Team:Chiba/Project/Delay Switch
From 2009.igem.org
(→Exp #3' LuxR Mutants (One More Plan : Direct Screening for Delay Switcher)) |
|||
(13 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
==== [https://2008.igem.org/Team:Chiba/Experiments:copy_number Exp #2 Balancing Player] ==== | ==== [https://2008.igem.org/Team:Chiba/Experiments:copy_number Exp #2 Balancing Player] ==== | ||
:In this section, we intended to create time-delay by altering the amount of luxR protein per cell. Since the amount of LuxR that receives AHL differs, we hypothesized that the time required to reach the threshold AHL concentration will differ. | :In this section, we intended to create time-delay by altering the amount of luxR protein per cell. Since the amount of LuxR that receives AHL differs, we hypothesized that the time required to reach the threshold AHL concentration will differ. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== [https://2008.igem.org/Team:Chiba/Experiments:LuxR_mutants Exp #3 LuxR Mutants] ==== | ||
+ | :Probably, the most straightforward approach to make variations in delay time is to create a number of LuxR mutants with different sensitivity. We thought the higher the sensitivity is, the shorter the delay time would be. The lower the sensitivity is, the slower the switch response should be. | ||
==== [https://2008.igem.org/Team:Chiba/Project/Experiments:Sender_Crosstalk Exp #4 Spoken to by Foreigners]==== | ==== [https://2008.igem.org/Team:Chiba/Project/Experiments:Sender_Crosstalk Exp #4 Spoken to by Foreigners]==== | ||
Line 106: | Line 109: | ||
=== Experiments (2009) === | === Experiments (2009) === | ||
- | |||
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0px" cellspacing="5px" style="font-family:'Century Gothic', sans-serif;" | {| width="100%" cellpadding="0px" cellspacing="5px" style="font-family:'Century Gothic', sans-serif;" | ||
|- style="background:#BC8F8FF; height:100px;" valign="top" | |- style="background:#BC8F8FF; height:100px;" valign="top" | ||
|style="width:5%;"| | |style="width:5%;"| | ||
|style="width:95%;"| | |style="width:95%;"| | ||
- | ==== | + | ==== Exp #3' LuxR Mutants (One More Plan : Direct Screening for Delay Switcher) ==== |
- | : | + | :In this plan, we introduced the random mutation into the entire reading frame of LuxR using error-prone PCR. |
+ | The mutants plasmid would be transformed with LuxP-gfp plasmid into E coli. Colonies were lifted onto nitrocellulose filter and placed on the top of lawn of Lux-senders. Over time, we kept watching the colony hue. Colonies should turn green when they detect the message passing through the NC filter. We were looking for the colony that turns green significantly after those of wildtype. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <html><img src=" | ||
+ | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/b/b7/%E5%9B%B31.png" width="600" height="400" |right> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== Results (2009) === | === Results (2009) === |
Latest revision as of 15:23, 27 September 2009
|
E.coli Time Manager Since 2008
Constructing A Delay Switch Since 2008In principle, there are three ways to delay the activation of chemical communications;
Inter-species communications! We decided to go for the strategy inspired by Japanese-classic experience; Whenever we speak to somebody in English, we often experience a certain delay in activating the communication. We though this is exactly what we pursued in. See Exp #4. Same applies to the reverse, too. When somebody speaks to us, we definitely need some time (sometime infinite) to get activated. This is all in spite that he/ she was loud and clear enough. The less affinity (perception) we have to English, the longer we need to activate them.See exp #5. Experiments (2008)For details, click each of the index titles
Results (2008)In conclusion, we tried (and are trying) to device a series of delay-switches by designing the "switching consortia". We got limited, by certain success in generating delay switches. Experiments (2009)
Results (2009) |