Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:BSD

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 56: Line 56:
[[Image:BSDfinal.jpg|thumb|380px|left|alt=Burst Size Distribution| Burst Size Distribution obtained from the simulation Results of the Molecular Simulations.]]
[[Image:BSDfinal.jpg|thumb|380px|left|alt=Burst Size Distribution| Burst Size Distribution obtained from the simulation Results of the Molecular Simulations.]]
<br><br><br>
<br><br><br>
-
Without [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:Project#defense | defense system]] our simulated BSD has mean 176 and standard deviation 102. This distribution was created running 1000 simulations of the intracellular model.<br>
+
Without [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:KZM | kamikaze system]] our simulated BSD has mean 176 and standard deviation 102. This distribution was created running 1000 simulations of the intracellular model.<br>
-
We see that experimentally measured values fall within this distribution. The large variance seen by Delbrück and the dispersion in experimental values is congruent with our results (table 1).<br> Dispersion in our simulations its due only to stochastic fluctuations in ocurrence of chemical reactions.<br><br>
+
We see that experimentally measured values fall within 1 standard deviation of the distribution's mean. The large variance seen by Delbrück and the dispersion in experimental values is congruent with our results (table 1).<br> It's important to remember that the observed dispersion in our simulations its due only to stochastic fluctuations in ocurrence of chemical reactions.<br><br>
So using our model we can sample distributions for any of the biochemical species in the system and use those values to assemble more complex stochastic models as we did with the [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:CA | Cellular Automata]].<br>
So using our model we can sample distributions for any of the biochemical species in the system and use those values to assemble more complex stochastic models as we did with the [[Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:CA | Cellular Automata]].<br>

Revision as of 22:04, 21 October 2009


The Burst-Size Distribution


Content



The Burst Size Distribution


In 1939 Ellis and Delbrück obtained values which indicated an exceedingly wide variation of the burst sizes for different bacteriophages. In 1945 Delbrück published the first Burst-Size distribution using an improved technique for bacteriophage T1.

The reported values for the burst size of T7 are in the range 100-300, this values are used in many population models for bacteriophage infection [][][].

It is important to have a reliable simulation of the intracellular dynamics in order to generate values for the burst-size. Creating a Burst-Size distribution is one of the most important things of our work since it will be the link between the intracellular scale and the population scale simulations. The BSD is by no means the only distributions generated by our intracellular simulations, distributions for each species in the model are generated indeed.



T7 Reported Burst Size
WT Measured T7 BS Reference
266±16 Heineman 2007
130±50 Stanley 1989
260 De Paepe 2006
214 Sadowski 1973
300 Brock 1990}

Table1.Experimentally measured T7 Burst Size





Simulated BSD



Burst Size Distribution
Burst Size Distribution obtained from the simulation Results of the Molecular Simulations.




Without kamikaze system our simulated BSD has mean 176 and standard deviation 102. This distribution was created running 1000 simulations of the intracellular model.
We see that experimentally measured values fall within 1 standard deviation of the distribution's mean. The large variance seen by Delbrück and the dispersion in experimental values is congruent with our results (table 1).
It's important to remember that the observed dispersion in our simulations its due only to stochastic fluctuations in ocurrence of chemical reactions.

So using our model we can sample distributions for any of the biochemical species in the system and use those values to assemble more complex stochastic models as we did with the Cellular Automata.













Sensitivity Analysis for T7 mRNA half-life




Sensitivity Analysis for T7 mRNA average lifetime
Sensitivity analysis for the T7 mRNA half-life. For each value of the parameter we performed 1000 simulations of the molecular model and the mean was computed. Standard deviation bars are shown. .

Previous intracellar simulations for bacteriophage devolpment didn't take into account the half-life of the phage mRNA.
To answer the question of whether this parameter affects the Burst Size or not, we implemented a sensitivity analysis. The average half-life reported for early T7 messengers is ~6.5 min. (Yamada, 1975). We performed 1000 simulations of the molecular model for a wide range of half-life values.
The image on the left shows the results of the simulations, we observe the way in which the Burst Size is affected by the mRNA half-life time.
We observe a wide standard deviation in the distributions (vertical bars), this is consistent with existing experimental data.






















BSD using the Kamikaze System

Sensitivity Analysis for ribosome inactivarion rate
Sensitivity Analysis for the Ribosome Inactivarion Rate. We used simulations that include the action of toxine E3. Burst Size of 0 was obtained for rate in the range (10e-1,10e-4).



Results by Yin,2002 suggested an efficient way to reduce phage cycle efficieny: "...phage growth was found to be most sensitive to the host translation machinery, specifically, the level and elongation rate of the ribosomes."
We added to our Wild type Molecular Model the action of colicin E3 (rRNAsa): cleavage of rRNA of 16s subunit of the ribosome. we couldn't find the rate of this reaction in the literature so we decided to perform a sensitivity analysis: change the rate over a wide range of values and see wether the burst size is reduced significantly or not.
The image on the right show the results of the sensitivity analysis: Burst Size was reduced to 0 when the ribosome inactivation rate takes vales greater or equal than 10e-4.















References



  1. Thomas D. Brock. Emergence of Bacterial Genetics, 1990.
  2. Delbrück. Burst Size Distribution in the Growth of Bacterial Viruses(Bacteriophages). 1945
  3. Richard H. Heineman and James J. Bull . Testing Optimality with experimental evolution: Lysis Time in time . 2007
  4. De Paepe. Viruses Life History: Towards a Mechanistic Basis of a Trade-Off between Survival and Reproduction among Phage. 2006.
  5. Paul D. Sadowski. Suppression of a Mutation in Gene 3 of Bacteriophage T7 (T7 Endonuclease) by Mutations in Phage and Host Polynucleotide Ligase. 1973
  6. Yamada. Chemical Stability of Bacteriophage T7 Early mRNA. 1975