Minnesota/9 July 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {|style="align:left" width="965" |- |''' Back to Notebook Home''' |- |'''Go to Previous Day (July 8)'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/10...)
Line 5: Line 5:
|'''[[Minnesota/8 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 8)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/10 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 10)]]'''
|'''[[Minnesota/8 July 2009|Go to Previous Day (July 8)]]'''|| width=158|'''[[Minnesota/10 July 2009|Go to Next Day (July 10)]]'''
|}
|}
 +
'''Patrick'''<br>
 +
Today I received and analyzed the three models created yesterday, smad_ttn_gfp_u, smad_ttn_gfp_d, smad_ttn_gfp_d2. Below are the first two models, where the kinetic constant for reaction 10 (gfp -->) was raised and lowered by an order of magnitude (from 3.21E-05 1/s). The base is shown for comparison:<br>
 +
 +
<center><gallery widths=300 heights=200>
 +
Image:base.jpg|Figure 1: Base TTN Model
 +
Image:gfp_u.jpg|Figure 2: Increased GFP Decomposition Rate (3.21E-04)
 +
Image:gfp_d.jpg|Figure 3: Decreased GFP Decomposition Rate (3.21E-06)
 +
</center></gallery><br>

Revision as of 19:03, 30 July 2009

Back to Notebook Home
Go to Previous Day (July 8)Go to Next Day (July 10)

Patrick
Today I received and analyzed the three models created yesterday, smad_ttn_gfp_u, smad_ttn_gfp_d, smad_ttn_gfp_d2. Below are the first two models, where the kinetic constant for reaction 10 (gfp -->) was raised and lowered by an order of magnitude (from 3.21E-05 1/s). The base is shown for comparison: