Team:Chiba/Team

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 38: Line 38:
'''4,''' [[Team:Chiba/Project#Conclusions|Conclusions]]
'''4,''' [[Team:Chiba/Project#Conclusions|Conclusions]]
</td></tr></table>
</td></tr></table>
-
 
-
 
|style="width:85%;" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"|
|style="width:85%;" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"|
-
 
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
== '''Who we are''' ==
== '''Who we are''' ==

Revision as of 18:53, 20 October 2009

E.coli Time Manager -Since 2008-


Home The Team Parts Reference Notebook Protocols Links Acknowledgements Contact

The Project

1, Introduction

2, Project Design

3, Experiments, Results & Discussion

3-1, Making LuxR Mutants

3-2, Characterization

3-3, For improving pictures

3-4, Demonstration

4, Conclusions

Who we are

Yoshimi Iyama

Kaoru Yamamoto

Makoto Nozawa

Prof. Daisuke Umeno

Prof. Taro Toyota

Prof. Kyoichi Saito

Players:

Advisers:

  • Yohei Tashiro (D1)
  • Akinori Katabami(M2)
  • Kei Terakubo(M2)
  • Maiko Furubayashi (M1)
  • Hiroki Fukutomi (B4)
  • Masahiro Tominaga (B4)
  • [http://chem.tf.chiba-u.jp/acb03/umeno/aboutus.html The member] of [http://chem.tf.chiba-u.jp/acb03/umeno/index.html UmeG]

Faculty Advisers:

  • [http://chem.tf.chiba-u.jp/gacb02/index.html Prof. Daisuke Umeno]
  • [http://chem.tf.chiba-u.jp/~toyotaro/ Prof. Taro Toyota]
  • [http://chem.tf.chiba-u.jp/gacb02/index.html Prof. Kyouichi Saitou]

What we did

(Provide proper attribution for all work)


Where we're from

[http://www.eng.chiba-u.ac.jp/e-index.html The Department of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology] [http://www.chiba-u.ac.jp/e/ at Chiba University],Japan.

Collaborations

iGEM JAPAN 2009

We practiced presentation and exchanged ideas with these team.


TAIWAN TEAM

We exchanged ideas with these team. I want to express my heartfelt thanks.

Ethics

Thank you Valencia!

Safety

For iGEM 2009 teams are asked to detail how they approached any issues of biological safety associated with their projects.

Specifically, teams should consider the following four questions:

  1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
    • researcher safety,
    • public safety, or
    • environmental safety?
  2. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
  3. What does your local biosafety group think about your project?
  4. Do any of the new BioBrick parts that you made this year raise any safety issues?
    • If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry?

Teams, please document any answers to these (or other) safety questions in your presentation, wiki presentation, or poster.

Judges will be asked to evaluate your project, in part, on the basis of if and how you considered and addressed issues of biological safety.

If any questions arise regarding iGEM and biological safety please send an email to safety AT igem.org.
We participated in these team's survey.


Retrieved from "http://2009.igem.org/Team:Chiba/Team"