Team:Berkeley Software/Misc
From 2009.igem.org
(→Eugene) |
(→Eugene) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Eugene=== | ===Eugene=== | ||
# Add a way to express relation of parts in a device to resulting transcripts - Fall 2009 | # Add a way to express relation of parts in a device to resulting transcripts - Fall 2009 | ||
- | + | #* Currently there is no way of cleaning saying which parts are associated to a particular transcript after transcription. It would be ideal to have a way to do this so that rules can be applied on a transcript based level. | |
# Add support for rules over part definitions (i.e. not just part instances) - Fall 2009 | # Add support for rules over part definitions (i.e. not just part instances) - Fall 2009 | ||
# More completely support SB/DTP (Synthetic Biology Data Transfer Protocol) with XML export and import - Spring 2010 | # More completely support SB/DTP (Synthetic Biology Data Transfer Protocol) with XML export and import - Spring 2010 |
Revision as of 22:10, 18 October 2009
Miscellaneous
Contents |
This page covers a number of different topics which did not fit nicely within any of the other pages in this wiki. Here we provide a draft specification/roadmap for the next version of many of the projects here (who knows these could be a part of iGEM 2010). In addition we discuss our collaborations, efforts in standardization, and how our project relates to human practices.
Draft Specification
This section details a draft specification for the next version of Eugene, Spectacles, and the Clotho environment. These specification descriptions assume the reader is familiar with the current state of the projects (i.e. has read the appropriate pages on this wiki). The specs involve an ordered list of tasks along with approximate dates when these should be completed by.
Eugene
- Add a way to express relation of parts in a device to resulting transcripts - Fall 2009
- Currently there is no way of cleaning saying which parts are associated to a particular transcript after transcription. It would be ideal to have a way to do this so that rules can be applied on a transcript based level.
- Add support for rules over part definitions (i.e. not just part instances) - Fall 2009
- More completely support SB/DTP (Synthetic Biology Data Transfer Protocol) with XML export and import - Spring 2010
- Add support for a completely expressive control statement set (e.g. if, while, for) - Spring 2010
Spectacles
- Advanced testing more integrated with the completion of whole design flows - Fall 2009
- More advanced database support of assignment of physical parts - Fall 2009
- Visual rule enforcement - Spring 2010
Clotho
- Complete/Test flow for basic part creation - Fall 2009
- Complete/Test flow for full device creation - Fall 2009
- Integrate Clotho with JBEI's registry - Fall 2009
- Complete SPAM tool's oligo coverage designer and golden gate part packager - Fall 2009
- Test data model with Davidson University's GCATalog based registry - Spring 2010
Collaboration
For all of our projects, we worked with a number of different groups both to make our tools more visible, as well as get valuable feedback. This section discusses some of these collaborations.
UC Berkeley iGEM team - we worked very closely with our wet team counter parts to tie our Kepler based assembly workflows with the Beckman Coulter BioMek 3000 liquid handling robot that they used. In addition we beta tested our software with them, incorporated their feedback, and ran tutorial sessions on Clotho use and how to write Clotho plug-ins.
Stanford iGEM team - we provided early versions of Spectacles to the Stanford iGEM team so that they could test it out. In addition we worked with them to incorporate new iconography as they added it to the SBOL Visual effort.
University of Minnesota - Emma Weeding worked with us
Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI) -
Valencia - In addition to many other iGEM teams, we filled out their survey and received a gold medal (100% team participation).
Support for New Technical Standard
This entire project is very tied to the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/The_BioBricks_Foundation:Standards/Technical/Exchange Synthetic Biology Open Language] (SBOL) effort. This is a set of three activities related to the standardization of a number of required synthetic biology concepts with the goal of facilitating software development. We contributed in the following ways.
SBOL Visual- We worked with Suzie Bartram and Cesar Rodriquez at Stanford to make sure that Spectacles was 100% compliant with the the SBOL Visual standard. This included support to assign functional concepts to the icons as well as providing a very smooth upgrade path in the event the images evolve.
SBOL Semantic - By revamping the Clotho data model we have enabled the internal structure of Clotho to adapt to new ideas regarding the representation of biological data. Bing Xia and Douglas Densmore participated in the SB Data Exchange working group meeting at Stanford on 26/07/2009. Clotho as a project is committed to the support of this standard.
SBOL Script - SBOL scriupt is an effort to develop a human readable specific. Eugene has been created to be a super-set of the eventual SBOL script. A key piece that we added support for in Eugene is the exporting of Eugene as an XML description. This will lead to the manipulation of Eugene by other tools as well as translating Eugene into a more restricted form which will be SBOL script.
Human Practices
Related Links
iGEM 2009 Berkeley Wet Lab Team
[http://openwetware.org/wiki/The_BioBricks_Foundation:Standards/Technical/Exchange SBOL Effort]
[http://groups.google.com/group/synbiodex Synthetic Biology Data Exchange Group]