Team:Utah State/Modeling
From 2009.igem.org
Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
Simulations | Simulations | ||
</font></b></i> | </font></b></i> | ||
- | <p class = "class">Simulations for the Sec pathways were run for 5400 seconds (1.5 hours), which allowed the number of periplasmic to reach approximately steady state. The simulation for the Sec pathway secretion model is shown below as Figure 3. | + | <p class = "class">Simulations for the Sec pathways were run for 5400 seconds (1.5 hours), which allowed the number of periplasmic to reach approximately steady state. The simulation for the Sec pathway secretion model is shown below as Figure 3. |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
Protein generated by the <i>E. coli</i> cell reaches steady state quickly, as it is both produced and translocated in to the periplasm rapidly. The periplasmic protein reaches approximately 90 proteins upon achieving steady state. The long settling time and high number of periplasmic protein are a result of the long protein degradation time.</p> | Protein generated by the <i>E. coli</i> cell reaches steady state quickly, as it is both produced and translocated in to the periplasm rapidly. The periplasmic protein reaches approximately 90 proteins upon achieving steady state. The long settling time and high number of periplasmic protein are a result of the long protein degradation time.</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/b/b4/Model3.png" align = "middle" height="400" style="padding:.5px; border-style:solid; border-color:#999" alt="Figure 3"> </div> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"><font size="2.5" face="Helvetica, Arial, San Serif" color =#231f20> | ||
+ | <b>Figure 3.</b> Simulation of protein production and translocation by the Sec pathway | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
<p class= "class">Simulations for the Tat pathway were run for 3600 seconds (1 hour). The shorter length of simulation relative to the Sec model is used despite having significantly longer protein translocation time because the time-consuming folding step limits the reaction. The results of the ordinary differential equation simulation are shown below in Figure 4. The amount of periplasmic protein is lower than cytoplasmic and folded protein values upon reaching steady state. This is due to the rate-limiting folding step, which also leads to an expected high concentration of folded protein as well. | <p class= "class">Simulations for the Tat pathway were run for 3600 seconds (1 hour). The shorter length of simulation relative to the Sec model is used despite having significantly longer protein translocation time because the time-consuming folding step limits the reaction. The results of the ordinary differential equation simulation are shown below in Figure 4. The amount of periplasmic protein is lower than cytoplasmic and folded protein values upon reaching steady state. This is due to the rate-limiting folding step, which also leads to an expected high concentration of folded protein as well. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/b/b2/Model4.png" align = "middle" height="400" style="padding:.5px; border-style:solid; border-color:#999" alt="Figure 4"> </div> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <div align="center"><font size="2.5" face="Helvetica, Arial, San Serif" color =#231f20> | ||
+ | <b>Figure 2.</b> Simulation of protein production, folding, and translocation by the Tat pathway | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<p class = "class"> The accuracy of models, such as those constructed, will increase as more knowledge about the time step parameters for each of the mechanisms is determined. These improvements will allow for a better comparison of the two secretion methods, which can lead to better signal peptide selection (and corresponding pathway selection) for the protein in question. Future work could also include incorporating promoter strength into the model to affect transcription rates to provide a more accurate depiction of what is happening inside the cell. Better correlation between these parameters and the model will result in a more useful aid in when studying protein secretion. | <p class = "class"> The accuracy of models, such as those constructed, will increase as more knowledge about the time step parameters for each of the mechanisms is determined. These improvements will allow for a better comparison of the two secretion methods, which can lead to better signal peptide selection (and corresponding pathway selection) for the protein in question. Future work could also include incorporating promoter strength into the model to affect transcription rates to provide a more accurate depiction of what is happening inside the cell. Better correlation between these parameters and the model will result in a more useful aid in when studying protein secretion. | ||
</p> | </p> |
Revision as of 05:44, 21 October 2009
|
|