Team:Alberta/DNAanchor

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 52: Line 52:
<center>
<center>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/f/f5/Anchorcomparison.png">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/f/f5/Anchorcomparison.png">
-
<p><B>Table 1:</B> Overview of three different anchoring systems that were considered for BioBytes. See the section on <B>Anchor Binding Capacity Experiments</B> for further information on these systems. 5' Biotin (BTN), single stranded DNA (ssDNA), nucleotide (nt), double stranded DNA (dsDNA).<p>
+
<p><B>Table 1:</B> Overview of three different anchoring systems that were considered for BioBytes. See the section on <B>Anchor Binding Capacity Experiments</B> below for further information on these systems. 5' Biotin (BTN), single stranded DNA (ssDNA), nucleotide (nt), double stranded DNA (dsDNA).<p>
</center>
</center>
<br>
<br>
Line 91: Line 91:
<p>
<p>
-
As seen in <B>Table 1</B>, we considered three main types of anchor systems.  The simplest being a 5' biotinylated 20 nt ssDNA anchor.  The product brochure for the paramagnetic streptavidin beads from NEB claimed that the binding capacity of such an oligo is 500 pmol mg<sup>-1</sup> beads.
+
As seen in <B>Table 1</B>, we considered three main types of anchor systems.  The simplest being a 5' biotinylated 20 nt ssDNA anchor.  The product brochure for the paramagnetic streptavidin beads from NEB (Cat. # S1420S) claimed that the binding capacity of such an oligo is 500 pmol mg<sup>-1</sup> beads. We did not bother to confirm this as this anchor does not allow for ligation of incoming Bytes to it, as there is no complementary strand for which the incoming Byte may ligate to. There is also no mechanism to release the construct from the bead, other than boiling the beads (which is not desireable). </p>
 +
 
 +
<p>
 +
 
 +
A simple anchor system we developed first was one whereby we use 5'biotinylated forward primers without the incorporation of deoxyuracils, and uracil containing universal reverse primers (pAB_R and pBA_R).  PCR is conducted in the presence of the Byte you wish to make your Anchor and the result is amplified 5' biotinylated pAB/pBA insert (gene) with a 3' uracil containing end.  The characteristic 12 base overhangs are generated by USER digestion, however since the biotinylated forward primers did not contain uracils, only the 3' end of the PCR product was acted upon by USER, thus only the 3' end of the "Byte" had an overhang.  This was then directly bound to the beads.  The one advantage of this system is the anchor itself is a Byte and contributes directly to the final construct size.  However, it can only be released by NotI digestion (a consequence of the forward primer sequences used).  Most importantly, it was found that this method of anchoring had terrible binding capacities due to the lack of a ssDNA spacer region between the 5' biotin and the dsDNA region, since the whole Anchor is now double stranded.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>Binding capacities of the beads for the two anchor systems tested were conducted by two basic methods: 1) binding a varying amount of Anchor to a constant amount of beads (or vise-versa) and after incubation for 10-20 minutes measure the remaining amount of free Anchor in solution; and 2) after the first assay the beads with anchor bound are washed thoroughly and the anchors are released enzymatically thereafter the amount of released anchor is measured.</p>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 

Revision as of 07:09, 21 October 2009

University of Alberta - BioBytes










































































































DNA Anchor/Terminator

Anchoring System

A vital component of the BioBytes method is the use of a biotinylated DNA Anchor in order to allow unidirectional assembly of the Bytes on paramagnetic beads by sequestering the 5' ends of Bytes, leaving only the 3' ends available to bind incomding Bytes. The Anchor itself has three vital components: A 5’ biotinylation, a double stranded DNA (dsDNA) portion that incorporates a release mechanism in order to liberate the construct from the beads, and A or B overhangs to allow Bytes to bind to the Anchor. Our team has considered a number anchor systems, each with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. The three main anchor systems we investigated are summarized below. See Table 1.


Table 1: Overview of three different anchoring systems that were considered for BioBytes. See the section on Anchor Binding Capacity Experiments below for further information on these systems. 5' Biotin (BTN), single stranded DNA (ssDNA), nucleotide (nt), double stranded DNA (dsDNA).


The current BioBytes anchor system utilizes a 5’-biotin which anchors the construct to beads by binding non-covalently, but with great strength, to the covalently linked streptavidin on the surface of the paramagnetic beads. There is also a 5’-15 nucleotide spacer region of ssDNA which facilitates more efficient binding of the Anchor to the bead as the binding pocket of streptavidin is deep and thus a highly flexible ssDNA linker is recommended to allow the biotin to effectively bind into this deep pocket. A 21 bp double stranded portion of the Anchor contains the I-SceI recognition sequence, which when digested with I-SceI produces 4 base overhangs, but also includes four deoxyuracil residues. These uracils are excised by New England Biolab’s USERTM system to generate single nucleotide gaps in the top strand. USERTM digestion thus effectively destroys the Anchor and produces a 21 base 3’ overhang which becomes important for recircularization of the construct. Finally the Anchor contains the A or B 3’ overhangs complementary to those of the Bytes, allowing their binding to the Anchor. See Figure 1.


Figure 1: pAB and pBA multiple cloning sites with highlighted primers prA1/B1u and prA2/B2u annealing regions.


Termination System

Once the construct has been completed, i.e. the last Byte has been added, the construct may be released from the beads as is by a simple I-SceI digestion or a USERTM digestion, thus yielding a linear construct. If a circular construct, such as a plasmid, is desired then a final "Terminator" piece must be added. This piece is similar in construction to the Anchor, whereby there is a dsDNA I-SceI recognition sequence with four deoxyuracils incorporated into it on one strand, as well as an A or B 3' overhang. The Terminator binds to the last Byte and release is once again achieved by I-SceI digestion or USERTM digestion. In either case both the Anchor and Terminator develop sticky ends that are complementary to eachother: 4 bases if I-SceI digestion is utilized, or 21 bases if USER is used. USERTM digestion is obviously preferred since 21 bp of interaction will form spontaneously and without ligation, and thus transformation of the construct can proceed immediately. See Figure 1.

Anchor Binding Capacity Experiments

As seen in Table 1, we considered three main types of anchor systems. The simplest being a 5' biotinylated 20 nt ssDNA anchor. The product brochure for the paramagnetic streptavidin beads from NEB (Cat. # S1420S) claimed that the binding capacity of such an oligo is 500 pmol mg-1 beads. We did not bother to confirm this as this anchor does not allow for ligation of incoming Bytes to it, as there is no complementary strand for which the incoming Byte may ligate to. There is also no mechanism to release the construct from the bead, other than boiling the beads (which is not desireable).

A simple anchor system we developed first was one whereby we use 5'biotinylated forward primers without the incorporation of deoxyuracils, and uracil containing universal reverse primers (pAB_R and pBA_R). PCR is conducted in the presence of the Byte you wish to make your Anchor and the result is amplified 5' biotinylated pAB/pBA insert (gene) with a 3' uracil containing end. The characteristic 12 base overhangs are generated by USER digestion, however since the biotinylated forward primers did not contain uracils, only the 3' end of the PCR product was acted upon by USER, thus only the 3' end of the "Byte" had an overhang. This was then directly bound to the beads. The one advantage of this system is the anchor itself is a Byte and contributes directly to the final construct size. However, it can only be released by NotI digestion (a consequence of the forward primer sequences used). Most importantly, it was found that this method of anchoring had terrible binding capacities due to the lack of a ssDNA spacer region between the 5' biotin and the dsDNA region, since the whole Anchor is now double stranded.

Binding capacities of the beads for the two anchor systems tested were conducted by two basic methods: 1) binding a varying amount of Anchor to a constant amount of beads (or vise-versa) and after incubation for 10-20 minutes measure the remaining amount of free Anchor in solution; and 2) after the first assay the beads with anchor bound are washed thoroughly and the anchors are released enzymatically thereafter the amount of released anchor is measured.