Team:Duke
From 2009.igem.org
Line 187: | Line 187: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/d/d0/Dukelogo.gif" width="15%" alt="Duke logo" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/d/d0/Dukelogo.gif" width="15%" alt="Duke logo" /> | ||
</A> </div><table class="links"> <tr> <td align="center" ><a id="show-home">Home</a></td><td align="center" ><a id="show-project">Project</a></td><td align="center" ><a id="show-notebook">Notebook</a></td><td align="center" ><a id="show-team">Team</a></td><td align="center" > | </A> </div><table class="links"> <tr> <td align="center" ><a id="show-home">Home</a></td><td align="center" ><a id="show-project">Project</a></td><td align="center" ><a id="show-notebook">Notebook</a></td><td align="center" ><a id="show-team">Team</a></td><td align="center" > | ||
- | </td></tr> </table></center><div id="home-box" | + | </td></tr> </table></center><div id="home-box"> |
- | <IMG SRC="https:// | + | <IMG SRC="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/1/10/Duke.jpg"> |
</div><div id="project-box"> | </div><div id="project-box"> | ||
<h1> Project </h1><p>The process of high-throughput cloning is bottlenecked at | <h1> Project </h1><p>The process of high-throughput cloning is bottlenecked at |
Revision as of 02:03, 17 October 2009
Home | Project | Notebook | Team |
Project
The process of high-throughput cloning is bottlenecked at the retriction and ligation stages. A combination of high costs, requirements for restriction site specific enzymes and general inefficiency of the process makes cloning on a large combinatorial gene library unviable. Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC) addresses this issue by eliminating the need for restriction and ligation enzymes and thereby streamlining and condensing the procedure into the duration of 5 minutes. An extremely simple theory, CPEC piggybacks PCR in splicing genes. Figure 1 below outlines how CPEC may be used to insert a gene into a vector.
The gene insert is modified to have ends that overlap with the ends of the linearlized vector and both have similar melting temperatures. The insert and vector are placed within a PCR machine in the absence of primers. Denaturation separates the double-stranded insert and vector and the overlapping ends anneal. Polymerase extension mechanism is then used to complete the plasmid.
We will apply CPEC in the construction of a multi-component plasmid containing biobricks. Previous Duke iGEM projects have yielded the genes in a metabolic pathway that synthesizes poly(3HB-co-4HB), a biodegradable plastic, in E. coli. We will transform those genes into biobricks, with sticky ends, and efficiently combine them in a vector using CPEC.
Notebook
6/3/09
Experiment: PCR with contents of
tube labeled 7 as DNA template, Gel with 100 bp ladder to check PCR
Results:
Incorrect ladder and template
Conclusion: Should use 1 kb ladder, Need to
find correct template
6/4/09
E: Gel to check Bioplastics #1-5
R:
All correct sized bands
C: Use one as template for PCR
E: PCR with
Bioplastics #5 as template
5x HF buffer 5 ul
dNTPs 2 ul
forward
primer 1.25 ul
reverse primer 1.25 ul
DNA template (plasmid) 0.5 ul
Phusion
DNA polymerase 0.3 ul
H2O 14.7 ul
25 ul
98°C 30s 1x
98°C
15s
55°C 30s
72°C 1m 10s 35x
72°C 5m
4°C infinity
1x
Fragment # Name Size/Length
1 pASKphaA 4.2 kb
2 phaB 900 bp
3 Termcat2 1.7 kb
4 phaC 1.9 kb
6/5/09
E: Gel to check PCR
R:
Correct band for fragments 2 and 4, No band for fragments 1 and 3
C: Cut correct
bands out of gel, Try PCR with another template, different conditions
E:
PCR with Bioplastics #1 as template, increased extension time to 1m 20s
6/6/09
R:
Correct band for fragments 1 (weak) and 2, No band for fragments 3 and 4
C:
Cut out correct bands, Do PCR again with same template for fragments 1 and 2,
Try PCR with different template for fragments 3 and 4
E: PCR with Bioplastics
#1 (fragments 1 and 2) and #3 (fragments 3 and 4) as templates
6/8/09
E:
Gel to check PCR, Gel with leftover PCR of right sized fragments
R: Correct
bands for all fragments
C: Cut out bands
6/9/09
Gel Extraction
1.
Weigh cut gel piece(s). Add at least 1 ul binding buffer per mg of gel.
2.
Place tube at 50-60°C for 10-15 min or until gel is completely dissolved.
Vortex every few minutes.
3. Add solution to spin column. Centrifuge at max
speed for 30s. Discard filtrate.
4. Add 300 ul binding buffer to column. Centrifuge
for 30s. Discard filtrate.
5. Add 500 ul wash buffer. Centrifuge for 30s. Discard
filtrate.
6. Repeat step 5.
7. Centrifuge tubes for at least 2 min. Discard
collection tube.
8. Obtain 1.7 ml centrifuge tube. Add 40-50 ul elution buffer
to spin column. Centrifuge for 1 min. Discard spin column.
E: Measured
concentration of DNA fragments
R: Very low concentrations of fragments 1 and
3
C: Do PCR with fragments as template, greater volume to increase amount
E: PCR with fragments 1 and 3 as templates
6/10/09
E:
Gel to check PCR
R: Smears at bottom of gel
C: Should use Bioplastics
#1 as template to increase amount of fragment 1 and Bioplastics #3 as template
to increase amount of fragment
E: PCR with Bioplastics #1 and #3 as templates
and doubled volume, Gel to obtain more of fragments
R: Smears for fragment
1, Correct bands for fragment 2, Correct bands and smears for fragment 3
C:
PCR with different conditions
E: PCR with Bioplastics #3 as template,
extension time increased to 1m 30s, cycles increased to 40
6/11/09
E:
Gels to check PCR
R: Correct bands for fragment 1, 2 and 4 and possibly correct
band for fragment 3
C: Cut out bands
E: Measured concentration of
DNA fragments
R: Still low concentrations of fragments 1 and 3
C: Do more
PCRs to obtain more of fragments 1 and 3
6/15/09
E:
PCRs with Bioplastics #1 (fragments 1 and 2) and #3 (fragments 3 and 4) as templates,
doubled volume, eliminated annealing step, varied extension (plus annealing) time
based on fragment size, Gels to check PCRs
5x HF buffer 10 ul
dNTPs
4 ul
forward primer 2.5 ul
reverse primer 2.5 ul
DNA template (plasmid)
1 ul
Phusion DNA polymerase 0.8 ul
H2O 29.2 ul
50 ul
98°C
30s 1x
98°C 15s
72°C varies 35x
72°C 5m
4°C infinity
1x
Annealing Time: 30s
Extension Time: 15 s * size/length (kb)
Fragment # Name Size/Length (bp) Time (s)
1 pASKphaA 4215 100
2 phaB
896 50
3 Termcat2 1701 60
4 phaC 1872 65
R: Bands for fragments
1 and 2, No bands for fragments 3 and 4
C: Cut out bands of fragments 1 and
2, PCR again to obtain fragments 3 and 4
6/16/09
E: PCR with Bioplastics
#2 as template and Phusion mix (done by Maggie), Gels to check PCRs
2x
Phusion mix 25 ul
forward primer 2.5 ul
reverse primer 2.5 ul
DNA template
(plasmid) 1 ul
H2O 19 ul
50 ul
R: No bands for fragments 3, Bands
for fragment 4
C: Cut out bands of fragment 4, PCR again to obtain fragment
3
E: Measured concentration of DNA fragments 1 and 2
R: Concentrations
okay
C: Do assembly PCR once enough of fragments 3 and 4 obtained
6/17/09
E:
PCR with Bioplastics #4 as template, using Phusion enzyme protocol (shorter denaturation
time, lower annealing temperature), Gel to check PCRs
98°C 15s 1x
98°C
1s
50°C 5s
72°C 30s 35x
72°C 2m
4°C infinity 1x
R: Correct bands
C: Cut out bands
E: Measured concentration of
DNA fragments 3 and 4
R: Concentrations high
C: Do assembly PCR
6/18/09
E: Assembly PCR, Gels to check PCRs
2x Phusion mix 12.5 ul
insert
7.14 ul
H2O 5.36 ul
25 ul
98°C 30s 1x
98°C 10s
70-55°C
5s
72°C 30s 25x
72°C 2m
4°C infinity 1x
Fragment
# Name Size/Length (bp) Concentration (ng/ul) Mass (ng) Volume (ul)
1 pASKphaA
4215 41 194 4.73
2 phaB 896 68 41 0.60
3 Termcat2 1701 69 78 1.13
4 phaC
1872 126 86 0.68
~400 7.14
Length of plasmid: 8360 bp + 4 Histags
* 6 aa * 3 bp = 8432 bp
R: Smear because of misformed gel,
no band
C: Change conditions
6/19/09
E: Assembly PCR (done by Maggie)
with different conditions (decreased extension time, increased number of cycles)
5x HF buffer 5 ul
dNTPs 2 ul
insert 7.18 ul
Phusion DNA polymerase
0.4 ul
H2O 10.42 ul
25 ul
98°C 30s 1x
98°C 10s
70-55°C
30s
72°C 2m 40x
72°C 5m
4°C infinity 1x
Fragment
# Name Mass (ng) Volume (ul)
1 pASKphaA 195.3 4.76
2 phaB 41 0.60
3 Termcat2
78.4 1.14
4 phaC 86.4 0.68
~400 7.14
6/20/09
E: Gel to check PCR
R:
Correct band (faint)
C: Low efficiency, Use different method (Infusion kit
or PCR with 2 fragments first)
6/22/09
LB Agar Plates with Chlorophenicol
(CAM), anhydrotetracycline, Nile Red (NR)
stock plate
CAM 50 mg/ul 20 ug/ml
anhyd
2 mg/ml 150 ng/ml
NR 0.25 mg/ml 0.5 ug/ml
E: PCR with fragments 1 and
2 and different conditions (decreased annealing and extension times and number
of cycles), Gel to check PCR
2x Phusion mix 12.5 ul
pASKphaA 4.76
ul
phaB 0.60 ul
H2O 7.14 ul
25 ul
98°C 30s 1x
98°C
10s
70-55°C 10s
72°C 1m 10s 20x
72°C 5m
4°C infinity
1x
R: No band/smear
C: Change conditions
6/23/09
E: Assembly
PCR with different conditions (no slow ramp)
6/24/09
E: Gel to check
PCR
R: Correct band (faint)
C: Do transformation with competent cells
6/24/09
Transformation with High Efficiency GC5 Competent Cells
1. Remove competent
cells from -70°C and place on ice. Thaw for 5-10 min.
2. Gently mix cells
by tapping tube.
3. Add 1-50 ng DNA (1 ul control) into 50 ul cells. Swirl
pipette tip while dispensing DNA. Gently tap tube to mix.
4. Place tubes on
ice for 30 min.
5. Heat-shock cells for 45 sec in 42°C (water) bath. Do
not shake!
6. Add 450 ul RT SOC Medium to each transformation reaction.
7.
Incubate at 37°C for 1 hr with shaking at 225-250 rpm.
8. Spread on LB
agar plates containing appropriate antibiotic.
9. Incubate plates at 37°C
overnight (12-16 hrs).
6/26/09
Pick a colony from a streaked selective
plate to inoculate 10 ml of LB medium supplemented with the appropriate selection
antibiotic. Incubate 12-18 hrs at 37°C while shaking at 200-250 rpm.
6/27/09
Harvest
bacterial culture by centrifuging at 8000 rpm (6800xg) in microcentrifuge for
2 min at RT. Decant supernatant and remove remaining medium.
Purification/Mini
prep
1. Resuspend pelleted cells in 250 ul Resuspension Solution. Vortex or
pipet up and down until no cell clumps remain.
2. Add 250 Lysis Solution and
mix thoroughly by inverting tube 4-6 times until solution becomes viscous and
slightly clear. Do not incubate for more than 5 min to avoid denaturation of supercoiled
plasmid DNA.
3. Add 350 ul Neutralization Solution and mix thoroughly by inverting
tube 4-6 times.
4. Centrifuge for 5 min to pellet cell debris and chromosomal
DNA.
5. Transfer supernatant to spin column by decanting or pipetting. Avoid
disturbing or transferring white precipitate.
6. Centrifuge for 1 min. Discard
flow-through and replace column in collection tube.
7. Add 500 ul Wash Solution
to spin column. Centrifuge for 30-60s and discard flow-through.
8. Repeat step
7.
9. Centrifuge for 1 min to remove residual Wash Solution.
10. Transfer
spin column into fresh 1.7 ml microcentrifuge tube. Add 50 ul Elution Buffer to
center of spin column membrane. Do not touch pipette tip to membrane. Incubate
2 min at RT and centrifuge for 2 min.
Note: An additional elution step with
Elution buffer or water will recover residual DNA from the membrane and increase
overall yield by 10-20%.
11. Discard column and store purified plasmid DNA
at -20°C.
6/29/09
E: Restriction digests, Gel to check digests
Digest 1
NdeI (FastDigest) 1 ul
SpeI (NEB) 1 ul
10x FastDigest buffer
2 ul
plasmid 1 ul (~100 ng)
H2O 15 ul
20 ul
Band Sizes/Lengths: 5
kb, 3 kb, 460 bp, (80bp)
Digest 2 (Did not do)
NdeI (FastDigest) 2
ul
10x FastDigest buffer 2 ul
plasmid 1 ul (~100 ng)
H2O 15 ul
20
ul
Band Sizes/Lengths: 5.4 kb, 3 kb
Digest 3
BamHI (FastDigest)
1 ul
XhoI (FastDigest) 1 ul
10x FastDigest buffer 2 ul
plasmid 1 ul (~100
ng)
H2O 15 ul
20 ul
Band Sizes/Lengths: 6.6 kb, 1.8 kb
Digest
4
BamHI (FastDigest) 2 ul
10x FastDigest buffer 2 ul
plasmid 1 ul (~100
ng)
H2O 15 ul
20 ul
Band Size/Length: 8.4 kb
R: Correct bands
and sizes for plasmid 2 and digests 1, 3, and 4, correct band and size for plasmid
4
C: Do more tests on plasmid 2 such as sequencing to determine if plasmid
is carryover, Try different primers
About our Team
Advisors
Dr. Jingdong Tian
Undergraduates
{| |[[Image:Sahil.jpg|200px]] |'''Sahil "Mr Baller" Prasada'''A remarkable individual of considerable talent, ability, and girth, the esteemed Mr. Prasada is the latest addition to Duke's elite iGEM team. His innumerable achievments span many varied fields, earning numerous recognitions at innovation summits (for his humor), at tennis tourneys (for his egregious sportsmanship), and at local dances (for his exaggerated gyrations of the hip) among others. His research interests are likewise broad, and as one of the best and brightest young minds of our time, he is very excited to share his latest findings with you at iGEM this November. Sahil aspires to be a cardiologist, just like his father, when he grows up. His favorite hobbies include tennis, kangaroo-watching, eating, and bhangra dancing. Sahil's academic interests include yeast mating, doxorubicin, and hydrogen fuels. |- |[[Image:kchien.jpg|200px]] |'''Kevin Chien'''
A reformed Carolina fan. |}