"
Minnesota/30 June 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|'''[[Minnesota/29 June 2009|Go to Previous Day (June 29)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/1 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 1)]]''' | |'''[[Minnesota/29 June 2009|Go to Previous Day (June 29)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/1 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 1)]]''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
| - | <br> | + | '''Patrick'''<br> |
| + | Here is the "leaky" graph along with the base for comparison:<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <center><gallery widths=300 heights=200> | ||
| + | Image:badBase.jpg|Figure 1 - Base TTN Model | ||
| + | Image:Leak.jpg|Figure 2 - Leaky Model | ||
| + | </gallery></center><br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | As can be seen the "leaky" graph indeed does show increased GFP production at low aTc concentrations.<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Ben'''<br> | ||
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky11.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br> | [[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky11.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br> | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 30 July 2009
| Back to Notebook Home | |
| Go to Previous Day (June 29) | Go to Next Day (July 1) |
Patrick
Here is the "leaky" graph along with the base for comparison:
 Figure 1 - Base TTN Model |
 Figure 2 - Leaky Model |
As can be seen the "leaky" graph indeed does show increased GFP production at low aTc concentrations.
Ben
