Template:Team:KULeuven/21 August 2009/VanillinProduction

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: * Test 2: We loaded yesterday's restrictions on an agarose gel. It showed that the enzymes cut properly. However, the EF results were not exspected. It seems that somehow the bacteria had ...)
 
(6 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
* Test 2: We loaded yesterday's restrictions on an agarose gel. It showed that the enzymes cut properly.
+
* <u>Test 2</u>: We loaded yesterday's restrictions on an agarose gel. It showed that the enzymes cut properly.
-
However, the EF results were not exspected. It seems that somehow the bacteria had taken in a self-closed Ech-plasmid. The bands do not correspond with an EF-ligation product.
+
However, the EF results were unexpected. It seems that somehow the bacteria had taken in a self-closed ''ech''-plasmid. The signals do not correspond with an EF-ligation product.
* The DNA was purified from the gel  
* The DNA was purified from the gel  
Line 8: Line 8:
!| Part || ng/µl || 260/280 ||
!| Part || ng/µl || 260/280 ||
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
-
| Sam8 ||2,5 || 1,14 ||  
+
| ''sam8'' ||2,5 || 1,14 ||  
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
-
| Sam5 ||7,9 || 1,60 ||   
+
| ''sam5'' ||7,9 || 1,60 ||   
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
-
| Ech ||5,0 || 1,38 ||  
+
| ''ech'' ||5,0 || 1,38 ||  
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
-
| Fcs ||3,4 || 0,93 ||  
+
| ''fcs'' ||3,4 || 0,93 ||  
|-
|-
|}   
|}   
-
* Sam8 and Sam5; Fcs and Ech were ligated
+
* ''sam8'' and ''sam5''; ''fcs'' and ''ech'' were ligated
Used volumes:
Used volumes:
Line 24: Line 24:
!| Part || µl ||  
!| Part || µl ||  
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
-
| Sam8 ||34,0 ||   
+
| ''sam8'' ||34 ||   
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
-
| Sam5 ||6,3 ||   
+
| ''sam5'' ||6,3 ||   
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
-
| Ech ||10,0 ||   
+
| ''ech'' ||10,0 ||   
|- align="center"
|- align="center"
-
| Fcs ||35,8 ||  
+
| ''fcs'' ||35,8 ||  
|-
|-
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 11:39, 14 September 2009

  • Test 2: We loaded yesterday's restrictions on an agarose gel. It showed that the enzymes cut properly.

However, the EF results were unexpected. It seems that somehow the bacteria had taken in a self-closed ech-plasmid. The signals do not correspond with an EF-ligation product.

  • The DNA was purified from the gel

Nanodrop results:

Part ng/µl 260/280
sam8 2,5 1,14
sam5 7,9 1,60
ech 5,0 1,38
fcs 3,4 0,93
  • sam8 and sam5; fcs and ech were ligated

Used volumes:

Part µl
sam8 34
sam5 6,3
ech 10,0
fcs 35,8