Team:KULeuven/Notebook/Vanillin Production
From 2009.igem.org
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html><div id="HideRedLinks"></html> | ||
= Week 1: 6 July 2009 - 12 July 2009 = | = Week 1: 6 July 2009 - 12 July 2009 = | ||
Line 195: | Line 197: | ||
{{Team:KULeuven/EditableTemplateH3|Sunday|Team:KULeuven/8_November_2009/VanillinProduction}} | {{Team:KULeuven/EditableTemplateH3|Sunday|Team:KULeuven/8_November_2009/VanillinProduction}} | ||
--> | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html></div></html> |
Revision as of 06:56, 9 August 2009
Contents |
Week 1: 6 July 2009 - 12 July 2009
Week 2: 13 July 2009 - 19 July 2009
[edit] Monday
- Vanillin synthesis: DNA not yet complete/in library [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_I742140]
- Combination of 5 genes; 3 are available
- Edinburgh Vanilla production (Pathway synthesis, Edinburgh iGEM 2007)
- [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=17437627#id538997 Vanillin production using metabolically engineered Escherichia coli under non-growing conditions], Ferulic accid --> Vanillin, 5k bp
- Combination of 5 genes; 3 are available
[edit] Tuesday
- Biobricks for vanillin synthesis
- Send mail to University of Tuscia [Done]
- Order:
- (sam8 (tyrosine-ammonia lyase) coding sequence) [ordered]
- (sam5 (coumarate hydroxylase) coding sequence) [ordered]
- (COMT gene with ribosome binding site) [Available in kit]
Extra info on vanillin synthesis
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16232583 1 B C Okeke and V Venturi ,Construction of recombinants Pseudomonas putida BO14 and Escherichia coli QEFCA8 for ferulic acid biotransformation to vanillin, J Biosci Bioeng. 1999; 88(1): 103–106.
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14602615 2 Jörg Overhage, Alexander Steinbüchel, and Horst Priefert,Highly Efficient Biotransformation of Eugenol to Ferulic Acid and Further Conversion to Vanillin in Recombinant Strains of Escherichia coli, Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 November; 69(11): 6569–6576. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6569-6576.2003.
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10616715 3 J Overhage, H Priefert, J Rabenhorst, and A Steinbüchel,Biotransformation of eugenol to vanillin by a mutant of Pseudomonas sp. strain HR199 constructed by disruption of the vanillin dehydrogenase (vdh) gene, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999 November; 52(6): 820–828.
- http://www.labmeeting.com/paper/2776259/yoon-enhanced-vanillin-production-from-recombinant-e-coli-using-ntg-mutagenesis-and-adsorbent-resin 4 Yoon SH, Lee EG, Das A, Lee SH, Li C, Ryu HK, Choi MS, Seo WT, and Kim SW, Enhanced vanillin production from recombinant E. coli using NTG mutagenesis and adsorbent resin, Biotechnology progress 23(5):1143.
- http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1517-83822003000500037&script=sci_arttext 5 Attilio ConvertiI; Danilo de FaveriI; Patrizia PeregoI; Paolo BarghiniII; Maurizio RuzziII; Luciane SeneIII, Vanillin production by recombinant strains of Escherichia coli, Braz. J. Microbiol. vol.34 suppl.1 São Paulo Nov. 2003
- http://www.springerlink.com/content/bj47xnqn5kr65wvp/fulltext.pdf 6 S. Achterholt, H. Priefert, and A. Steinbüchel, Identification of Amycolatopsis sp. strain HR167 genes, involved in the bioconversion of ferulic acid to vanillin, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000 December; 54(6): 799–807
[edit] Thursday
- Focus on the last two parts in the synthesis of vanillin since that pathway has been proven
- Can always add additional 3 paths
- Send mail to U. Edinburgh for the proteins for vanillin synthesis [Done]
- Received mail back from Edinburgh, biobricking of the parts should still be done. Will receive answer next week
Week 3: 20 July 2009 - 26 July 2009
[edit] Friday
- sam5; no part number, Pst1 site removed
- sam8; coding sequence without RBS
- COMT; coding sequence without RBS
- ech; RBS + ech, in ,
- fcs; RBS + fcs, in ,
Week 4: 27 July 2009 - 2 August 2009
[edit] Monday
- Modeling:
- Searching for reaction kinetics parameters: degradation of enzymes.
[edit] Tuesday
[edit] Wednesday
- RBS + ech, in ,
- RBS + fcs, in ,
They were put in the freezer and will be incorporated into competent cells, so they can be multiplied and stored.
[edit] Thursday
- RBS + ech, in ,
- RBS + fcs, in ,
The cells were then transferred to liquid LBmedium to recuperate from the procedure. After a few hours they were transferred to LB/amp plates and grown overnight at 37°C.
[edit] Friday
Week 5: 3 August 2009 - 9 August 2009
[edit] Monday
- sam5 + RBS in (with PstI site removed),
- sam8 + RBS in ,
- sam8 in coding sequence,
- COMT in coding sequence,
The cells were put into liquid LB to recuperate from the procedure, transferred onto LB/amp plates and grown overnight at 37°C.
We also made liquid cultures of the RBS + fcs and RBS + ech cultures so we can miniprep them tomorrow.
[edit] Tuesday
Plasmid DNA from the ech and fcs liquid cultures was isolated today. It yielded respectively 108,8 and 113,9 ng/µl.
[edit] Wednesday
- RBS + sam5 conc: 101,3 ng/ul
- RBS + sam8 conc: 95.7 ng/ul
- sam8 conc: 81,8 ng/ul
- COMT , conc: 122,9 ng/ul
Restriction digestion
A1: sam8, EcoRI en SpeI
A2: sam5, EcoRI en XbaI
B1: RBS, EcoRI en SpeI
B2: COMT, EcoRI en XbaI
C1: fcs, EcoRI en SpeI
C2: ech, EcoRI en XbaI
The mixture was incubated in 37°C for 1h30...
...followed by gel electrophoresis of the digested parts
[edit] Thursday
A1, sam5: 11,6 ng/ul
A2, sam8: 5,5 ng/ul
B2, COMT: 24,3 ng/ul
C1, fcs: 16,6 ng/ul
C2, ech: 16,9 ng/ul
A1 and A2 showed a very low concentration and the 260/280 value was quite high so both were electrophoresed again.
B1 (RBS) had failed because it was too short, however ligating B1 and B2 (COMT) was no longer needed since the part with RBS was available in the iGEM 2009 kit .
A1 and A2 were redigested:
A1: sam8, EcoRI en SpeI
A2: sam5, EcoRI en XbaI
followed by gel electrophoresis
[edit] Friday
Part | concentration (ng/μl) | 260/280 λ | 260/230 λ |
---|---|---|---|
A1 (sam5) | 3,4 | 1,80 | 0,01 |
A2 (sam8) | 3,1 | 2,66 | 0,02 |
- COMT was grown
- sam5 and sam8 were ligated
- ech and fcs were ligated
Week 6: 10 August 2009 - 16 August 2009
[edit] Monday
- Ligated genes are electrophoresed.
- Reorderd part (COMT + RBS) from the registry.
- Also we realized the proteins need to be degraded fast for the control mechanism to work, so a ssRA degradation tag like ANDENYALVA or ANDENYALAA is needed.
- However since some genes have just been ligated we will only tag sam5, COMT and the ech gene.
[edit] Tuesday
- There was no growth of sam8/sam5, fcs/ech and COMT plates.
- Possible reason is a problem with the electrocompetent cells
- Or the concentration of sam5/sam8 is too low
- Plan for tomorrow is to create new electrocompetent cells
- Prepared LB and glycerol today
- Made liquid cultures sam8, sam5, fcs and ech
- Made new agarplates with Ampicilin
[edit] Wednesday
- Miniprep on sam5, sam8 and fcs
- There was no growth on ech, thus new cultures in liquid medium
- Restriction digest on sam5, sam8 and fcs
- Gel electrophoresis on sam5, sam8 and fcs
- Gel extraction on sam5 and fcs
Nanodrop results:
Part | concentration (ng/μl) | 260/280 λ | 260/230 λ |
---|---|---|---|
fcs | 4,2 | 6,08 | |
sam5 | 7,3 | 2,76 |
Notes:
- sam8 showed a very low concentration on the gel electrophoresis. Thus, it is better to redo this test.
- 260/280 for fcs was very high and the concentration was not high enough. Therefore, we will redo the extraction and use multiple tubes on the same filter to increase the concentration
[edit] Thursday
- Plated COMT (+RBS) from the registry
- Growing overnight in 37°C
- Plated ech
- From newly made liquid culture
- Miniprep of ech and sam8
- Nanodrop results:
Part | concentration (ng/μl) | 260/280 λ | 260/230 λ |
---|---|---|---|
ech | 72,7 | 1,94 | |
sam8 | 66,2 | 2,00 |
- Restriction digest on ech and sam8
- Gel electrophoresis on ech and sam8
- New electrocompetent cells were used for the electroporation with the old ligations
- Lig A -> sam5 + sam8
- Lig C -> ech + fcs
- Note: there was no spark
- Plating of the electroporated cells
- 200 μl per plate twice
- 600 μl left of A and C
[edit] Friday
- Gel extraction of the 4 lanes from sam8 () and ech ()
- To test an additional blanc, we extracted a blanc piece of gel
- Nanodrop results were done with the conventional blanc (just elution buffer) and with the extracted blanco gel. However, since the results between both varied too much and the extracted blanco gel was not significantly better, we decided to use the conventional blanco in order to compare between former nanodrop measurements
Nanodrop:
Part | concentration (ng/μl) | 260/280 λ | 260/230 λ |
---|---|---|---|
sam8 | 9,4 | 2,18 | |
ech | 13,6 | 1,94 |
- Ligation of sam5 (from Wednesday) + sam8 (extracted today)
vector | insert |
---|---|
sam5 | sam8 |
3637 bp | 1550 bp |
50 ng | 85,2 ng |
7 μl | 9 μl |
- Ligation of ech and fcs. For fcs we took the digest from last week (C1), because this week's restriction digest had a very low concentration (4,2) and a very high 260/280 (6,08)
vector | insert |
---|---|
ech | fcs |
2929 bp | 1789 bp |
50 ng | 122 ng |
3 μl | 9 μl |
- Cells were stored at 16°C
- Plated the electroporated cells from the A and C ligation
- Made Agar and poured new plates with Ap