Team:Minnesota/Project

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(9 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|}
|}
 +
{| style="color:gold;background-color:#800000;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" border="1" bordercolor="#fff" width="90%" align="center"
{| style="color:gold;background-color:#800000;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" border="1" bordercolor="#fff" width="90%" align="center"
{| style="color:gold;background-color:#800000;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" border="1" bordercolor="#fff" width="90%" align="center"
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota|<font color="gold">Home</font>]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota|<font color="gold">Home</font>]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Team|<font color="gold">The Team</font>]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Team|<font color="gold">The Team</font>]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Project|<font color="gold">The Project</font>]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Project|<font color="gold">The Project</font>]]
-
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Parts|<font color="gold">Submitted Parts</font>]]
+
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Designer|<font color="gold">SynBioSS Designer</font>]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Modeling|<font color="gold">Modeling</font>]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Modeling|<font color="gold">Modeling</font>]]
-
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Designer|<font color="gold">SynBioSS Designer</font>]]
+
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Notebook|<font color="gold">Experimental</font>]]
-
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Parts Characterization|<font color="gold">Parts Characterization</font>]]
+
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Parts Characterization|<font color="gold">Competition Requirements</font>]]
-
!align="center"|[[Team:Minnesota/Notebook|<font color="gold">Experiments and Calendar</font>]]
+
-
 
+
|}
|}
<h1>The Project</h1>
<h1>The Project</h1>
 +
Although, we will only be judged for the software tools we have developed, we have also experimentally constructed, built and tested BioBricks that function as logical AND gates. The most important aspect of our work is that we combined simulations and experiments.
 +
 +
<h2> SynBioSS Designer (https://2009.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Designer) </h2>
<h2>AND Gates</h2>
<h2>AND Gates</h2>
<h3> How they work</h3>
<h3> How they work</h3>
Line 28: Line 30:
</ul>
</ul>
-
<h2> tetO2 mutants </h2>
 
Line 34: Line 35:
-
 
+
<h2> tetO2 mutants </h2>
-
 
+
The tetO2 operator site is a 19bp palindromic DNA sequence which is tightly bound by the dimer TetR, repressing the expression of downstream genes in the absence of an inducer. Helbl and Hillen have documented several mutations of tetO2 and the binding affinities of wild-type and mutant TetR for them. Since TetR is a dimer which binds both sides of the palindrome in the same way, each of these mutations were also made at the same location on both sides of the palindrome.  
-
 
+
[[Image:TetO2.tiff|frame]]
-
 
+
-
<h2>Methods</h2>
+
-
 
+
-
<h3>Preparing Competent Cells</h3>
+
-
<ol>
+
-
<li>Grow a streak isolation plate overnight for TOP10 and DH5αPro cells.</li>
+
-
<li>Inoculate single colony from the freshly streaked plate to 2 ml LB media.</li>
+
-
<li>Grow culture for 16 hours at 37 °C and 220 RPM</li>
+
-
<li>Then inoculate 80 ml of media with 800 µl of the culture and grow for 2 hours at 37 °C and 220 RPM.</li>
+
-
<li>Shake the culture in an ice bath for 10 minutes while chilling 4 50 ml tubes.</li>
+
-
<li>Transfer the culture into 2 50 ml tubes for both TOP10 and DH5αPro</li>
+
-
<li>Spin the culture at 5000 RPM and 4 °C (maintain this temperature as much as possible at this point).  Throw the supernatant.</li>
+
-
<li>Add 20 ml of chilled 100mM CaCl2 to the tube and re-suspend by vortexing</li>
+
-
<li>Incubate on ice for 40 minutes</li>
+
-
<li>Spin culture at 4500 RPM and 4 °C for 10 minutes. Throw the supernatant.</li>
+
-
<li>Add 3.5 ml of 100 mM CaCl2 and 1.5 ml of 50% Glycerol and gently re-suspend by tapping the tube (do not vortex). Pre-chill micro centrifuge tubes.</li>
+
-
<li>Transfer 200 µl of the culture to the micro centrifuge tubes, snap freeze and store at -80 °C.</li>
+

Latest revision as of 18:33, 20 October 2009

Mnlogo.jpg
Home The Team The Project SynBioSS Designer Modeling Experimental Competition Requirements

Contents

The Project

Although, we will only be judged for the software tools we have developed, we have also experimentally constructed, built and tested BioBricks that function as logical AND gates. The most important aspect of our work is that we combined simulations and experiments.

SynBioSS Designer (https://2009.igem.org/Team:Minnesota/Designer)

AND Gates

How they work

ANDgatetable.jpg
AND Gates are logic circuits that produce an output if and only if two inputs are present. For example, our system produces GFP only if two small molecules named aTc and IPTG are present. If one of them is not present, no GFP will be produced. Ideally an AND gate will obey the truth table shown to the right, where 1 means the input is present, and 0 means that it is not.

In order to get this behavior, we take advantage of the structure of promoter sequences in prokaryotes. When RNA polymerase (more specifically, the sigma factor) binds to the promoter, it binds to region at -35 and -10 relative to the transcriptional start site. Since the entire sequence is not used by the sigma factor, there are three regions of DNA that can be changed to provide AND gate behavior. These are the upstream of -35, between -35 and -10, and downstream of -10. In each of these sites, we can place a DNA sequence that is preferentially bound by proteins in the cell. For this case, the two proteins are TetR and LacI, both of which are constitutively produced by our strain of E. coli(DH5-alpha-pro). In each of the three sites, either a lacO or tetO2 operator can replace the normal DNA. In order to create an AND gate, at least one of these sites must be a tetO2 operator and one must be a lacO operator.

ANDgate.jpg

We studied the potential of a synthetic, single promoter AND gate. This helps us understand at a fundamental level what is happening in a network with multiple regulators and opens further research paths. The device consists of parts of the Tet (tetracycline) and Lac (lactose) operons and responds to commonly used inducers IPTG (Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside) and aTc (anhydortetracycline). Three or fewer of these operators can be combined to form a promoter and the order and quantity of each operator site result in different constructs, that is, given three blank spots for operators on a promoter and the choice of either -, T or L for each spot, there are a variety of possible promoter designs. "-" represents a region of non-coding DNA from λ phage functions as a "null" operator site; no proteins in our E. coli strain should specifically bind it. "T" represents the tetO2 operator site, and "L" represents the lacO operator site. A number of these constructs were built in the Kaznessis lab using wild-type operator sites prior to this summer's iGEM team project. To tune and more thoroughly understand the function of these constructs, we replaced the wild-type tetO2 operator sites with several mutants which we found in the literature. We chose to focus on three constructs:

  • T T L
  • T T -
  • T - -




tetO2 mutants

The tetO2 operator site is a 19bp palindromic DNA sequence which is tightly bound by the dimer TetR, repressing the expression of downstream genes in the absence of an inducer. Helbl and Hillen have documented several mutations of tetO2 and the binding affinities of wild-type and mutant TetR for them. Since TetR is a dimer which binds both sides of the palindrome in the same way, each of these mutations were also made at the same location on both sides of the palindrome. File:TetO2.tiff