MODELLING
From 2009.igem.org
(→Biomaterials Modelling) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | + | <html> | |
<body style="background-color:#006380"> | <body style="background-color:#006380"> | ||
- | </html><html><div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"> | + | <html> |
- | <a href="https://2009.igem.org/2009.igem.org/metu-gene/parts"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 900px; height: 500px;" alt="w7" src="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/images/5/59/Mm.jpg"></a></div> | + | <div align="center"><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:METU-Gene/Events_in_Wound_Dressing"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/d/d4/Events_in_WDk.gif" |
+ | style="width:15%; height:150px; border:2px solid #aaa; margin:-10px 5px 10px 15px;" | ||
+ | title="Events in Wound Dressing"> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:METU-Gene/Working_Mechanism"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/b/b5/Workingmechk.gif" | ||
+ | style="width:15%; height:150px; border:2px solid #aaa; margin:-10px 5px 10px 0px;" | ||
+ | title="Working Mechanism"> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:METU-Gene/Methods_and_Results"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/6/6f/METHODSANDRESULTSk.jpg" | ||
+ | style="width:15%; height:150px; border:2px solid #aaa; margin:-10px 5px 10px 0px;" | ||
+ | title="Methods and Results"> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2009.igem.org/Index-4.html"><img src=" | ||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/1/19/MODELLingy.gif" | ||
+ | style="width:15%; height:150px; border:2px solid #aaa; margin:-10px 5px 10px 0px;" | ||
+ | title="Modelling of Mechanism"> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2009.igem.org/2009.igem.org/metu-gene/parts"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/6/6a/Ads%C4%B1zk.jpg" | ||
+ | style="width:15%; height:15%; border:2px solid #aaa; margin:-10px 5px 10px 0px;" | ||
+ | title="Constructed Devices"> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:METU-Gene/Focus_on_our_Future"><img src=" | ||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/0/06/Focus_Logok.jpg" | ||
+ | style="width:150px; height:150px; border:4px solid #aaa; margin:-10px 5px 10px 0px;" | ||
+ | title="Focus on our Future!"></a></div></html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Wound Dressing Mechanism == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <html><div align="center" style="margin:15px 0px 0px 0px"><a href="https://2009.igem.org/2009.igem.org/metu-gene/parts"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 900px; height: 500px;" alt="w7" src="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/images/5/59/Mm.jpg"></a></div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
== Wound Dressing Layer Design == | == Wound Dressing Layer Design == | ||
Line 56: | Line 85: | ||
<!-- ***** New entry ***** --> | <!-- ***** New entry ***** --> | ||
<div class="main_item"> | <div class="main_item"> | ||
- | <h2>Recombinant hEGF | + | <h2>Recombinant hEGF released from collagen sponges</h2> |
<table> | <table> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 75: | Line 104: | ||
+ | <!-- ***** New entry ***** --> | ||
+ | <div class="main_item"> | ||
+ | <h2>The rhEGF release patterns from collagen sponges </h2> | ||
+ | <table> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td style="padding-right:20px;"> | ||
+ | <html><div align="center" style="padding-left: 66px; padding-top: 8px;"><img style="border: 0px solid ; width: 250px; height: 250px;" alt="w6" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/b/b0/Figure2.jpg"></a></div></html> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | <p style="font-size:110%; color:#576f91; font-family:georgia,serif;"><br><br>Three different types of crosslinking agents, GTA, genipin and ECD were used to prepare crosslinked collagen sponges. The rhEGF release patterns from collagen sponges are shown in Figure 2. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The drug release rate from crosslinked collagen sponges treated with EDC was the fastest, followed by collagen sponges treated with genipin and GTA, respectively. The EDC crosslinked collagen showed no release control effect, | ||
+ | which was probably due to the fact that EDC increased the water-solubility and lowered the viscosity of collagen (data | ||
+ | not shown). GTA crosslinked collagen showed the most potent release control effect than the other two (EDC and genipin). '''However, since we want controlled and orderly release system which will be improved our transgenic bacteria, we used genipin for formation our cellulose Wound Dressing layer in three different types of crosslinking agents, GTA, genipin and ECD.'''</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </div> <!-- close main item --> | ||
Line 82: | Line 131: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
<!-- close main item --></div> | <!-- close main item --></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:45, 21 October 2009
Contents |
Wound Dressing Mechanism
Wound Dressing Layer Design
Biomaterials Modelling
Characterization of the rhEGF-collagen sponges
The crosslinking degree could then be obtained from the differences between the absorbance values before and after
the crosslinking. The equation is as follows:
where s is the sample and ncl is non-crosslinked.
The water uptake of the collagen sponges was calculated using the following equation:
where Wd is the weight of the dry sponge and Ws is the weight of the swollen sponge.
To determine the possible release mechanism, drug release from collagen sponges was fitted to the following power model:
where Mt/M is the fractional drug release percentage at time t, and k is a constant related to the properties of the drug delivery system and n is the diffusional exponent which characterizes the drug transport mechanism.
Recombinant hEGF released from collagen sponges
|
The rhEGF release patterns from collagen sponges
|
Conclusion