"
Team:Alberta/Project/Outreach
From 2009.igem.org
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</HTML> | </HTML> | ||
| + | |||
<html> | <html> | ||
| Line 79: | Line 80: | ||
<table width=75% style="background:#FFFFFF; padding:2px;"> | <table width=75% style="background:#FFFFFF; padding:2px;"> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td style="height: 400; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 11px;"> | <td style="height: 400; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 10px; padding-top: 11px;"> | ||
| Line 84: | Line 87: | ||
<div class="Outreach"> | <div class="Outreach"> | ||
<div style="height: 400; background:#FFFFFF; colorou line-height:100% padding: 3px 0px;"> | <div style="height: 400; background:#FFFFFF; colorou line-height:100% padding: 3px 0px;"> | ||
| - | <h1>Debate | + | <h1>Ethics Debate</h1> |
<!-- <div align="justify" style="padding-left:20px; padding-right:20px"> --> | <!-- <div align="justify" style="padding-left:20px; padding-right:20px"> --> | ||
<div align="justify"> | <div align="justify"> | ||
| - | < | + | <h3> Why a Debate? </h3> |
| - | + | <p> The purpose of this debate is to acknowledge, analyse and discuss the many viewpoints surrounding synthetic biology. We hope viewing this debate will help you clarify your own opinion of synthetic biology, so that you may better contribute to determining the future directions of this emerging field. </p> | |
| - | <p> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | < | + | <h3> Meet the Debaters </h3> |
| + | <p> The debaters featured are members of the University of Alberta Debate Society. Several of these debaters will be competing at the World Debate Championships in Turkey this winter, and all have competed at a national level. The debaters we feature are from a variety of backgrounds, to represent many different perceptions of synthetic biology. Debaters were supplied with only the resolution and no other background information. <p> | ||
| - | <p> < | + | <p> First Propostion - <b>graduate student in Computer Science</b> </p> |
| + | <p> First Opposition - <b>in the military reserve</b></p> | ||
| + | <p> Second Proposition - <b>undergraduate student, double major in Mathematics and Linguistics</b></p> | ||
| + | <p> Second Opposition - <b>undergraduate student in Political Science</b></p> | ||
| + | <p> Third Proposition - <b>undergraduate student in Microbiology</b></p> | ||
| + | <p> Third Opposition - <b>student in English, BA in Classics </b></p> | ||
| + | <p> Fourth Proposition - <b>undergraduate student in Philosophys</b></p> | ||
| + | <p> Fourth Opposition - <b>undergraduate student in Philosophy and Political Science</b></p> | ||
| + | <h3> Style of Debate </h3> | ||
| + | <p>This debate is in British Parliamentary style, the style used at the Debate World Championships. This style of debate is set in parliament, and debaters take the role of government parties discussing policies. There are four teams of two people: two proposition teams argue for the motion, and two opposition teams argue against it. The first and second speaker on a side are on the same team, and the third and fourth speaker on a side are on the same team. Only the two debaters within a team plan their arguments together, and the two teams arguing on the same side compete with each other to argue better. The second team is expected to present an 'extension' consisting of new constructive arguments. The debaters address the Speaker of the House and entertain questions, called Points of Information, from debaters arguing the opposite side of the issue. Debaters can stand up to ask a question at any time except the first and last minute of a speech. The speaker may either wave them down or take their question. All speeches are seven minutes. The last speaker on each side summarizes the debate.</p> | ||
<font size="2"> | <font size="2"> | ||
Revision as of 01:53, 21 October 2009
 |
|
|
High School OutreachPresentations completed : 7Number of students reached so far: ~230We have six more presentation scheduled between November and January, which will bring the total number of students we've reached to ~440!Our outreach component consists of presentations and pamphlets for high school and junior high school students about synthetic biology, iGEM, and our project. We’re doing this outreach primarily for the high school students’ own interest and benefit. Synthetic biology is rapidly changing the biotechnology industry, and an understanding of synthetic biology would enrich a student’s consideration of career choices. Becoming excited about a potential career option can also provide motivation for academic success. Our outreach is also a service to the research community, as the more students who know about synthetic biology, the more who may pursue it as a career. A greater pool of human resources can increase the quantity and quality of research We believe that sharing one’s research with the community is an important responsibility, both to keep research accountable to the public and to open doors for the next generation to get involved. Even for those students who don’t pursue science, an exposure to what synthetic biology is allows them to make more informed, responsible choices as consumers and voters. Thus, through high school outreach, we’re setting a good example of good example of corporate social responsibility. Finally, we strive to learn how to better communicate synthetic biology to students. In order to evaluate the impact of our outreach, we collect feedback forms after presentations and have an online survey. |
Ethics DebateWhy a Debate?The purpose of this debate is to acknowledge, analyse and discuss the many viewpoints surrounding synthetic biology. We hope viewing this debate will help you clarify your own opinion of synthetic biology, so that you may better contribute to determining the future directions of this emerging field. Meet the DebatersThe debaters featured are members of the University of Alberta Debate Society. Several of these debaters will be competing at the World Debate Championships in Turkey this winter, and all have competed at a national level. The debaters we feature are from a variety of backgrounds, to represent many different perceptions of synthetic biology. Debaters were supplied with only the resolution and no other background information.
First Propostion - graduate student in Computer Science First Opposition - in the military reserve Second Proposition - undergraduate student, double major in Mathematics and Linguistics Second Opposition - undergraduate student in Political Science Third Proposition - undergraduate student in Microbiology Third Opposition - student in English, BA in Classics Fourth Proposition - undergraduate student in Philosophys Fourth Opposition - undergraduate student in Philosophy and Political Science Style of DebateThis debate is in British Parliamentary style, the style used at the Debate World Championships. This style of debate is set in parliament, and debaters take the role of government parties discussing policies. There are four teams of two people: two proposition teams argue for the motion, and two opposition teams argue against it. The first and second speaker on a side are on the same team, and the third and fourth speaker on a side are on the same team. Only the two debaters within a team plan their arguments together, and the two teams arguing on the same side compete with each other to argue better. The second team is expected to present an 'extension' consisting of new constructive arguments. The debaters address the Speaker of the House and entertain questions, called Points of Information, from debaters arguing the opposite side of the issue. Debaters can stand up to ask a question at any time except the first and last minute of a speech. The speaker may either wave them down or take their question. All speeches are seven minutes. The last speaker on each side summarizes the debate. |
