Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico/Wet Lab/Experiments

From 2009.igem.org

Revision as of 23:45, 21 October 2009 by Jurquiza (Talk | contribs)



C1a growth plot


C1a is a k12-derivative strain. In order to know the behavior of this strain we did a growth curve. Every four hours two samples were taken from a C1a culture. We measured the optical density (OD) (550nm) of one of those samples, and the other was used to do dilutions and to plate them. The results are shown in the next table.

 tiempo (hrs)	DO 550nm	UFC/ml
 0		0.0355		1207000
 2		0.2533		25450000
 4		0.944		160000000
 6		1.2194		165000000

A non-linear regression method was used to generate a logistic formula with the best adjustment.
UFC OD.png
The unit time is hours, the y correspond to UFC and OD, respectively, and the x correspond to time

Both formulas were used to infer a correlation formula between OD and UFC, this formula was used to translate the OD measures to UFC. FormulaeODvsUFC.png


T3 and T7 infection plot

Without system

Growth T3 t7.png

With system

Burst size determination

Without system

With system

Test parts and devices


Multipromoter

Functionality was tested qualitatively using the strain BL21(DE3)pLysS that have an IPTG inducible T7 RNA polymerase; different conditions were tested Bl21/multipromoter IPTG+, Bl21/multipromoter IPTG- and Bl21/no-multipromoter IPTG+.

Gfp multi.JPG

In frame is BL21/multipromoter with IPTG inducer, unfortunately the microscope and camera was not suitable to check in full detail the BL21/non-multipromoter IPTG+ which gave no florescence and Bl21/multipromoter IPTG- which presented a diminished florescence.

This result was only for T7 RNA polymerase but we are planning to implement a better assay system to include a WT T3 & T7 RNA polymerase, a plasmid that have GFP and not the multipromoter and a strain that doesn't have T7 RNA polymerase. Also we need to clone the biocrick in a plasmid that only has our multipromoter and no other in the same direction in order to avoid licking from near upstream promoters, this is important because we are using quite toxic bacterial proteins that will be induced under the presence of T3 or T7 so the estimate of the basal transcription its important to test the viability of our death system.

Quorum sensing system

Quorumdevice.jpg The quorum sensing device

After assembling the quorum sensing device, we will turn on the system by either T3 or T7 RNA polymerases. We expect to see green florescence at the point of induction and red in the neighborhood. At this time the toxines won't be in the construction to avoid the noise caused by the bacteria death. AHL spatial dynamics are simulated using the Cellular Automata. The final goal of the Quorum sensing system is to decrease even more the burst size by delaying capsid assembly using the asRNA that is designed to interfere with the phage's replication machinery.

Quorum.png
An AHL difussion example when an infection occurs

asRNA

We will induce the asRNA construction with IPTG, afterwards we expect the infection of T7 and T3 to be with less efficiency of plaquing and/or smaller plaques. We will also induce the expression of the asRNA in a liquid medium and perform a growth curve. We expect that the decay is going to be slower and/or to a higer OD (with more resistant bacteria).

Toxins

The colicines (E3 and E9) will be under the transcriptional regulation of the promoter induced by IPTG. We will do a growth curve following the same procedure used to do the c1a growth curve as performed above . We will feedback the model with these results. We expect this curve to decay before the wild type curve. We will do another curve using the same procedure described in the section phage infection curve but without phages and with the induction with IPTG in the time zero. We expect the growth curve obtained to decay before than that of the phages infection curve. We hope the toxic activyty of the toxins will be faster enough to kill the bacteria before the phages.



Locations of visitors to this page