Team:Heidelberg/Modeling network

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(21 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
-
 
{{Template_HD_3}}
{{Template_HD_3}}
-
<html><body id="modeling_network"></body></html>
+
<html><body id="project_measure"></body></html>
 +
 
{|
{|
-
|-valign="top" border="0"
+
|-valign="top" border="0" style="margin-left: 2px;"
-
|width="650px" style="padding: 0 20px 0 0; background-color:#ede8e2"|
+
|width="650px" style="padding: 0 15px 15px 20px; background-color:#ede8e2"|
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
-
 
= HEARTBEAT Fuzzy Modeling =  
= HEARTBEAT Fuzzy Modeling =  
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
-
In order to achieve defined protein levels in a cell, promoters of defined strength are an obvious requirement.  [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Synthetic_promoters|Such promoters]] can only be valuable in synthetic biology if they are well characterized. For future eucaryotic devices that require [http://www.partsregistry.org/PoPS PoPS (Polymerase per second)] as an input, our promoters will be very suitable since they deliver PoPS as an output. PoPs is ''the'' standard unit of synthetic biology, but it is very difficult to measure directly. For bacteria, relative measurements (relative promoter units, RPU) are most commonly used and it has been shown how to convert them to PoPs [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Measurement#References|[1]]]. We identified several challenges to achieve the same in mammalian cells, suggest solutions and provide easy-to use relative measures for application in mammalian cells - one based on RNA levels (Relative Mammalian Promoter Units, RMPU), the other based on folded protein levels (Relative Expression Units, REU). We apply those measurements to the characterization on CMV, an existing promoter from the registry. Finally, we discuss how to transform these units into PoPS.
+
The research field of [[Team:Heidelberg/Eukaryopedia#Regulation of transcription in eukaryotic organisms|regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes]] is a field of biological research growing rapidly [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[1,2]]]. Hereby the interaction of DNA with certain proteins known as transcription factors (TFs) plays an essential role for the complex mechanism of transcriptional activation [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[3,4]]]. One strong focus of synthetic biology aims at the reconstruction of such gene regulatory networks [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[5]]]. To act within the scope of synthetic biology’s duties, the iGEM Team Heidelberg 09 claims that any synthetic promoter can be constructed by using our [[Team:Heidelberg/Project Synthetic promoters|two methods for the construction of synthetic promoters]]. However, the only efficient way to construct systems of high complexity (such as computers or airplanes) is simulating these systems on the computer prior to construction [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[6]]]. In our case, this strongly emphasizes the necessity of
 +
[[Team:Heidelberg|HEARTBEAT]] (Heidelberg Artificial Transcription Factor Binding Site Engineering and Assembly Tool) which comprises data analysis (data analysis ([[Team:Heidelberg|HEARTBEAT DB]]), a graphical user interface ([[Team:Heidelberg|HEARTBEAT GUI]]) and network modeling ([[Team:Heidelberg|HEARTBEAT fuzzy network (FN) modeling]]).
 +
 
 +
Contributing to the HEARTBEAT project, HEARTBEAT FN focuses on simulating the promoter activity by integrating a variety of signals and sequence characteristics as well as on predicting distinct pathway functionalities. This, especially in eukaryotic systems, is a tough challenge since transcriptional activity of a gene is not directly correlated to protein expression [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[7]]].
 +
 
 +
For this purpose we propose fuzzy logic (FL) modeling as an approach to logic-based modeling which is capable of incorporating qualitative data but producing quantitative predictions. New insights will be provided about the operation of gene regulatory networks and relationships between promoter sequence composition and TF-DNA interaction will be unraveled that is understood only marginally so far [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[8,9]]].
== Background / Motivation ==
== Background / Motivation ==
-
The need for standardized measurements of promoter activity ''in vivo'' has been widely accepted across the synthetic biology community [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Measurement#References|[1]]]. Only if a part is well characterized initially, function of an engineered device or system can be predicted reliably. Most work of synthetic biology has focused on bacteria, especially Escherichia Coli, as a model system. Novel tasks in synthetic biology, especially for medical applications, will require synthetic biology of mammalian cells. Mammalian systems are the most complex biological systems, and therefore, little work has been done in the field of mammalian synthetic biology, leaving a huge potential for future research.<br>
+
We present two different approaches for promoter design resulting in three different types of synthetic promoters: '''randomly assembled''' ''constitutive'' and ''inducible'' promoters as well as '''rationally designed''' promoters. As an additional type of promoters those '''occurring in nature''' can be integrated into vector systems.
 +
These heterogeneous cocktail of promoters can be combined for a precise regulation of pathways. This represents the power of our entire HEARTBEAT project.
 +
Synthesized promoters can be then used e.g. as a combinatorial gene therapy, i.e. several promoters that are of different types and/or have different strength will be applied as treatment agents. Therefore, a model that not only simulates single promoter activity and following gene expression but also accurately predicts gene expression from combined promoter sequences is indispensable.
-
[[Image:HD09_formula1.png|thumb|left|294px|'''Box 1: Calculation of PoPs''', where ''&gamma;M'' is the mRNA degradation rate, ''a'' is the GFP maturation rate, ''&gamma;i'' is the degradation rate of immature GFP, &rho; is the tranlation rate of immature GFP from mRNA and ''n'' is the number of copies of promoter per cell.
+
We constructed a Fuzzy Logic model to provide a formal mathematical framework for prediction of combined activity of multiple promoters upon several stimuli and to gain insight into the mechanisms that generate diverse expression levels.
 +
 
 +
== Achievements ==
 +
 
 +
=== A Short Introduction into Fuzzy Logic Modeling ===
 +
 
 +
Fuzzy Logic is a rule-based approximate artificial reasoning method developed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lofti_Zadeh| Lotfi Zadeh] in 1965. Its motivation is
 +
the observation that humans often think and communicate in a vague way, and yet can make precise decisions [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[10]]]. It has been widely used in engineering and Artificial Intelligence approaches such as Fuzzy Controllers and Fuzzy Expert Systems. Fuzzy Logic has also been used for the modeling of biological pathways [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[11]]] and very recently to analyze gene regulatory networks [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[12]]]. Key advantages of Fuzzy logic-based approaches are '''(i)''' the ability to construct models based on prior knowledge of the system and experimental data and '''(ii)''' encode intermediate states for inputs and outputs, thus improving other logic-approaches that can only deal with ''ON/OFF'' states such
 +
as Boolean models [[Team:Heidelberg/Modeling_network#References|[13]]] and '''(iii)''' simulations can be derived from both qualitative and quantitative data, both of which can be cast into the form of ''IF-THEN'' rules. Thus, FL constitutes a powerful approach for the understanding of heterogeneous datasets.
 +
 
 +
In our project, the complete set of rules will capture the behavior of each promoter in a Multiple-Input Single-Output (MISO) Fuzzy Logic model. Combining the MISO models in a network of all promoters will constitute the final Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) model allowing for the simulation and prediction of combined activation of pahways regulated by our promoters. A key advantage of this methodology towards understanding the exclusive pathway activation of our promoters of interest is the possibility to study not only the individual activity of each promoter but also the combined activity, as the signal progresses from one MISO to another.
== References ==
== References ==
-
[1] Kelly, JR et al in Journal of Biological Engineering 3 (2009): "Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard"<br>
+
[1] Harbison, C. T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature '''431''', 99-104 (2004).<br>
-
[2] http://www.promega.com/tbs/tm058/tm058.html<br>
+
[2] Hu, Z., Killion, P. J. & Iyer, V. R. Genetic reconstruction of a functional transcriptional regulatory network. Nature Genet. '''39''', 683-687 (2007).<br>
 +
[3] Gertz, J., Siggia E. D. & Cohen, B. A. Analysis of combinatorial ''cis''-regulation in synthetic and genomic promoters. Nature '''457'''. 215-218 (2009)<br>
 +
[4] Roider, H. G. et al. Predicting transcription factor affinities to DNA from a biophysical model. Bioinformatics '''23''', 134-141 (2006)<br>
 +
[5] ref to come<br>
 +
[6] Andianantoandro, E. et al. Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline. Mol Sys Biol (2006)<br>
 +
[7] Alberts, B. et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th edition. Garland Science, 2008, Chapter 6<br>
 +
[8] Vardhanabhuti, S., Wang, J. & Hannenhalli, S. Position and distance specificity are important determinants of ''cis''-regulatory motifs in addition to evolutionary conservation. Nucl Acid Res '''35''', 3203-3213 (2007).<br>
 +
[9] Yokoyama, K. D., Ohler, U. & Wray, G. A. Measuring spatial preferences at fine-scale resolution identifies known and novel ''cis''-regulatory element candidates and functional motif-pair relationships. Nucl Acid Res, 1-21 (2009)<br>
 +
[10] Nelles, O. Nonlinear System Identification. Springer, 2000. <br>
 +
[11] Bosl, W. J. BMC systems biology 1, 13 (2007).<br>
 +
[12] Mathematical modeling of the lambda switch:a fuzzy logic approach.<br>
 +
[13] B. B. Aldridge, J. Saez-Rodriguez, J. L. Muhlich et al., PLoS
 +
computational biology 5 (4), e1000340 (2009).
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
<!--
 +
Journal
 +
Surename, first letter of forname. Titel. Journal volume of Journal, pages (published year).
 +
Bsp.
 +
Eils, R. Breakthrough in the field of synthetic biology, iGEM team Heidelberg presents the results. science 180, 469–480 (2010).
 +
 
 +
Internet
 +
Surename, first letter of forename. Title. Online publication, http:// ., date
 +
Bsp.
 +
Eils, R. Breakthrough in the field of synthetic biology, iGEM team Heidelberg presents the results. Online publication, http://simonisdoof.co.uk, 13.10.2009
 +
 
 +
Book
 +
Surename, first letter of forename. Title. City of publication: publisher, year of publication, page.
 +
Eils, R. Breakthrough in the field of synthetic biology, iGEM team Heidelberg presents the results. Heidelberg: Bioquant-Publishing, 2010, p. 1-1000.
 +
-->
|width="250px" style="background-color:#d8d5d0"|
|width="250px" style="background-color:#d8d5d0"|
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 09:44, 21 October 2009

HEARTBEAT Fuzzy Modeling

Introduction

The research field of regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes is a field of biological research growing rapidly [1,2]. Hereby the interaction of DNA with certain proteins known as transcription factors (TFs) plays an essential role for the complex mechanism of transcriptional activation [3,4]. One strong focus of synthetic biology aims at the reconstruction of such gene regulatory networks [5]. To act within the scope of synthetic biology’s duties, the iGEM Team Heidelberg 09 claims that any synthetic promoter can be constructed by using our two methods for the construction of synthetic promoters. However, the only efficient way to construct systems of high complexity (such as computers or airplanes) is simulating these systems on the computer prior to construction [6]. In our case, this strongly emphasizes the necessity of HEARTBEAT (Heidelberg Artificial Transcription Factor Binding Site Engineering and Assembly Tool) which comprises data analysis (data analysis (HEARTBEAT DB), a graphical user interface (HEARTBEAT GUI) and network modeling (HEARTBEAT fuzzy network (FN) modeling).

Contributing to the HEARTBEAT project, HEARTBEAT FN focuses on simulating the promoter activity by integrating a variety of signals and sequence characteristics as well as on predicting distinct pathway functionalities. This, especially in eukaryotic systems, is a tough challenge since transcriptional activity of a gene is not directly correlated to protein expression [7].

For this purpose we propose fuzzy logic (FL) modeling as an approach to logic-based modeling which is capable of incorporating qualitative data but producing quantitative predictions. New insights will be provided about the operation of gene regulatory networks and relationships between promoter sequence composition and TF-DNA interaction will be unraveled that is understood only marginally so far [8,9].

Background / Motivation

We present two different approaches for promoter design resulting in three different types of synthetic promoters: randomly assembled constitutive and inducible promoters as well as rationally designed promoters. As an additional type of promoters those occurring in nature can be integrated into vector systems. These heterogeneous cocktail of promoters can be combined for a precise regulation of pathways. This represents the power of our entire HEARTBEAT project. Synthesized promoters can be then used e.g. as a combinatorial gene therapy, i.e. several promoters that are of different types and/or have different strength will be applied as treatment agents. Therefore, a model that not only simulates single promoter activity and following gene expression but also accurately predicts gene expression from combined promoter sequences is indispensable.

We constructed a Fuzzy Logic model to provide a formal mathematical framework for prediction of combined activity of multiple promoters upon several stimuli and to gain insight into the mechanisms that generate diverse expression levels.

Achievements

A Short Introduction into Fuzzy Logic Modeling

Fuzzy Logic is a rule-based approximate artificial reasoning method developed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lofti_Zadeh| Lotfi Zadeh] in 1965. Its motivation is the observation that humans often think and communicate in a vague way, and yet can make precise decisions [10]. It has been widely used in engineering and Artificial Intelligence approaches such as Fuzzy Controllers and Fuzzy Expert Systems. Fuzzy Logic has also been used for the modeling of biological pathways [11] and very recently to analyze gene regulatory networks [12]. Key advantages of Fuzzy logic-based approaches are (i) the ability to construct models based on prior knowledge of the system and experimental data and (ii) encode intermediate states for inputs and outputs, thus improving other logic-approaches that can only deal with ON/OFF states such as Boolean models [13] and (iii) simulations can be derived from both qualitative and quantitative data, both of which can be cast into the form of IF-THEN rules. Thus, FL constitutes a powerful approach for the understanding of heterogeneous datasets.

In our project, the complete set of rules will capture the behavior of each promoter in a Multiple-Input Single-Output (MISO) Fuzzy Logic model. Combining the MISO models in a network of all promoters will constitute the final Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) model allowing for the simulation and prediction of combined activation of pahways regulated by our promoters. A key advantage of this methodology towards understanding the exclusive pathway activation of our promoters of interest is the possibility to study not only the individual activity of each promoter but also the combined activity, as the signal progresses from one MISO to another.

References

[1] Harbison, C. T. et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431, 99-104 (2004).
[2] Hu, Z., Killion, P. J. & Iyer, V. R. Genetic reconstruction of a functional transcriptional regulatory network. Nature Genet. 39, 683-687 (2007).
[3] Gertz, J., Siggia E. D. & Cohen, B. A. Analysis of combinatorial cis-regulation in synthetic and genomic promoters. Nature 457. 215-218 (2009)
[4] Roider, H. G. et al. Predicting transcription factor affinities to DNA from a biophysical model. Bioinformatics 23, 134-141 (2006)
[5] ref to come
[6] Andianantoandro, E. et al. Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline. Mol Sys Biol (2006)
[7] Alberts, B. et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th edition. Garland Science, 2008, Chapter 6
[8] Vardhanabhuti, S., Wang, J. & Hannenhalli, S. Position and distance specificity are important determinants of cis-regulatory motifs in addition to evolutionary conservation. Nucl Acid Res 35, 3203-3213 (2007).
[9] Yokoyama, K. D., Ohler, U. & Wray, G. A. Measuring spatial preferences at fine-scale resolution identifies known and novel cis-regulatory element candidates and functional motif-pair relationships. Nucl Acid Res, 1-21 (2009)
[10] Nelles, O. Nonlinear System Identification. Springer, 2000.
[11] Bosl, W. J. BMC systems biology 1, 13 (2007).
[12] Mathematical modeling of the lambda switch:a fuzzy logic approach.
[13] B. B. Aldridge, J. Saez-Rodriguez, J. L. Muhlich et al., PLoS computational biology 5 (4), e1000340 (2009).