Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico/Results
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→With system) |
(→Multipromoter) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
====Without system==== | ====Without system==== | ||
- | We already tried an experimient in wich we assumed a couple of things: all the phages are infecting a bacterium, all the cells were infected and almost all the bacteria died in the first round of infection. We know the number of bacteria due to the correlation obtained betwen UFC and OD.The burst size was calculated as the total number of phages produced divided by the total number of bacteria. The data from the first purification (1BS stock)indicate a burst size of 952 phages per bacterium. However the data from the 2BS stock indicate a burst size of | + | We already tried an experimient in wich we assumed a couple of things: all the phages are infecting a bacterium, all the cells were infected and almost all the bacteria died in the first round of infection. We know the number of bacteria due to the correlation obtained betwen UFC and OD.The burst size was calculated as the total number of phages produced divided by the total number of bacteria. The data from the first purification (1BS stock)indicate a burst size of 952 phages per bacterium. However the data from the 2BS stock indicate a burst size of 1,6000 phages per bacterium and surprisingly the data from the 3BS stock indicate a bigger number.<br> |
- | We know that this number is not possible because phage production is limited by the | + | We know that this number is not possible because phage production is limited by the host cellular resources. |
For this reason, we designed another experiment to measure the burst size. We will use the previous titrations to perform infections with just 1 or 0 phages per cell culture. We will let time to one lytic cycle, finally we are going to make plaques. We expect to see either the number of plaques representing the burst size or zero plaques, representing that we didn't take any phage. | For this reason, we designed another experiment to measure the burst size. We will use the previous titrations to perform infections with just 1 or 0 phages per cell culture. We will let time to one lytic cycle, finally we are going to make plaques. We expect to see either the number of plaques representing the burst size or zero plaques, representing that we didn't take any phage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Wild type burst size determinations and expectations has been modeled and predicted by our [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:Molecular_model |stochastic molecular models]], [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:WTM |WTM]] has generated [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:BSD |BSDs]] supported by experimentally determined data. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Theoretical BSDs have been generated by [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:KZM |KZM]], this Distributions correspond to the Kamikaze behavior. | ||
====With system==== | ====With system==== | ||
- | We will repeat the experiments performed in the "Without system" that give us a result congruent with the literature. In this case, we expect the number of plaques to decrease drastically in number and size. In the best case We wont se any plaque. | + | We will repeat the experiments performed in the "Without system" part that give us a result congruent with the literature. In this case, we expect the number of plaques to decrease drastically in number and size. In the best case We wont se any plaque. |
===Test parts and devices=== | ===Test parts and devices=== | ||
Line 45: | Line 49: | ||
====Multipromoter==== | ====Multipromoter==== | ||
- | [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:Journals:Uriel#October | + | [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:Journals:Uriel#October 7, 2009|Functionality was tested]] qualitatively using the strain [https://2009.igem.org/Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico/Resources/Strains BL21(DE3)pLysS] which has an IPTG inducible T7 RNA polymerase. Different conditions were tested: Bl21/multipromoter IPTG+, Bl21/multipromoter IPTG- and Bl21/no-multipromoter IPTG+. |
[[Image:Gfp multi.JPG|300px]] | [[Image:Gfp multi.JPG|300px]] | ||
Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
The colicines (E3 and E9) will be under the transcriptional regulation of the promoter induced by IPTG. We will do another curve using the same procedure described in the section [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico/Wet_Lab/Experiments#T3 and T7 infection plot|phage infection curve]] but without phages and with the induction with IPTG in the time zero. We expect the growth curve obtained to decay before than that of the phages infection curve because we want the toxic activity of the toxins will be faster enough to kill the bacteria before the phages. We will feedback the model with these results. | The colicines (E3 and E9) will be under the transcriptional regulation of the promoter induced by IPTG. We will do another curve using the same procedure described in the section [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico/Wet_Lab/Experiments#T3 and T7 infection plot|phage infection curve]] but without phages and with the induction with IPTG in the time zero. We expect the growth curve obtained to decay before than that of the phages infection curve because we want the toxic activity of the toxins will be faster enough to kill the bacteria before the phages. We will feedback the model with these results. | ||
- | This phenomenon | + | This phenomenon has been studied in the theoretical [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:Molecular_model |molecular models]], [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:KZM |KZM]] and [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:WTM |WTM]]. KZM has generated [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:BSD |Burst size Distribution.]] |
===T3 and T7 infection plot=== | ===T3 and T7 infection plot=== |
Latest revision as of 03:30, 22 October 2009