Team:Sheffield/Modeling

SYSTEM BREAKDOWN

We are going to analyse the biological system in a control perspective way. Our 3 main aims are;

1) Suggesting a realistic model for the system

2) Comparing the wet lab result with our model

3) A standard description of how our overall system intends to work.

Model

Lets first look at how our initial system works. The flow diagram below gives a brief description of it;

The above flow chart can be reconstructed into a control block diagram;

The script below shows how each block parameters are designed

Our next step is to simulate the model, which brings about an interesting design practise which my team has employed. Which is, how does the photoreceptor works? And how does it affect the system when light intensity varies?

A point to note; each ODE’s tends to a steady state after some time. Therefore we have suggested that:

Constants Kk and K-k varies with the amount of light shined on the system and as well achieves a steady state at a certain point.

Without the presence of red light, the concentration of OmpRP should increase. Therefore the constant Kk which affects the rate of reaction should decrease with intensity. Whereas K-k should increase as intensity increases.

Values of other constants assumed:

k1=0.01, k-1=0.01, k2=0.01, k-2=0.01, kp=0.01, kt=0.01.

Initial concentration of:

EnvZ = 1M, EnvZP = 1M, (EnvZP)OmpR = 1M, OmpRP = 1M, OmpR = 1M, EnvZ(OmpRP) = 1M.

We are interested in knowing how the concentration of OmpRP varies since it promotes the activity of LacZ which produces black precipitate. Also a measure of EnvZ could show us the opposite.

To achieve this we employed the Euler method; with a time interval of 1 second.

From the graph above it is clear that at high intensity OmpRP concentration is less, therefore activity of LacZ should be less as well.

Now we shall make a model for the transcription and translation of the system which will show us how the activity of LacZ varies with intensity. The script below descibes our model;

Constants used:

t1=0.1, t2=0.1, d1=0.01, d2=1.

From the graphs above we could see that at intensity 10% the amount of LacZ activity tends to 1 more than 90%. Therefore more black precipitate is formed at 10% rather than 90%, which proves the model.

Wet lab result analysis

From the graph above we could see that the system does behave as our predicted model after 12 hours. The system tends to be unstable before it. A kinetic model can be defined for the system after 12 hours, which is:

For all 3 antibiotics y= -0.1518x^2 + 1.5289x + 7.5641

For control y= -1.5133x^2 + 16.8821x - 11.1247

Where y is activity of LacZ (miller units) and x is intensity (microeinstein/square meter/ second)

These graphs show a clear idea of how the whole system binds together, which has 3 parameters varying (intensity, time and activity of LacZ). Any design process which involves this system could use this to predict the outcome of the model.

For instance if we are working with this system under a wavelength of 6 (all 3 antibiotics), a system identification process could be employed showing a time dependent model;

y= -0.4152t2 + 7.6872t -16.4965

Where y is activity of LacZ (miller units) and t is time (hours)

General description

References

[http://www.pnas.org/content/100/2/691.full# 1) Robustness and the cycle of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in a two-component regulatory system(Eric Batchelor and Mark Goulian)]