Team:Paris/Ethics ethicalreport
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
m (→The Paris team ethical and sociological report) |
(→The Paris team ethical and sociological report) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here. | The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Preface : Why wonder about ethics in a biological engineering competition? | ||
+ | * Methods | ||
+ | * Introduction | ||
+ | ** A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative. | ||
+ | ** B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world. | ||
+ | * I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns | ||
+ | ** A. Biosafety | ||
+ | ** B. Biosecurity | ||
+ | * II. Naturality and Artificiality. | ||
+ | ** A. From “what” do we have to protect nature? | ||
+ | ** B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue? | ||
+ | ** C. A false question? ... | ||
+ | ** D. … An ironical answer | ||
+ | ** E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living. | ||
+ | ** F. Conclusion | ||
+ | * III. Practices | ||
+ | ** A. What form for what life science? | ||
+ | 1. Standardization | ||
+ | ** B. Self or Exploded governance? | ||
+ | ** C. Forms of critics | ||
+ | ** D. To finish with... A case study | ||
+ | * Conclusion | ||
+ | * Acknowledgements | ||
+ | * References | ||
+ | * Appendices : Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion. | ||
+ | |||
*[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportFullIntroduction| Full Introduction]] | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportFullIntroduction| Full Introduction]] |
Revision as of 19:21, 19 October 2009
iGEM > Paris > Ethic > Ethical Report > Main
The Paris team ethical and sociological report
The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here.
- Preface : Why wonder about ethics in a biological engineering competition?
- Methods
- Introduction
- A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
- B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world.
- I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns
- A. Biosafety
- B. Biosecurity
- II. Naturality and Artificiality.
- A. From “what” do we have to protect nature?
- B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue?
- C. A false question? ...
- D. … An ironical answer
- E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living.
- F. Conclusion
- III. Practices
- A. What form for what life science?
1. Standardization
- B. Self or Exploded governance?
- C. Forms of critics
- D. To finish with... A case study
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendices : Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.
- Preface : Why wonder about ethics in a biological engineering competition?
- Methods : How was this report made?
- Introduction : what are our goals?