Team:KULeuven/Project Results

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Project Results)
(Project Results)
Line 56: Line 56:
{|
{|
-
| [[Image:weakness.png|thumb|400px|Comparison of the blue light promoter (blue) to a standard promoter strength {{kulpart|I20260}} (orange) in RPU. The blue light promoter shows at least half the strength of the standard promoter, meaning it can be classified as a weak promoter]]
+
| [[Image:BLPresult1.png|thumb|380px|Comparison of the blue light promoter (blue) to a standard promoter strength {{kulpart|I20260}} (orange) in RPU. The blue light promoter shows at least half the strength of the standard promoter, meaning it can be classified as a weak promoter]]
|}
|}
{|
{|

Revision as of 21:38, 19 October 2009


Project Results

Our Results can be roughly divided in two sections, the biobrick assembly from starting parts in order to create our (test)-devices and secondly the characterizations of a part.

First and foremost we succesfully assembled the following biobricks and sent them to the registry:

Partnumber Description
Antisense key
Sam5 + rbs
virA
VirG
VirB
Blue light promotor
Ech+fcs
Blp + GFP
Blp + RFP
EF + terminator
EF+ promoter+ terminator
Sam5 +sam8
Sams + promoter
Sams + promoter + comt
Sams+ comt+ promoter en terminator
lock
Sam8 + RBS
Ech + rbs
Fcs + rbs


Furthermore, the blue light promoter was extensively characterized. The strength of the promoter was compared to a normal promoter and the effect of promoter strength on blue light irradiance was examined.

Comparison of the blue light promoter (blue) to a standard promoter strength (orange) in RPU. The blue light promoter shows at least half the strength of the standard promoter, meaning it can be classified as a weak promoter
Effect of blue light irradiance on promoter strength. Cells grown under blue light irradiance (blue) show a stronger expression compared to cells grown in the dark (grey)