Team:Bay Area RSI/Project

From 2009.igem.org

Revision as of 03:22, 22 October 2009 by Pokie22 (Talk | contribs)
Sunnyvale.jpeg

Breast cancer is the second most common type of cancer diagnosed in women. RNAi has proven to be an effective mechanism in the silencing of oncogenes. Therefore, we have attempted to build a viable system for the delivery of RNAi into breast cancer cells. First, we inserted a shRNA sequence coding for the Raf-1 protein into an AAV cassette containing two ITR's, allowing it to reproduce itself in mammalian cells. This cassette was inserted into our chosen vector, the filamentous bacteriophage FUSE-55. An antibody sequence was then added to the phage plasmid near the coat protein sequence in order to target HER2. As an additional feature, we have fused Silicatein and Silintaphin to mStrepavidin, which will bind to a protein tag in the coat, forming silicate structures on the coat of the phage, thereby reducing the immunotoxicity of the bacteriophage in vivo.

IMG 1568.JPG


Home The Team The Project Parts Submitted to the Registry Modeling Notebook


Contents

Overall project

Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer diagnosed in women.

To address the need for a novel breast cancer therapy, we designed a method of phage-mediated delivery of small interfering RNA using a breast cancer specific single chain antibody(scfv) fused to a phage coat protein. The scfv targets the Her2 receptor which is over-expressed in aggressive breast cancers. In addition, to decrease the immunologic response to the phage, we utilised two sponge-derived silicanizing proteins that will facilitate the formation of a silica coat.

Therefore, we designed a novel for the delivery of RNAi into breast cancer cells. First, we inserted a shRNA sequence coding for the Raf-1 protein into an AAV cassette containing two ITR's, allowing it to reproduce itself in mammalian cells. This cassette was inserted into our chosen vector, the filamentous bacteriophage FUSE-55. An antibody sequence was then added to the phage plasmid near the coat protein sequence in order to target HER2. As an additional feature, we have fused Silicatein and Silintaphin to mStrepavidin, which will bind to a protein tag in the coat, forming silicate structures on the coat of the phage, thereby reducing the immunotoxicity of the bacteriophage in vivo.

Motivation

Breast cancer is one of the more common kinds of cancer among women. We have designed a new treatment delivery method using Her2 receptors, which are over-expressed in about a quarter of breast cancers. Breast cancers that over-express Her2 have poorer prognosis than breast cancers without Her2 amplification. Therefore, we have attempted to build a viable system for the delivery of RNAi into breast cancer cells with many copies of the Her2 receptor.

Breast cancer is the seventh leading cause of death of women in the US, and the leading type of cancer diagnosed in women. To date, there are no therapies that specifically target breast cancer cells while delivering RNAi. Instead, current methodologies still rely on surgical excision of the malignant growth, non-specific systemic administration of cytotoxic drugs, or antibodies that induce non-specific apoptosis by an unknown mechanism. Therefore, to address the need for a novel breast cancer therapy, we designed a method of phage-mediated delivery of shRNA using a breast cancer-specific single-chain antibody that specifically targets breast cancer cells. In addition, to decrease the immunologic response to possible phagemid proteins, we encased the phage in a silica coat. We hope that our system opens the gateway for possible novel cancer therapies not premised on the classical technologies.

Experimental Overview

We targeted cells with Her2 amplification and used RNAi to turn off the Raf-1 gene, which is constitutively on in many cancers. First, we inserted an shRNA sequence coding for mRNA causing knockdown of Raf-1 expression into an AAV cassette containing two ITR's, allowing for episomal replication. This cassette was inserted into our chosen vector, the filamentous bacteriophage FUSE55. An antibody sequence was then added to the phage plasmid in order to target Her2. As an additional feature, we have fused Silicatein and Silintaphin to mStreptavidin, which will bind to a protein tag in the coat. This will cause silicate structures to form on the coat of the phage, thereby reducing the immunotoxicity of the bacteriophage in vivo.

Fuse55 cancer cell copy.jpeg

Project Details

Phage as a vehicle for gene delivery

Since the beginning of molecular biology, phages have been extensively used as a means to understand the transfer of genetic material. Additionally, owing to their evolutionary perfection for selfish replication, they have small genomes and are amenable to extensive genetic manipulation. As a part of the phage life cycle, the phage injects its genome into host cells and hegemonizes the host cellular machinery. It has been shown that phages can also be used to inject exogenous nucleic acid sequences. Thus, we utilized the phage as a platform for genetic transfer of small interfering RNA (RNAi).1 Another system utilizing EGF receptor displaying phages had been shown to effectively use the RNAi system, and thus receptor targeting by the phage became a crucial part of using the phage as a vehicle for gene delivery (2).

Phage Selection

Initially, single-stranded RNA phages such as Q-beta and MS2 appeared to be viable options. The single-stranded form of RNA was crucial in forming the short hairpin structure. In addition, the project design required a phage with a small genome size that has the ability to display fusion proteins on its coat surface. MS2 appeared to be the best option; however, further research on this phage showed a lack of information on its history of effectiveness in vitro. Since RNA phages did not match our criteria, DNA phages presented themselves as the next logical option. Phage fd-tet has a single phage chromosome (genome) bearing a single gene III coat protein, which accepts foreign DNA inserts (3). However, only 3-5 pIII (protein encoding geneIII)are displayed on the pahge surface. It is necessary for the phage to accept foreign DNA so that it displays the Her2 antibody, which will target breast cancer cells.4 Filamentous bacteriophage targeting has been successfully shown to work in the past.5 Also, established protocols on phage display of antibodies exist,6 thus making our specific system easier to achieve.

The incorporation of AAV (adeno-associated virus) ITRs into the fuse55 was another necessary aspect of the project. AAV vectors had been shown to be able to transduce mammalian genes; thus, they affected mammalian cells7, and they had been used in forming the short hairpin RNA structure needed for the RNAi system8. AAV helps inject the shRNA and the ITRs help make the hairpin structure, key for the RNAi process.

Fuse55-shRaf-ITR cassette
Insertion of shRaf into fuse55

Specific Targeting of Breast Cancer Cells via a Her2 single chain antibody (Her2-scfv)

One of the hallmarks of cancer is uncontrolled, aberrant cellular growth. In most cancer types, there is an absence of specific cancer markers. Instead, cancer cells exhibit upregulation or downregulation of endogenous proteins. Thus, specific targeting of cancer cells is problematic. However, tumor specific targeting has produced effective results in the past and has even been shown to produce tumor regression(9). Her2 is over-expressed in about one-fourth of all cases of breast cancer and is utilised as a target for current monoclonal antibody therapies such as Herceptin. When Her2scfv-bearing phage bind to Her2 receptors, the phage-Her2 receptor complex enters the cell via endocytosis. Once internalised, the aav-shRaf-1 cassette will undergo independent episomal replication and produce shRaf-1 RNAs.

Fuse55-her2scfv-linker-strep tag


Silicanization of Phage by Silicatein Alpha/Beta and Silintaphin

Silicatein and silintaphin have been used by sponges that have silica-based structures(11) and have been tested to encapsulate other structures such as bacteria(12). Silica is known to reduce immunotoxicity in the human body. Silintaphin and silicatein work together to produce silica structures for biomineralization and encapsulation of biological structures. As a result, the siliconized products are capable of entering biological system without inducing an immune response(13). We used two isoforms of silicatein (alpha and beta) from the silicaneous sponge, Tethya aurantia, and an optimised synthetic silintaphin from the silicaneous sponge, Suberites domuncula. The silicatein-silintaphin-streptavidin constructs were inserted into alphapp8-4m5.3, a yeast expression plasmid engineered for protein secretion. The silicatein-silintaphin-streptavidin fusion proteins were purified on streptactin columns and co-incubated with Her2-scfv-stepTag phage to allow for the silicanizing proteins to bind to the phage surface.

Potential Pitfalls

Cellular environments can affect the outcome of many of the project designs. One of the potential pitfalls would involve the improper folding of the short hairpin sequence coding for KD of Raf-1. Folding is affected by many external factors such as temperature and pH. Another problem could be improper attachment of the silica globules to the strep tag, because the proximity of the globules to the tag may not be ideal, resulting in partially coated phages. Another issue is that Her2 is expressed in normal cells in addition to cancerous cells. This could lead to the Her2-scfv antibody may finding and binding to a normal cell, thus shutting down the normal functioning of Raf-1. As discussed below, Raf-1 is a necessary protein involved in cell proliferation and differentiation, so shutting it down could be hazardous to the normal cell.


Future Plans/Endeavors

Future extensions to the aim of this project could be made in the form of modification of the specific types of receptors or gene sequences targeted for a more effective knockdown of various types of cancer cells. Genes to consider might include sequences involved in cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, mitotic checkpoints, and so forth. On the other hand, the applications of the RNAi phage delivery system could be tested in different types of cells attacked by various types of cancer. Finally, different materials used in coating of the phage could be utilized and tested for better immunotoxicity response. Some other materials to consider might include gold, which has been known to not cause a reaction of the skin, and could thus be useful in targeting carcinomas.

Background

HER2

Her2 is a member of the erbB family of receptors and a receptor tyrosine kinase. ErbB receptors require a ligand such as a growth factor, and receptor tyrosine kinases add phosphate to tyrosine residues, essentially activating the receptor and allowing it to be a docking site for other proteins to become active. This receptor is involved in signal transduction mechanisms of cell proliferation. The erbB receptors require dimerization upon binding with its ligand EGF. Her2 itself has no ligand, but Her2 is the receptor that can dimerize with any of the other receptors in the family such as Her1 and Her3. Thus it is a favorite in terms of cancer because it is ligand-independent and quick to dimerize. It can become activated and provide a docking site for proteins to become active. One such protein affected by receptor tyrosine kinases is Raf-1.

http://www.nature.com/clpt/journal/v81/n6/images/6100160f1.jpg


RAF-1

Raf-1 is a protein kinase involved in the MAP kinase pathway. Raf-1 is a MAP kinase kinase kinase which is activated by Ras. Once activated, it can phosphorylate downstream kinases like MEK1. Ultimately, this pathway helps in cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration, because MEK turns “on” ERK which is a transcription factor for genes such as cell proliferation.

Thanks to http://www.jpp.krakow.pl/journal/archive/1203_s3/articles/11_article.html:


Rafpathway.jpeg

Functional Designs Goals for Fuse55 Plasmid

1. AAV vector is a part of the plasmid because it provides inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) which allow for the formation of hairpin structure due to its symmetry. It also assists in integration of viral DNA into genomic DNA of the host.

2. shRNA RAF-1 sequence forms the hairpin structure when it is transcribed. This allows it to be degraded in the RNAi process causing it to degrade other Raf-1 mRNAs, which match the sequence.

3. Her2 antibody binds to the Her2 receptor on breast cancer cells.

4. mStreptavidin to bind to silica globules and encapsulate the phage.

Part 2

The Experiments

Part 3

Results

[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K184000 BBa_K184000]


[http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K184001 BBa_K184001]

References

1. Grimm, Dirk, and Mark A. Kay. "RNAi and Gene Therapy: A Mutual Attraction." Hematology. (2007): 473-481.

2. Jiang, Hua, Xiu-mei Cai, Bi-zhi Shi, Jie Zhang, and Zong-hai Li. "Development of efficient RNA interference system using EGF-displaying phagemid particles." Acta Pharmacol Sin. 29.4 (2008): 437-442.

3. “Explanation of the Smith Lab Phage Display Vectors” <www.biosci.missouri.edu/smithgp/PhageDisplayWebsite/vectors.doc>

4. Hajitou, Amin, Martin Trepel, et al. "A Hybrid Vector for Ligand-Directed Tumor Targeting and Molecular Imaging." Cell. 125. (2006): 385-398.

5. Larocca, David, Paul D. Kassner, Alison Witte, Robert Charles Ladner, and Glenn F. Pierce. "Gene transfer to mammalian cells using genetically targeted filamentous bacteriophage." FASEB. 13. (1999): 727-734.

6. Benhar, Itai, and Yoram Reiter. "Phage Display of Single-Chain Antibody Constructs." Current Protocols in Immunology. (2002): 10.19B.1-10.19B.31.

7. Hajitou, Amin, et al . "Design and construction of targeted AAVP vectors for mammalian cell transduction." Nature Protocols. 2.3 (2007): 523-531.

8. Grimm, Dirk, Kusum Pandey, and Mark A. Kay. "Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors for Short Hairpin RNA Expression." Methods in Enzymology. 392. (2005): 381-405.

9. Eriksson, Fredrik, W. David Culp, Robert Massey, Lars Egevad, and Donita Garland. "Tumor specific phage particles promote tumor regression in a mouse melanoma model." Cancer Immunology Immunother. 56. (2007): 677-687.

10. Sapinoro, Ramil, Ketna Volcy, W. W. Shanaka, I. Rodrigo, and Jacob J. Shlesinger. "Fc receptor-mediated, antibody-dependent enhancement of bacteriophage lambda-mediated gene transfer in mammalian cells." Virology. 373.2 (2008): 274-286.

11. Muller, Werner, Xiaohong Wang, Fu-Zhai Cui, Klaus Peter Jochum, and Wolfgang Tremel. "Sponge spicules as blueprints for the biofabrication of inorganic–organic composites and biomaterials." Appl Microbiology Biotechnology. 83. (2009): 397-413.

12. Muller, Werner, Sylvia Engel, Xiaohong Wang, Stephen Wolf, and Wolfgang Tremel. "Bioencapsulation of living bacteria (Escherichia coli) with poly(silicate) after transformation with silicatein-alpha gene." Biomaterials. 29.7 (2008): 771-9.

13. Wiens, Matthias, Melanie Bausen, Felipe Natalio, Thorben Link, and Ute Schlossmacher. "The role of the silicatein-a interactor silintaphin-1 in biomimetic biomineralization." Biomaterials. 30. (2009): 1648-1656.

14. Yarden, Yosef. "Biology of HER2 and Its Importance in Breast Cancer." Oncology. 61. (2001): 1-13.

Safety

  1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
         * researcher safety,
         * public safety, or
         * environmental safety? 

No because everything was contained in the lab and disposed of in the proper biohazard containers. Nothing in the project should have reached the environment or outside to the general public, since it involved standard procedures such as PCR, gel electrophoresis, restriction digests, etc. Researcher safety was important because we used ethidium bromide for gels, but we took appropriate measures not to have contact with the chemical. We also wore safety masks to view gels under UV.

  2. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

No, the institution does not have one.

  3. What does your local biosafety group think about your project?

N/A

  4. Do any of the new BioBrick parts that you made this year raise any safety issues?

No. Again we used fairly standard and contained lab procedures (refer question 1).

         * If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry? 

N/A