Team:EPF-Lausanne/Analysis

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Density)
(Density)
Line 295: Line 295:
}
}
//--></script>
//--></script>
 +
 +
<p>
 +
<a href="javascript:ReverseDisplay('hs4')">Click here to show/hide</a>
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<div id="hs4" style="display:none;">
 +
<p>
In order to obtain the data for the volume from the log file we will again use the script ''namdstats.tcl'', which was already sourced. Type in a terminal window:
In order to obtain the data for the volume from the log file we will again use the script ''namdstats.tcl'', which was already sourced. Type in a terminal window:

Revision as of 11:17, 8 September 2009


Analysis of Equilibrium





Scripts

As this page is getting crowded, we created another page to explain all the scripts we wrote. The current page has some kind of step by step tutorials, but if you want fast informations, you better go to the script page.


Examples

Maxwell-Boltzmann Energy Distribution

Click here to show/hide

Energies

Click here to show/hide

Temperature distribution

Click here to show/hide

Density

Click here to show/hide

Pressure as a function of simulation time

In order to obtain the data for the pressure from the log file we will again use the script namdstats.tcl, which has been updated for the occasion. The file can be found here. Please rename to namdstats.tcl after download.

Here are the steps to use this script:

source namdstats.tcl
data_time DATA_NAME LOG_FILE

It will extract data from LOG_FILE, creating a DATA_NAME.dat containing values and time informations.

Available DATA_NAME can be: BOND, ANGLE, DIHED, IMPRP, ELECT, VDW, BOUNDARY, MISC, KINETIC, TOTAL, TEMP, TOTAL2, TOTAL3, TEMPAVG, PRESSURE, GPRESSURE, VOLUME, PRESSAVG, GPRESSAVG.

So, to extract pressure from our first simulation, the command is: data_time PRESSURE namd_log

Here is a small plot of pressure and temperature in function of time

1st run.jpg



RMSD for individual residues

We aim at finding the average RMSD over time for each residue in the protein using VMD.

1. We load the .psf and .dcd files obtained after the first round of simulation.


2. In the TkCon window type:

source residue_rmsd.tcl
set sel_resid [[atomselect top "protein and alpha"] get resid]

This will get all the residues number of all alpha-carbons in the protein. Since there is just one and only one α-carbon per residue, it is a good option.


3. Now we will calculate the RMSD values of all atoms in the newly created selection:

rmsd_residue_over_time top $sel resid

At the end of the calculation, we have a list of the avergae RMSD per residue (in the file residue_rmsd.dat)

Remark: we updated the script residue_rmsd.tcl to be able to specify on which frames the rsmd has to be computed. Please have a look on this wiki for a more up-to-date version of the file... Command is:
rmsd_residue_over_time top $sel resid FIRST_FRAME LAST_FRAME


4. In VMD, in Graphics → Representations, do the following actions:

  • create two replicates: protein and resname FMN in selected atoms
  • for the FMN, choose CPK as a drawing method
  • for the protein, choose tube as drawing method, and user as coloring method. Now click on the Trajectory tab, and in the Color Scale Data Range, type 0.40 and 1.00.
Vmd color.png

The protein is colored according to its average RMSD values. The residues displayed in blue are more mobile while the ones in red move less.

Here is a movie with the protein colored according to average RMSD values.

RMSD moving residues


5. Now we can plot the RMSD value per residue by typing in a Terminal window :

xmgrace residue rmsd.dat

We obtain the following picture:

RMSD CA per res.jpg



RMSD of residue within 3 angström of the FMN

Resid 3A.jpg


We can see that the residues that move the most are the residue number: 425, 451, 453



RMSD of residue within 6 angström of the FMN

Resid 6A.jpg

We can see that the residues that move the most are the residue number: 424, 425, 464, 468


Back to top




RMSD of selected atoms compared to initial position along time

This script was highly updated, please go to the script page if you encounter a problem!!!

Selections are not precise here!


We made a small TCL script to calculate RMSD from selected atoms compared to their initial position along timestep. The file can be found here. Please rename to Residue_rmsd_igem09.tcl after download.

Example to run the script:

load .dcd + .psf on VMD
source residue_rmsd_igem09.tcl
set sel_resid [[atomselect top "protein and alpha"] get resid]
rmsd_residue_over_time top $sel_resid 0 0

We tried to select only backbone from protein + FMN → change

set sel_resid [[atomselect top "backbone"] get resid]

The script was updated to be able to define reference frame and first frame were RMSD will be calculated. We usually don't need to compute RMSD during heating, for instance. RMSD takes a lot of time. In our first run 1 frame = 100 timesteps * 2 fs*timesteps^-1 = 200 fs

complete form for run is:

rmsd_residue_over_time top $sel_resid FIRST_FRAME REFERENCE_FRAME

For our first run, if we want to select only the 295°K NPT plateau, and set its first frame as reference, we have to launch:

rmsd_residue_over_time top $sel_resid 1115 1115

Here is how the script processes:

  • calculate how many frames are in .dcd
  • for each timestep, the script aligns (best fit) the backbone of the protein to the eference position to minimize RMDS. (Test: "and not mass 1,008000" == and noh was added in selection to remove hydrogen)
  • for each residue (selected by sel_resid), RMSD is computed and the sum of all RMSD (one for each residue) is stored for current timestep
  • script's output is data_rmsd.dat


Here is a fast graph of the output of the average RMSD of the atoms in function of time. It seems normal.

Rmsd.jpg


Here is what we got with FIRST_FRAME=1115 REFERENCE_FRAME=1115. Average=921.477, standard deviation=202.1708

RMSD plateau.jpg


FIRST_FRAME=0 REFERENCE_FRAME=0. The difference of the sum probably comes from the new selection of atoms from the backbone. We should compute an average value to normalize amplitude. (fluctuation is conserved, anyway) Average=781.3913, standard deviation=118.1393

RMSD COMPLETE RUN.jpg



Back to top



Salt bridges

As we wanted to redo the analysis from Schulten's article, we looked for salt bridges. VMD can easily compute this, it even propose an easy GUI. Standard configuration is just fine for now. You'll have a log file containing the list of nitrogen-oxygen susceptible of forming a salt bridge. You'll also get a file for each bridge containing the distance between both atoms along the simulation.

In the light state, we have 9 salt bridges witin the protein and 12 if we consider the protein and the flavin (use "protein or resname FMN" as selection).

ASP471-ARG467
GLU409-ARG442
FMN450-FMN450
ASP540-LYS544
ASP432-ARG442
FMN450-ARG451
GLU457-LYS489
GLU444-LYS485
ASP522-ARG521
ASP424-ARG451
GLU475-LYS533
FMN450-ARG467

Here is a plot for one of the bridges. We have to look for the max distance for a salt bridge.

Salt bridge.jpg


Back to top




RMSF

After changing the script [see here], we perform an interesting analysis from these 2 files. First, we have to correct the RMSF, that can be linked to beta factor using this equation:

Beta rmsf.jpg

If you plot beta factor and RMSF, you get such a thing. center‎

This is a 1 nanosecond NPT run at 300°K. We hope to see a RMSF curve identical to the beta factor. It should only be shifted higher because of the increased temperature. But having a similar tendency would mean our simulation show oscillations similar to what was observed during crystallography. This is really a quite nice validation of our run!


Back to top