Team:Wisconsin-Madison

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 19: Line 19:
----
----
'''Ethanol vs. Bioelectricity'''
'''Ethanol vs. Bioelectricity'''
-
[[image: car.jpg|left|thumb|Driving on Biomass [[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1168885v1 1]] ]]A study conducted by Elliot Campbell of the University of California – Merced was released earlier this week that will have profound effects on world energy policies. The study modeled how far different types of cars could travel based on fuels acquired from the same area of land and biomass. The study considered two types of feedstock: corn and switchgrass, and different classes of cars: small car, midsize car, small SUV, and large SUV. The major finding was that biomass converted into electricity produced, on average, 81% more transportation miles and 108% more emissions offset compared to ethanol. The study criterion was based on miles per area cropland and greenhouse gas offset per cropland. In summary, electric means of converting biomass use a lot less land to produce the same amount of travel and did so while producing much less pollution.
+
[[image: car.jpg|left|250px|thumb|Driving on Biomass [[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1168885v1 1]] ]]A study conducted by Elliot Campbell of the University of California – Merced was released earlier this week that will have profound effects on world energy policies. The study modeled how far different types of cars could travel based on fuels acquired from the same area of land and biomass. The study considered two types of feedstock: corn and switchgrass, and different classes of cars: small car, midsize car, small SUV, and large SUV. The major finding was that biomass converted into electricity produced, on average, 81% more transportation miles and 108% more emissions offset compared to ethanol. The study criterion was based on miles per area cropland and greenhouse gas offset per cropland. In summary, electric means of converting biomass use a lot less land to produce the same amount of travel and did so while producing much less pollution.
One example tested a small SUV run on switchgrass. One acre of switchgrass converted into bioelectricity allowed the car to travel 22,530 kilometers on the highway while the switchgrass converted into liquid ethanol only allowed the small SUV to travel 14,480 kilometers on the highway. Read more about this study in the paper you can down load [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1168885v1 here].
One example tested a small SUV run on switchgrass. One acre of switchgrass converted into bioelectricity allowed the car to travel 22,530 kilometers on the highway while the switchgrass converted into liquid ethanol only allowed the small SUV to travel 14,480 kilometers on the highway. Read more about this study in the paper you can down load [http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1168885v1 here].
Line 28: Line 28:
----
----
-
[[image:2008win.gif|left|150px]]
+
[[image:2008win.gif|left|thumb|120px|Accepting Award]]
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>

Revision as of 16:12, 5 June 2009



News

What is iGEM?


Wisconsin Updates


May 18, 2009


Finals are finished and our summer has begun! Time for research.


May 7, 2009


Ethanol vs. Bioelectricity

Driving on Biomass [1]
A study conducted by Elliot Campbell of the University of California – Merced was released earlier this week that will have profound effects on world energy policies. The study modeled how far different types of cars could travel based on fuels acquired from the same area of land and biomass. The study considered two types of feedstock: corn and switchgrass, and different classes of cars: small car, midsize car, small SUV, and large SUV. The major finding was that biomass converted into electricity produced, on average, 81% more transportation miles and 108% more emissions offset compared to ethanol. The study criterion was based on miles per area cropland and greenhouse gas offset per cropland. In summary, electric means of converting biomass use a lot less land to produce the same amount of travel and did so while producing much less pollution.

One example tested a small SUV run on switchgrass. One acre of switchgrass converted into bioelectricity allowed the car to travel 22,530 kilometers on the highway while the switchgrass converted into liquid ethanol only allowed the small SUV to travel 14,480 kilometers on the highway. Read more about this study in the paper you can down load here.


April 23, 2009


Accepting Award



The 2008 Wisconsin iGEM Team has recently won the grand price in the Nelson Institute’s Climate Leadership Challenge. Their project increased the efficiency of Biofuels and is titled "Cellulosic Biofuels". Half of the $20,000 they earned will be donated to fund the 2009 Wisconsin iGEM Team! Check out the entire article in our local newspaper or look at their iGEM Wiki for more information: Wisconsin 2008







Visit http://www.ipligence.com