** Anneal at Tm + 3°C. The Tm should be calculated with the nearest-neighbor method.
** Anneal at Tm + 3°C. The Tm should be calculated with the nearest-neighbor method.
***The extension time is usually calculated according to the shortest piece with 15 sec /kb if the cloning is not complicated. For example, if there is only one insert and is shorter than the vector, say, 600 bp, then I will use 15 sec for extension. Refer to the published paper for detailed information.
***The extension time is usually calculated according to the shortest piece with 15 sec /kb if the cloning is not complicated. For example, if there is only one insert and is shorter than the vector, say, 600 bp, then I will use 15 sec for extension. Refer to the published paper for detailed information.
-
-
-
[[#Protocols | Back to top]]<br>
==DNA Purification==
==DNA Purification==
-
[[#Protocols | Back to top]]<br>
+
[[#Protocols | Back to top]]<br />
-
<br>
+
-
+
DNA purification
DNA purification
Materials : <html> <ul>
Materials : <html> <ul>
Line 377:
Line 372:
Protocol:
Protocol:
-
1. Perform agarose gel electrophoresis to fractionate DNA fragments. Any type or grade of agarose may be used. It is strongly recommended, however, that fresh TAE buffer or TBE buffer be used as running buffer. Do not re-use running buffer as its pH will increase and reduce yields.
+
# Perform agarose gel electrophoresis to fractionate DNA fragments. Any type or grade of agarose may be used. It is strongly recommended, however, that fresh TAE buffer or TBE buffer be used as running buffer. Do not re-use running buffer as its pH will increase and reduce yields.
-
2. When adequate separation of bands has occurred, carefully excise the DNA fragment of interest using a wide, clean scalpel.
+
# When adequate separation of bands has occurred, carefully excise the DNA fragment of interest using a wide, clean scalpel.
-
3. Determine the approximate volume of the gel slice by weighing it in a clean 1.5 ml microfuge tube. Assuming a density of 1 g/ml of gel, the volume of gel is derived as follows: A gel slice of mass 0.3 g will have a volume of 0.3 ml. Add equal volume of Binding Buffer (XP2). Incubate the mixture at 55C-60C for 7 min or until the gel has completely melted. Mix by shaking or inverting the tube every 2-3 minutes. Centrifuge the tube briefly to collect all the liquid to the bottom of the tube.
+
# Determine the approximate volume of the gel slice by weighing it in a clean 1.5 ml microfuge tube. Assuming a density of 1 g/ml of gel, the volume of gel is derived as follows: A gel slice of mass 0.3 g will have a volume of 0.3 ml. Add equal volume of Binding Buffer (XP2). Incubate the mixture at 55C-60C for 7 min or until the gel has completely melted. Mix by shaking or inverting the tube every 2-3 minutes. Centrifuge the tube briefly to collect all the liquid to the bottom of the tube.
Note: For DNA fragment less than 500bp, add 1 sample volume of isopropanol after the addition of Binding Buffer (XP2).
Note: For DNA fragment less than 500bp, add 1 sample volume of isopropanol after the addition of Binding Buffer (XP2).
-
4. Apply up to 700 ul of the DNA/agarose solution to a HiBind® DNA spin column assembled in a clean 2 ml collection tube (provided) and centrifuge in a microcentrifuge at 8,000-10,000 x g for 1 min at room temperature. Discard the liquid. Re-use the collection tube in Steps 5-8. For volumes greater than 700 ul, load the column and centrifuge successively, 700 ul at a time. Each HiBind® spin-column has a total capacity of 25-30 ug DNA.
+
# Apply up to 700 ul of the DNA/agarose solution to a HiBind® DNA spin column assembled in a clean 2 ml collection tube (provided) and centrifuge in a microcentrifuge at 8,000-10,000 x g for 1 min at room temperature. Discard the liquid. Re-use the collection tube in Steps 5-8. For volumes greater than 700 ul, load the column and centrifuge successively, 700 ul at a time. Each HiBind® spin-column has a total capacity of 25-30 ug DNA.
-
5. Discard liquid and add 300ul Binding Buffer. Centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 minutes.
+
# Discard liquid and add 300ul Binding Buffer. Centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 minutes.
-
6. Add 700 ul of SPW Buffer diluted with absolute ethanol into the column and wait 2-3 minutes. Centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 min at room temperature to wash the sample.
+
# Add 700 ul of SPW Buffer diluted with absolute ethanol into the column and wait 2-3 minutes. Centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 min at room temperature to wash the sample.
-
7. Discard liquid and repeat step 6 with another 700 ul SPW Buffer.
+
# Discard liquid and repeat step 6 with another 700 ul SPW Buffer.
-
8. Discard liquid and, re-using the collection tube, centrifuge the empty column for 1 min at maxi speed (>13,000 x g) to dry the column matrix. This drying step is critical for good DNA yields.
+
# Discard liquid and, re-using the collection tube, centrifuge the empty column for 1 min at maxi speed (>13,000 x g) to dry the column matrix. This drying step is critical for good DNA yields.
-
9. Place column into a clean 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube (not provided). Add 30-50 ul depending on desired concentration of final product) Elution Buffer (or sterile deionized water) directly to the center of the column matrix, then incubate for 1 minute. Centrifuge 1 min at maxi speed (>13,000 x g) to elute DNA. This represents approximately 70% of bound DNA. An optional second elution will yield any residual DNA, though at a lo
+
# Place column into a clean 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube (not provided). Add 30-50 ul depending on desired concentration of final product) Elution Buffer (or sterile deionized water) directly to the center of the column matrix, then incubate for 1 minute. Centrifuge 1 min at maxi speed (>13,000 x g) to elute DNA. This represents approximately 70% of bound DNA. An optional second elution will yield any residual DNA, though at a lo
CPEC applied to BioBricks™ & Biodegradable Plastic Synthesis Pathway in E. coli
We, the determined and motivated Duke University iGEM 2009 team of 6 undergraduate students, 2 graduate students, and 2 professors, have developed a practical, powerful, biotechnological method to deliver on the promise of sustainable green synthetic biology!
Our biotechnological method enables the creation of gene-sized DNA. Due to the high costs and inefficiency of the process of cloning a gene, we invented a new procedure which lowers costs and increases efficiency. This method, Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC), saves time as well, since this method does not involve ligation or restriction enzymes. Our method has been published in a peer-reviewed journal here here
We have applied our method to the production of biologically derived plastics. The rising costs of the current method of producing biodegradable plastics in an environmentally sound manner has hindered its widespread use. However, we have discovered a more efficient pathway to produce these biodegradable plastics.
What is CPEC?
Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC) is the development of a much simplified
sequence-independent cloning technology based entirely on the polymerase extension
mechanism. This method extends overlapping regions between the insert and vector
fragments to form a complete circular plasmid. An extremely simple theory, CPEC
piggybacks PCR in splicing genes. The gene insert is modified to have ends that
overlap with the ends of the linearized vector and both have similar melting temperatures.
The insert and vector are placed within a PCR machine in the absence of primers.
Denaturation separates the double-stranded insert and vector and the overlapping
ends anneal. Polymerase extension mechanism is then used to complete the plasmid. Using this method, we are able to quickly assemble a metabolic pathway consisting of multiple enzymes and regulatory elements for the production of a biocompatible as well as biodegradable plastic polymer in E. coli.
Figure 1a. Biobrick spliced into vector using CPEC
Figure 1b. Multicomponent Biobrick system spliced into vector simulatenously using CPEC
Gel electrophoresis analysis of the final assembly of a multicomponent system after a 20-cycle CPEC
What are benefits?
The process of high-throughput cloning is bottle necked
at the restriction and ligation stages. A combination of high costs, requirements
for restriction site specific enzymes and general inefficiency of the process
makes cloning on a large combinatorial gene library inviable. Circular Polymerase
Extension Cloning (CPEC) addresses this issue by eliminating the need for restriction
and ligation enzymes and thereby streamlining and condensing the procedure into
the duration of 5 minutes.
Advantages/Disadvantages of BioBricks
BioBrick parts can be incorporated in E. coli , due to its common
interphase.
BioBrick parts are not easily made due to its site-specific cutting of the plasmid.
Standardized CPEC
We will apply CPEC in the construction of a multi-component
plasmid containing biobricks. Previous Duke iGEM projects have yielded the genes
in a metabolic pathway that synthesizes poly(3HB-co-4HB), a biodegradable plastic,
in E. coli. We will transform those genes into biobricks, with sticky ends,
and efficiently combine them in a vector using CPEC.
Biodegradable
Plastic Synthesis Pathway in E. coli
Polyhydroxyalkanoic acids (PHA),
naturally occurring storage polymers found in a variety of bacteria, have received
increased attention for their potential use as bioplastics that are both biodegradable
and reduce reliance on petroleum-based plastics. In particular, the copolymer
poly(3-hyroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate), or poly(3HB-co-4HB), which combines
the 3HB and 4HB polymers from different bacteria (Figure 2 shows the pathway), has elastic properties ideal
for a wide range of thermoplastic applications. The high cost of PHA, however,
is the biggest impediment to widespread use of bioplastics. Moreover, poly(3HB-co-4HB)
pathways developed so far in E. coli have yielded undesirably low and unpredictable
4HB-to-3HB ratios.
Figure 2. Pathway for poly(3HB-co-4HB) synthesis [citation]
Thus, this project aims to develop a more efficient
biopathway for poly(3HB-co-4HB) while increasing the 4HB monomer composition predictably.
It was hypothesized that optimizing codon permutations of the phaC gene would
greatly increase affinity of PHA synthase to the 4HB monomer. To date, the phaCAB
and cat2 operons have been cloned into pUC19 and PCR Blunt II-TOPO vectors for
successful independent production of the 3HB and 4HB polymers (Figure 4). Ligation and transformation
into E. coli as six different recombinant constructs will soon be completed
and allow for engineering of the poly(3HB-co4HB) biopathway. Future directions
would be to test the hypothesis to see if phaC can be manipulated to increase
4HB-to-3HB composition in poly(3HB-co-4HB) and to increase efficient production
of the bioplastic by engineering the FtsZ cell division protein to allow for cells
to accumulate larger quantities of PHA granules before dividing. Ultimately, once
an optimal biopathway is found, the goal would be to explore a model for mass
production of PHA bioplastics so that novel applications of bioplastics can be
feasible economically.
Figure 3. Plasmid vector and genes used for transformation in E. coli
Figure 4. The reddish tint present on some colonies indicates the presence of PHA granules in the bacteria
Protocol:
5x Phusion HF Buffer 4 ul
10 mM dNTPs 0.4 ul
Vector 50 ng/1kb
Insert x ng*
Phusion DNA Polymerase 0.2 ul
H2O to 20 ul
The amount of insert is determined so that the molar ratio for vector and insert is 1 to 2.
98°C 30sec
10X
98°C 10 sec
Annealing** 30 sec
72°C x sec***
72°C 5min
4°C hold
Anneal at Tm + 3°C. The Tm should be calculated with the nearest-neighbor method.
The extension time is usually calculated according to the shortest piece with 15 sec /kb if the cloning is not complicated. For example, if there is only one insert and is shorter than the vector, say, 600 bp, then I will use 15 sec for extension. Refer to the published paper for detailed information.
E.Z.N.A Gel Purification Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Cat No. D2500-02 )
Water bath equilibrated to 55-65C
Microcentrifuge capable of at least 10,000 x g
Nuclease-free 1.5 ml centrifuge bottles
Absolute (95%-100%) ethanol
Protective eye-wear
Isopropanol (for fragments < 500 bp only)
Protocol:
Perform agarose gel electrophoresis to fractionate DNA fragments. Any type or grade of agarose may be used. It is strongly recommended, however, that fresh TAE buffer or TBE buffer be used as running buffer. Do not re-use running buffer as its pH will increase and reduce yields.
When adequate separation of bands has occurred, carefully excise the DNA fragment of interest using a wide, clean scalpel.
Determine the approximate volume of the gel slice by weighing it in a clean 1.5 ml microfuge tube. Assuming a density of 1 g/ml of gel, the volume of gel is derived as follows: A gel slice of mass 0.3 g will have a volume of 0.3 ml. Add equal volume of Binding Buffer (XP2). Incubate the mixture at 55C-60C for 7 min or until the gel has completely melted. Mix by shaking or inverting the tube every 2-3 minutes. Centrifuge the tube briefly to collect all the liquid to the bottom of the tube.
Note: For DNA fragment less than 500bp, add 1 sample volume of isopropanol after the addition of Binding Buffer (XP2).
Apply up to 700 ul of the DNA/agarose solution to a HiBind® DNA spin column assembled in a clean 2 ml collection tube (provided) and centrifuge in a microcentrifuge at 8,000-10,000 x g for 1 min at room temperature. Discard the liquid. Re-use the collection tube in Steps 5-8. For volumes greater than 700 ul, load the column and centrifuge successively, 700 ul at a time. Each HiBind® spin-column has a total capacity of 25-30 ug DNA.
Discard liquid and add 300ul Binding Buffer. Centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 minutes.
Add 700 ul of SPW Buffer diluted with absolute ethanol into the column and wait 2-3 minutes. Centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 min at room temperature to wash the sample.
Discard liquid and repeat step 6 with another 700 ul SPW Buffer.
Discard liquid and, re-using the collection tube, centrifuge the empty column for 1 min at maxi speed (>13,000 x g) to dry the column matrix. This drying step is critical for good DNA yields.
Place column into a clean 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube (not provided). Add 30-50 ul depending on desired concentration of final product) Elution Buffer (or sterile deionized water) directly to the center of the column matrix, then incubate for 1 minute. Centrifuge 1 min at maxi speed (>13,000 x g) to elute DNA. This represents approximately 70% of bound DNA. An optional second elution will yield any residual DNA, though at a lo
Protocols:
5x Phusion HF Buffer 10 ul
10 mM dNTPs 1 ul
DNA template 1 pg – 10 ng
Forward primer (10 uM) 2.5 ul
Reverse primer (10 uM) 2.5 ul
Phusion DNA Polymerase 0.5 ul
H2O to 50 ul
Anneal at Tm + 3°C. The Tm should be calculated with the nearest-neighbor method.
Single Colony PCR
Back to top
Materials:
• Taq DNA Polymerase with Standard Taq Buffer (NEB, Cat. No. M0273)
• 10 mM dNTP Mix (NEB, Cat. No. N0447)
• Thermocycler
Protocols:
10x Standard Taq Buffer 2 ul
10 mM dNTPs 0.4 ul
Bacteria culture* 1 ul
Forward primer (10 uM) 1 ul
Reverse primer (10 uM) 1 ul
Taq DNA Polymerase 0.2 ul
H2O to 20 ul
Bacteria culture refers to E. coli cultured in LB solution overnight.
94°C 5 min
25X
94°C 15 sec
Annealing ** 30 sec
72°C 1 min /1 kb
72°C 5min
4°C hold
Anneal at Tm which is calculated with salt-adjusted method.
Andrew Ang andrew.ang(at)duke.edu Andrew Ang is a freshman at Duke, majoring in Biomedical Engineering. Apart from class and iGEM, he is involved in the Jazz Ensembles program and Asian Students Association at Duke. His hobbies include piano, saxophone, tennis, and squash. He is interested in molecular and synthetic biology, biomolecular engineering and medical research. He has previously worked as part of the MIT 2008 team, and he is excited to participate in iGEM again this year, and many more years to come.
Kevin Chien kevin.chien(at)duke.edu
Yaoyao Fu yf21(at)duke.edu
Faith Kung fk8(at)duke.edu
Faith Kung is a senior at Duke majoring in Biomedical Engineering with minors in Music and Biology. She enjoys working in a lab. Besides academics, her hobbies
include arts and crafts, dance, and figure skating. Also, she is actively involved in the IV Christian Fellowship. Faith is applying to PhD programs
in Biomedical Science and hopes to pursue a career in scientific research and
education. She is excited about attending the iGEM competition this year.
Sahil Prasada sahil.prasada(at)duke.edu
Sahil Prasada is a freshman at Duke. He plans to pursue medicine as a career. His interests lie in Detroit sports, tennis, and dancing. He is a member of the DBS Raas team on campus. He is currently in the Trinity School of the Arts and Sciences but is considering transferring to the Pratt School of Engineering. He hopes that the Detroit Lions may one day win the Superbowl. While waiting for this to occur, he will attend the iGEM competition and is looking forward to winning an award.
Nicholas Tang nicholas.tang(at)duke.edu
Peter Zhu peter.zhu(at)duke.edu Peter Zhu Is a freshman at Duke University and a North Carolina local. Though he's not sure yet what to do with his life, he thinks Biomedical Engineering and pre-Law is looking pretty good. When he's not busy with the routines of life, he is listening to the Billboard Top 100, playing Chopin Preludes, searching for new places to eat, playing tennis, studying poker, and gaming Starcraft/DoTA. Peter is a regular at Bail Hai Mongolian Grill, Lime and Basil Vietnamese Pho, and Five Guy's Burgers---bacon cheeseburger with all toppings of course.
"
