Team:Wash U/Biological Parts

From 2009.igem.org

Revision as of 20:34, 20 July 2009 by Tvs2 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Parts

Component	Description	Part/Accession #	Base Pairs	Plasmid	Resistance	Well
RBS	Ribosomal Binding Site	BBa_B0034	12	pSB1A2	Ampicillin	plate 1, 2M
Cph8	Red Light sensor	BBa_I15010	2,238	pSB2K3	Kanamycin	N/A
RFP	Red Fluorescent Protein	BBa_J04051	720			N/A
OmpR (E. coli)	description	NP_417864.1	720	pSB1T3	Tetracycline	N/A
Terminator	Stops Transcription	BBa_B0015	129	pSB1AK3	Ampicillin and Kanamycin	plate 1, 23L
OmpR + Terminator	description	sequence	916	pany-amp	Ampicillin	synthesized
OmpC promoter	description	BBa_R0082	108	pSB1A2	Ampicillin	plate 1, 16K
puc B/A	description	sequence	375	pSB1A3	Ampicillin	N/A
puc B	description	YP_353390	156	?	?	N/A
puc A	description	YP_353391	165	?	?	N/A
OmpC promoter+BA	description	sequence	539	pany-kana	Kanamycin	synthesized
Light Response System	description	BBa_M30109	4,333	?	Ampicillin	N/A
TetR repressible	description	BBa_J13002	74	pSB1A2	Ampicillin	plate 1, 13B
Green Fluorescent Protein	Marker for characterization	BBa_E0240	876	pSB1A2	Ampicillin	plate 1, 12M

Plasmids

Plasmid	Description	Base Pairs	Resistance	Copy Number
pSB1A2	BioBrick Vector	2,079	Ampicillin	high
pSB1K3		2,206	Kanamycin	high
pSB1A3	Assembly plasmid	2,157	Ampicillin	high
pSB2K3		4,425	Kanamycin	variable
pSB1T3	Assembly plasmid	2,463	Tetracycline	high
pSB1AK3	Assembly Plasmid	3,189	Ampicillin and Kanamycin	high
pANY
pRKCBC3			Tetracycline

Back To Top

Characterization

The first part of our characterization begins with the puc promoter. The puc promoter is what turns on the entire system naturally in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The puc promoter is what ultimately controls the number of LH2 light harvesting complexes, which is how our system will yield an increase in photosynthetic efficiency. It is important that we are able to compare the transcription rate of the puc promoter in the two systems so that we can determine exactly how much efficiency is gained by adding a red light sensor. By attaching Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) to the promoter we can quantify the rate of transcription by measuring the emittance of green light using a fluorescence spectrophotometer. We would expect to see more fluorescence with more transcription and vis versa.

The next step in our characterization of our synthetic red light response system is to analyze the phosphorylation of ompR in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. In our final system, we only want puc genes to be transcribed and expressed via the phosphorylation of ompR, not simply the puc promoter as it naturally occurs. By placing the ompR coding region downstream of the red light sensor and upstream of a terminator our modified system controls expression of the puc genes by the red light sensor in addition to the puc promoter. It should be impossible for the puc promoter to directly cause the transcription of puc genes due to the terminator, but instead, the puc genes must be activated via ompR phosphorylation. The end target of ompR transcription is the ompC promoter, located directly upstream of the puc genes. Placing GFP behind ompC tells us how often the promoter is transcribed and how often ompR is phoshorylated.

Part three of our characterization measures the effectiveness of the red light sensor in downregulating the phosphorylation of ompR. This setup is identical to that of part two except we have introduced the red light sensor. Now, the rate of ompR autophosphorylation will be halted by binding to a domain on the light-activated EnvZ kinase analogue. GFP is still attached to the end product, the ompC promoter. By comparing the fluorescence of GFP in this scenario compared with the second scenario the decrease in rate of phosphorylation should be apparent due to the activity of the red light sensor.

This is the final construct that will be our actual functioning model in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. This finished product will be compared to the wild type over various intensities of light and cell culture densities can be compared to see which strain, the wild type or the modified strain with the red light sensor was more efficient in harvesting light with varying intensities.

Back To Top

Modeling

Under Development