Template:Team:KULeuven/12 August 2009/VanillinReceptor

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 08:56, 8 September 2009

B,G and R were stored for further procedure. A failed again: there was no visible growth. This second time there was no problem with the competent cells because we used a commercial product instead of a self made. We assumed there was a problem with adding the polyA tails to the PCR product because, when redoing the gelelectroforesis, there were no errors with the PCR product.
We did a new PCR on the bacteria with the inserted plasmids for B,G and R to check if the gene was inserted correctly.
PCR was performed for W,X,Y and Z to isolate the genes.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-* B,G and R were stored for further procedure. A failed again because there was no growth visible. This second time there was no problem with the competent cells because we used a commercial product and not self made. We assumed there was a problem with adding the polyA tales to the PCR product because we did a new gelelectroforesis and there were no errors with the PCR product.
+* B,G and R were stored for further procedure. A failed again: there was no visible growth. This second time there was no problem with the competent cells because we used a commercial product instead of a self made. We assumed there was a problem with adding the polyA tails to the PCR product because, when redoing the gelelectroforesis, there were no errors with the PCR product.
-*We did a new PCR on the bacteria with the inserted plasmids for B,G and R to check if the gene certainly was inserted correct.
+*We did a new PCR on the bacteria with the inserted plasmids for B,G and R to check if the gene was inserted correctly.
 *PCR was performed for W,X,Y and Z to isolate the genes.