"
Minnesota/16 July 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|'''[[Minnesota/15 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 15)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/17 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 17)]]''' | |'''[[Minnesota/15 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 15)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/17 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 17)]]''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
| - | <br> | + | '''Patrick'''<br> |
| + | In order to check the validity of the assumption made yesterday, I checked one of the methods discussed. The idea that dividing the amount of nsDNA to reduce competition by 300x may lead to more accurate results.<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''smad_ttn_base_nsDNA''' was created by dividing the initial concentration of nsDNA (500000) by 300 to give 1670.<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Ben'''<br> | ||
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky31.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br> | [[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky31.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:47, 30 July 2009
| Back to Notebook Home | |
| Go to Previous Day (July 15) | Go to Next Day (July 17) |
Patrick
In order to check the validity of the assumption made yesterday, I checked one of the methods discussed. The idea that dividing the amount of nsDNA to reduce competition by 300x may lead to more accurate results.
smad_ttn_base_nsDNA was created by dividing the initial concentration of nsDNA (500000) by 300 to give 1670.
Ben
