Team:Johns Hopkins-BAG/A New Standard
From 2009.igem.org
(→Someething) |
(→Someething) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Template:JHU_BAG_SideBar}} | {{Template:JHU_BAG_SideBar}} | ||
==Someething== | ==Someething== | ||
- | + | ||
+ | The physical assembly of standard parts is currently a non-standard process, which can either come from direct genome PCR with restriction enzyme sites incorporated into the PCR primers, or overlap assembly PCR. Furthermore, current Biobrick construction standards [RFC 10,11,12 etc.] rely heavily on restriction enzyme based methods, which can be sequence, cost and time restrictive. This is especially true of large DNA assembly, where 100% control of over DNA sequence may be mandatory, such as in whole genome assembly. We propose a novel standard, The Building Block Method, for both the construction of standard parts and their assembly | ||
+ | |||
+ | This Building Block standard can be either: | ||
+ | |||
+ | A) an interchangeable or | ||
+ | B) a non-interchangeable format, based on the desired use of the part. | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 17:44, 12 October 2009
Someething
The physical assembly of standard parts is currently a non-standard process, which can either come from direct genome PCR with restriction enzyme sites incorporated into the PCR primers, or overlap assembly PCR. Furthermore, current Biobrick construction standards [RFC 10,11,12 etc.] rely heavily on restriction enzyme based methods, which can be sequence, cost and time restrictive. This is especially true of large DNA assembly, where 100% control of over DNA sequence may be mandatory, such as in whole genome assembly. We propose a novel standard, The Building Block Method, for both the construction of standard parts and their assembly
This Building Block standard can be either:
A) an interchangeable or B) a non-interchangeable format, based on the desired use of the part.