Team:Duke

From 2009.igem.org

Revision as of 03:58, 20 October 2009 by Zhup (Talk | contribs)

Duke University's iGEM team consists of 6 undergraduate students, 2 graduate students, and 2 professors. Due to the high costs and inefficiency of the process of cloning a gene, the DUKE iGEM team has invented a new procedure which lowers costs and also increases efficiency. This method, Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC), saves time as well, since this method does not involve ligation or restriction enzymes. The rising costs of the current method of producing biodegradable plastics has hindered its widespread use; however, this year's IGEM team has discovered a more efficient pathway to produce these biodegradable plastics. With this team's determination and motivation, they would like to present their two projects:

CPEC applied to biobricks & Biodegradable Plastic Synthesis Pathway in E. coli.


What is CPEC?

Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC) is the development of a much simplified sequence-independent cloning technology based entirely on the polymerase extension mechanism. This method extends overlapping regions between the insert and vector fragments to form a complete circular plasmid. An extremely simple theory, CPEC piggybacks PCR in splicing genes. The gene insert is modified to have ends that overlap with the ends of the linearized vector and both have similar melting temperatures. The insert and vector are placed within a PCR machine in the absence of primers. Denaturation separates the double-stranded insert and vector and the overlapping ends anneal. Polymerase extension mechanism is then used to complete the plasmid.

Duke igem 2006 logo 600dpi.jpg
Figure 1a. Biobrick spliced into vector using CPEC
Figure 1b. Multicomponent Biobrick system spliced into vector in one step using CPEC


What are benefits?

The process of high-throughput cloning is bottlenecked at the restriction and ligation stages. A combination of high costs, requirements for restriction site specific enzymes and general inefficiency of the process makes cloning on a large combinatorial gene library inviable. Circular Polymerase Extension Cloning (CPEC) addresses this issue by eliminating the need for restriction and ligation enzymes and thereby streamlining and condensing the procedure into the duration of 5 minutes.

Advantages/Disadvantages of BioBricks

  • BioBrick parts can be incorporated in E. coli , due to its common interphase.
  • BioBrick parts are not easily made due to its site-specific cutting of the plasmid.

Standardized CPEC

We will apply CPEC in the construction of a multi-component plasmid containing biobricks. Previous Duke iGEM projects have yielded the genes in a metabolic pathway that synthesizes poly(3HB-co-4HB), a biodegradable plastic, in E. coli. We will transform those genes into biobricks, with sticky ends, and efficiently combine them in a vector using CPEC.

Biodegradable Plastic Synthesis Pathway in E. coli

Polyhydroxyalkanoic acids (PHA), naturally occurring storage polymers found in a variety of bacteria, have received increased attention for their potential use as bioplastics that are both biodegradable and reduce reliance on petroleum-based plastics. In particular, the copolymer poly(3-hyroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate), or poly(3HB-co-4HB), which combines the 3HB and 4HB polymers from different bacteria, has elastic properties ideal for a wide range of thermoplastic applications. The high cost of PHA, however, is the biggest impediment to widespread use of bioplastics. Moreover, poly(3HB-co-4HB) pathways developed so far in /E. coli/ have yielded undesirably low and unpredictable 4HB-to-3HB ratios.

Thus, this project aims to develop a more efficient biopathway for poly(3HB-co-4HB) while increasing the 4HB monomer composition predictably. It was hypothesized that optimizing codon permutations of the phaC gene would greatly increase affinity of PHA synthase to the 4HB monomer. To date, the phaCAB and cat2 operons have been cloned into pUC19 and PCR Blunt II-TOPO vectors for successful independent production of the 3HB and 4HB polymers. Ligation and transformation into /E. coli/ as six different recombinant constructs will soon be completed and allow for engineering of the poly(3HB-co4HB) biopathway. Future directions would be to test the hypothesis to see if phaC can be manipulated to increase 4HB-to-3HB composition in poly(3HB-co-4HB) and to increase efficient production of the bioplastic by engineering the FtsZ cell division protein to allow for cells to accumulate larger quantities of PHA granules before dividing. Ultimately, once an optimal biopathway is found, the goal would be to explore a model for mass production of PHA bioplastics so that novel applications of bioplastics can be feasible economically.

Figure 2


Duke University iGEM Calendar

Below are several important milestones:

June
MTWTFSS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
July
MTWTFSS
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
August
MTWTFSS
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

September
MTWTFSS
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
October
MTWTFSS
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
November
MTWTFSS
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30



Contents

Part 1

Back to top
PCR
5x HF buffer 5 ul
dNTPs 2 ul
forward primer 1.25 ul
reverse primer 1.25 ul
DNA template (plasmid) 0.5 ul
Phusion DNA polymerase 0.3 ul
H2O 14.7 ul
________________________________
25 ul


Part 2

Back to top
Part 2 stuff

Contents

  1. Materials
  2. Methods

Materials

Back to top
materials

Methods

Back to top
methods

Restriction Enzymes

6/3/09
Experiment: PCR with contents of tube labeled 7 as DNA template, Gel with 100 bp ladder to check PCR
Results: Incorrect ladder and template
Conclusion: Should use 1 kb ladder, Need to find correct template

6/4/09
E: Gel to check Bioplastics #1-5
R: All correct sized bands
C: Use one as template for PCR

E: PCR with Bioplastics #5 as template

5x HF buffer 5 ul
dNTPs 2 ul
forward primer 1.25 ul
reverse primer 1.25 ul
DNA template (plasmid) 0.5 ul
Phusion DNA polymerase 0.3 ul
H2O 14.7 ul
25 ul

98°C 30s 1x
98°C 15s
55°C 30s
72°C 1m 10s 35x
72°C 5m
4°C infinity 1x

Fragment # Name Size/Length
1 pASKphaA 4.2 kb
2 phaB 900 bp
3 Termcat2 1.7 kb
4 phaC 1.9 kb

6/5/09
E: Gel to check PCR
R: Correct band for fragments 2 and 4, No band for fragments 1 and 3
C: Cut correct bands out of gel, Try PCR with another template, different conditions

E: PCR with Bioplastics #1 as template, increased extension time to 1m 20s

6/6/09
R: Correct band for fragments 1 (weak) and 2, No band for fragments 3 and 4
C: Cut out correct bands, Do PCR again with same template for fragments 1 and 2, Try PCR with different template for fragments 3 and 4

E: PCR with Bioplastics #1 (fragments 1 and 2) and #3 (fragments 3 and 4) as templates


6/8/09
E: Gel to check PCR, Gel with leftover PCR of right sized fragments
R: Correct bands for all fragments
C: Cut out bands

6/9/09
Gel Extraction
1. Weigh cut gel piece(s). Add at least 1 ul binding buffer per mg of gel.
2. Place tube at 50-60°C for 10-15 min or until gel is completely dissolved. Vortex every few minutes.
3. Add solution to spin column. Centrifuge at max speed for 30s. Discard filtrate.
4. Add 300 ul binding buffer to column. Centrifuge for 30s. Discard filtrate.
5. Add 500 ul wash buffer. Centrifuge for 30s. Discard filtrate.
6. Repeat step 5.
7. Centrifuge tubes for at least 2 min. Discard collection tube.
8. Obtain 1.7 ml centrifuge tube. Add 40-50 ul elution buffer to spin column. Centrifuge for 1 min. Discard spin column.

E: Measured concentration of DNA fragments
R: Very low concentrations of fragments 1 and 3
C: Do PCR with fragments as template, greater volume to increase amount

E: PCR with fragments 1 and 3 as templates

6/10/09
E: Gel to check PCR
R: Smears at bottom of gel
C: Should use Bioplastics #1 as template to increase amount of fragment 1 and Bioplastics #3 as template to increase amount of fragment

E: PCR with Bioplastics #1 and #3 as templates and doubled volume, Gel to obtain more of fragments
R: Smears for fragment 1, Correct bands for fragment 2, Correct bands and smears for fragment 3
C: PCR with different conditions

E: PCR with Bioplastics #3 as template, extension time increased to 1m 30s, cycles increased to 40

6/11/09
E: Gels to check PCR
R: Correct bands for fragment 1, 2 and 4 and possibly correct band for fragment 3
C: Cut out bands

E: Measured concentration of DNA fragments
R: Still low concentrations of fragments 1 and 3
C: Do more PCRs to obtain more of fragments 1 and 3


6/15/09
E: PCRs with Bioplastics #1 (fragments 1 and 2) and #3 (fragments 3 and 4) as templates, doubled volume, eliminated annealing step, varied extension (plus annealing) time based on fragment size, Gels to check PCRs

5x HF buffer 10 ul
dNTPs 4 ul
forward primer 2.5 ul
reverse primer 2.5 ul
DNA template (plasmid) 1 ul
Phusion DNA polymerase 0.8 ul
H2O 29.2 ul
50 ul

98°C 30s 1x
98°C 15s
72°C varies 35x
72°C 5m
4°C infinity 1x

Annealing Time: 30s
Extension Time: 15 s * size/length (kb)

Fragment # Name Size/Length (bp) Time (s)
1 pASKphaA 4215 100
2 phaB 896 50
3 Termcat2 1701 60
4 phaC 1872 65

R: Bands for fragments 1 and 2, No bands for fragments 3 and 4
C: Cut out bands of fragments 1 and 2, PCR again to obtain fragments 3 and 4

6/16/09
E: PCR with Bioplastics #2 as template and Phusion mix (done by Maggie), Gels to check PCRs

2x Phusion mix 25 ul
forward primer 2.5 ul
reverse primer 2.5 ul
DNA template (plasmid) 1 ul
H2O 19 ul
50 ul

R: No bands for fragments 3, Bands for fragment 4
C: Cut out bands of fragment 4, PCR again to obtain fragment 3

E: Measured concentration of DNA fragments 1 and 2
R: Concentrations okay
C: Do assembly PCR once enough of fragments 3 and 4 obtained

6/17/09
E: PCR with Bioplastics #4 as template, using Phusion enzyme protocol (shorter denaturation time, lower annealing temperature), Gel to check PCRs

98°C 15s 1x
98°C 1s
50°C 5s
72°C 30s 35x
72°C 2m
4°C infinity 1x

R: Correct bands
C: Cut out bands

E: Measured concentration of DNA fragments 3 and 4
R: Concentrations high
C: Do assembly PCR


6/18/09
E: Assembly PCR, Gels to check PCRs

2x Phusion mix 12.5 ul
insert 7.14 ul
H2O 5.36 ul
25 ul

98°C 30s 1x
98°C 10s
70-55°C 5s
72°C 30s 25x
72°C 2m
4°C infinity 1x

Fragment # Name Size/Length (bp) Concentration (ng/ul) Mass (ng) Volume (ul)
1 pASKphaA 4215 41 194 4.73
2 phaB 896 68 41 0.60
3 Termcat2 1701 69 78 1.13
4 phaC 1872 126 86 0.68
~400 7.14

Length of plasmid: 8360 bp + 4 Histags * 6 aa * 3 bp = 8432 bp

R: Smear because of misformed gel, no band
C: Change conditions

6/19/09
E: Assembly PCR (done by Maggie) with different conditions (decreased extension time, increased number of cycles)

5x HF buffer 5 ul
dNTPs 2 ul
insert 7.18 ul
Phusion DNA polymerase 0.4 ul
H2O 10.42 ul
25 ul

98°C 30s 1x
98°C 10s
70-55°C 30s
72°C 2m 40x
72°C 5m
4°C infinity 1x

Fragment # Name Mass (ng) Volume (ul)
1 pASKphaA 195.3 4.76
2 phaB 41 0.60
3 Termcat2 78.4 1.14
4 phaC 86.4 0.68
~400 7.14
6/20/09
E: Gel to check PCR
R: Correct band (faint)
C: Low efficiency, Use different method (Infusion kit or PCR with 2 fragments first)

6/22/09
LB Agar Plates with Chlorophenicol (CAM), anhydrotetracycline, Nile Red (NR)
stock plate
CAM 50 mg/ul 20 ug/ml
anhyd 2 mg/ml 150 ng/ml
NR 0.25 mg/ml 0.5 ug/ml

E: PCR with fragments 1 and 2 and different conditions (decreased annealing and extension times and number of cycles), Gel to check PCR

2x Phusion mix 12.5 ul
pASKphaA 4.76 ul
phaB 0.60 ul
H2O 7.14 ul
25 ul

98°C 30s 1x
98°C 10s
70-55°C 10s
72°C 1m 10s 20x
72°C 5m
4°C infinity 1x

R: No band/smear
C: Change conditions

6/23/09
E: Assembly PCR with different conditions (no slow ramp)

6/24/09
E: Gel to check PCR
R: Correct band (faint)
C: Do transformation with competent cells


6/24/09
Transformation with High Efficiency GC5 Competent Cells
1. Remove competent cells from -70°C and place on ice. Thaw for 5-10 min.
2. Gently mix cells by tapping tube.
3. Add 1-50 ng DNA (1 ul control) into 50 ul cells. Swirl pipette tip while dispensing DNA. Gently tap tube to mix.
4. Place tubes on ice for 30 min.
5. Heat-shock cells for 45 sec in 42°C (water) bath. Do not shake!
6. Add 450 ul RT SOC Medium to each transformation reaction.
7. Incubate at 37°C for 1 hr with shaking at 225-250 rpm.
8. Spread on LB agar plates containing appropriate antibiotic.
9. Incubate plates at 37°C overnight (12-16 hrs).

6/26/09
Pick a colony from a streaked selective plate to inoculate 10 ml of LB medium supplemented with the appropriate selection antibiotic. Incubate 12-18 hrs at 37°C while shaking at 200-250 rpm.

6/27/09
Harvest bacterial culture by centrifuging at 8000 rpm (6800xg) in microcentrifuge for 2 min at RT. Decant supernatant and remove remaining medium.

Purification/Mini prep
1. Resuspend pelleted cells in 250 ul Resuspension Solution. Vortex or pipet up and down until no cell clumps remain.
2. Add 250 Lysis Solution and mix thoroughly by inverting tube 4-6 times until solution becomes viscous and slightly clear. Do not incubate for more than 5 min to avoid denaturation of supercoiled plasmid DNA.
3. Add 350 ul Neutralization Solution and mix thoroughly by inverting tube 4-6 times.
4. Centrifuge for 5 min to pellet cell debris and chromosomal DNA.
5. Transfer supernatant to spin column by decanting or pipetting. Avoid disturbing or transferring white precipitate.
6. Centrifuge for 1 min. Discard flow-through and replace column in collection tube.
7. Add 500 ul Wash Solution to spin column. Centrifuge for 30-60s and discard flow-through.
8. Repeat step 7.
9. Centrifuge for 1 min to remove residual Wash Solution.
10. Transfer spin column into fresh 1.7 ml microcentrifuge tube. Add 50 ul Elution Buffer to center of spin column membrane. Do not touch pipette tip to membrane. Incubate 2 min at RT and centrifuge for 2 min.
Note: An additional elution step with Elution buffer or water will recover residual DNA from the membrane and increase overall yield by 10-20%.
11. Discard column and store purified plasmid DNA at -20°C.

6/29/09
E: Restriction digests, Gel to check digests

Digest 1
NdeI (FastDigest) 1 ul
SpeI (NEB) 1 ul
10x FastDigest buffer 2 ul
plasmid 1 ul (~100 ng)
H2O 15 ul
20 ul
Band Sizes/Lengths: 5 kb, 3 kb, 460 bp, (80bp)

Digest 2 (Did not do)
NdeI (FastDigest) 2 ul
10x FastDigest buffer 2 ul
plasmid 1 ul (~100 ng)
H2O 15 ul
20 ul
Band Sizes/Lengths: 5.4 kb, 3 kb

Digest 3
BamHI (FastDigest) 1 ul
XhoI (FastDigest) 1 ul
10x FastDigest buffer 2 ul
plasmid 1 ul (~100 ng)
H2O 15 ul
20 ul
Band Sizes/Lengths: 6.6 kb, 1.8 kb

Digest 4
BamHI (FastDigest) 2 ul
10x FastDigest buffer 2 ul
plasmid 1 ul (~100 ng)
H2O 15 ul
20 ul
Band Size/Length: 8.4 kb

R: Correct bands and sizes for plasmid 2 and digests 1, 3, and 4, correct band and size for plasmid 4
C: Do more tests on plasmid 2 such as sequencing to determine if plasmid is carryover, Try different primers

 



Advisors

Dr. Jingdong Tianjtian@duke.edu
Faisal Reza faisal.reza@duke.edu

Students

Anga.jpg Andrew Ang
andrew.ang@duke.edu
bio
Chienk.jpg Kevin Chien
kevin.chien@duke.edu
Faith.jpg Faith Kung
fk8@duke.edu

Faith Kung is a senior at Duke majoring in Biomedical Engineering with minors in Music Performance and Biology. She enjoys working in a lab. Besides academics, her hobbies include arts and crafts, dance, and figure skating. Faith is applying to PhD programs in Biomedical Science and hopes to pursue a career in scientific research and education. She is excited about attending the iGEM competition this year.

PrasadaS.jpg Sahil "Most Valuable Baller" Prasada
sahil.prasada@duke.edu

Sahil Prasada is a freshman at Duke. He plans to pursue medicine as a career. His interests lie in Detroit sports, tennis, and dancing. He is a member of the DBS Raas team on campus. He is currently in the Trinity School of the Arts and Sciences but is considering transferring to the Pratt School of Engineering. He hopes that the Detroit Lions may one day win the Superbowl. While waiting for this to occur, he will attend the iGEM competition and is looking forward to winning an award.

Quanm.jpg Maggie Jiayuan Quan
jq7@duke.edu
bio
Nicholas.jpg Nicholas Tang
nicholas.tang@duke.edu
bio
Zhup.jpg Peter Zhu
peter.zhu@duke.edu
Peter Zhu Is a freshman at Duke University and a North Carolina local. Though he's not sure yet what to do with his life, he thinks Biomedical Engineering and pre-Law is looking pretty good. When he's not busy with the routines of life, he is listening to the Billboard Top 100, playing Chopin Preludes, searching for new places to eat, playing tennis, studying poker, and gaming Starcraft/DoTA. Peter is a regular at Bail Hai Mongolian Grill, Lime and Basil Vietnamese Pho, and Five Guy's Burgers---bacon cheeseburger with all toppings of course.

About Duke University