"
Minnesota/16 June 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {|style="align:left" width="965" |- |''' Back to Notebook Home''' |- |'''Go to Previous Day (June 15)'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/...) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|'''[[Minnesota/15 June 2009|Go to Previous Day (June 15)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/17 June 2009|Go to Next Day (June 17)]]''' | |'''[[Minnesota/15 June 2009|Go to Previous Day (June 15)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/17 June 2009|Go to Next Day (June 17)]]''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | '''Patrick'''<br> | ||
| + | Today I submitted and analyzed three more models to investigate how different kinetic factors changed the model. One model looked to see how increasing the kinetic constant of TetR2 production (reaction 44) by and order of magnitude would affect the model. The second looked at how decreasing the same constant by an order of magnitude changed the graph. Below are these two models along with the base model for comparison: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <center> | ||
| + | <gallery widths=250 heights=150> | ||
| + | Image:NCbase.jpg|Figure 1 - Base Model For Comparison | ||
Revision as of 20:08, 29 July 2009
| Back to Notebook Home | |
| Go to Previous Day (June 15) | Go to Next Day (June 17) |
Patrick
Today I submitted and analyzed three more models to investigate how different kinetic factors changed the model. One model looked to see how increasing the kinetic constant of TetR2 production (reaction 44) by and order of magnitude would affect the model. The second looked at how decreasing the same constant by an order of magnitude changed the graph. Below are these two models along with the base model for comparison:
 Figure 1 - Base Model For Comparison |
