Team:Imperial College London/M2
From 2009.igem.org
(→Our results) |
(→Our results) |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
- | < | + | <right> |
<div class="highslide-gallery"> | <div class="highslide-gallery"> | ||
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/6/61/LacIpLARcsBTC.png" class="highslide" onclick="return hs.expand(this, config1)"> | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/6/61/LacIpLARcsBTC.png" class="highslide" onclick="return hs.expand(this, config1)"> | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | </ | + | </right> |
</html> | </html> | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
Unfortunately, we did not have time to ligate together both OtsA and OtsB and were therefore unable to do any functional assays. | Unfortunately, we did not have time to ligate together both OtsA and OtsB and were therefore unable to do any functional assays. | ||
- | + | <br> | |
+ | <br> | ||
<html><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/M2/FreezeDrying"><img style="vertical-align:bottom;" width=50px align="left" src="http://i691.photobucket.com/albums/vv271/dk806/II09_Learnmore.png"></a></html> <b><i>About freeze drying & trehalose biosynthesis.</i></b> | <html><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/M2/FreezeDrying"><img style="vertical-align:bottom;" width=50px align="left" src="http://i691.photobucket.com/albums/vv271/dk806/II09_Learnmore.png"></a></html> <b><i>About freeze drying & trehalose biosynthesis.</i></b> | ||
<html><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results#Module_2"><img style="vertical-align:bottom;" width=50px align="left" src="http://i691.photobucket.com/albums/vv271/dk806/II09_Learnmore.png"></a></html> <b><i>About our wetlab results</i></b> | <html><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results#Module_2"><img style="vertical-align:bottom;" width=50px align="left" src="http://i691.photobucket.com/albums/vv271/dk806/II09_Learnmore.png"></a></html> <b><i>About our wetlab results</i></b> | ||
- | + | <br> | |
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<u>Drylab</u> | <u>Drylab</u> | ||
+ | |||
+ | //no simulations for encapsulation! | ||
{{Imperial/09/Division}} | {{Imperial/09/Division}} |
Revision as of 12:51, 18 October 2009
Contents |
Module 2 - Encapsulsation
The E.ncapsulatior has been designed to be able to withstand the rigours of stomach acid and freeze drying. This is achieved by the synthesis of the exopolysaccharide colanic acid and the cryoprotectant trehalose. They will form a protective coat around The E.ncapsulatior, and this coat will protect the proteins of interest from degradation due to the harsh environments.
Genetic Circuit
Module 2 is triggered by a rise in levels of cyclic Adenosine Mono Phosphate (cAMP). This is because cAMP facilitates the dimerisation of the transcription factor CRP which induces transcription downstream of the PcstA promoter. The rise in cAMP is correlated with a fall in levels of the primary carbon source (glucose). Thus, by controlling the initial amount of glucose present in the system, we achieve a timer function for the start of Module 2. Colanic acid and trehalose will be produced as a result. We can now say encapsulation has begun.
Our results
Wetlab
- Acid resistance
To characterise colanic acid encapsulation, we assembled the following testing constructs:
About induced acid resistance.
- Freeze Drying
To characterise the protective effect of trehalose against freeze drying, we assembled the following testing constructs:
Unfortunately, we did not have time to ligate together both OtsA and OtsB and were therefore unable to do any functional assays.
About freeze drying & trehalose biosynthesis.
About our wetlab results
Drylab
//no simulations for encapsulation!
Initiation:
Module 2 is triggered by a rise in levels of cyclic Adenosine Mono Phosphate (cAMP). This is because cAMP facilitates the dimerisation of the transcription factor CRP which induces transcription downstream of the PcstA promoter. The rise in cAMP is correlated with a fall in levels of the primary carbon source (glucose). Thus, by controlling the initial amount of glucose present in the system, we achieve a timer function for the start of Module 2.
Acid Resistance Theory:
By 'hacking' E.coli’s endogenous acid resistance pathways in three places we induced the formation of a safe colanic acid microcapsule that protects against the harsh acidic conditions of the stomach. Without encapsulation, our polypeptides would be denatured and degraded by stomach acid and digestive proteases respectively.
About induced acid resistance.
The Encapsulation Triple Hack:
Acid Resistance Results:
To characterise colanic acid encapsulation, we assembled the following testing constructs:
Freeze Drying Theory:
Freeze drying is the process by which a material is preserved via its dehydration at a very low temperature. Freeze drying our chassis would slow the decomposition of the polypeptide of interest and prevent the growth of any contaminants. Unfortunatly, freeze drying can seriously damage cell membranes and denature the internal polypeptides. To prevent this from occuring we have decided to upregulate the biosynthesis of the cryoprotectant trehalose. The genes OtsA and OtsB are required for trehalose production.
About freeze drying & trehalose biosynthesis.
Freeze Drying Results:
To characterise the protective effect of trehalose against freeze drying, we assembled the following testing constructs:
Unfortunatly, we did not have time to ligate together both OtsA and OtsB and were therefore unable to do any functional assays.
Finale:
The end of Module 2 occurs when the temperature of the culture is raised to 42 degrees centigrade. This temperature shift triggers the initiation of Module 3 in which the genome is deleted.
Project Tour
Module 2 Contents