the base model with not alterations. Seconf, a modification of the model such that the kinetic constant of tetR2 binding to tetO1 and tetO2 (reactions 15, 17, 19, 25, 27, 29) was altered by an order of magnitude up or down. This was to observe whether the rate of binding of the tet operons had a major affect of the GFP production.<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The two altered models produced did not show a significant difference from the base model. Here I present the three models as 2D plots of GFP over time, with each aTc concentration indicated by a separate line:<br> | ||
Revision as of 19:30, 29 July 2009
| Back to Notebook Home | |
| Go to Previous Day (June 12) | Go to Next Day (June 16) |
Patrick
Three models were submitted and analyzed today. First the base model with not alterations. Seconf, a modification of the model such that the kinetic constant of tetR2 binding to tetO1 and tetO2 (reactions 15, 17, 19, 25, 27, 29) was altered by an order of magnitude up or down. This was to observe whether the rate of binding of the tet operons had a major affect of the GFP production.
The two altered models produced did not show a significant difference from the base model. Here I present the three models as 2D plots of GFP over time, with each aTc concentration indicated by a separate line:
