EPF-Lausanne/11 September 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Results of the characterization)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
<input type="button" name="lien" value="10 September 2009"
<input type="button" name="lien" value="10 September 2009"
onClick="self.location.href='https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/10_September_2009'">
onClick="self.location.href='https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/10_September_2009'">
-
<input type="button" name="lien" value="14 September 2009"  
+
<input type="button" name="lien" value="17 September 2009"  
-
onClick="self.location.href='https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/14_September_2009'">
+
onClick="self.location.href='https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/17_September_2009'">
</p>
</p>
</form>
</form>
Line 59: Line 59:
===Read out 1 characterization===
===Read out 1 characterization===
To summarize our results, we did the following graphic :
To summarize our results, we did the following graphic :
-
[[Image:RO1final.jpg‎|center|RO1 final plot]]
+
[[Image:RO1final.jpg‎|center|thumb|upright=4|RO1 final plot]]
We can say that Read Out 1 is characterized, it shows exactly the answer we would expect : if we add TRP, there is a significant decrease in RFP expression.
We can say that Read Out 1 is characterized, it shows exactly the answer we would expect : if we add TRP, there is a significant decrease in RFP expression.
Line 68: Line 68:
<html><center><a href="https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/10_September_2009"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/6/61/Flèche_gauche.png/70px-Flèche_gauche.png"></a>   
<html><center><a href="https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/10_September_2009"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/6/61/Flèche_gauche.png/70px-Flèche_gauche.png"></a>   
-
<a href="https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/14_September_2009"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/5/5e/Fleche_droite.png/70px-Fleche_droite.png"></a></center></html>  
+
<a href="https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/17_September_2009"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/5/5e/Fleche_droite.png/70px-Fleche_droite.png"></a></center></html>  
</div><div CLASS="epfl09bouchon"></div>
</div><div CLASS="epfl09bouchon"></div>

Latest revision as of 12:48, 4 October 2009

Contents

11 September 2009





Wet Lab

O.D. for the Trp K.O. strains

For the competent cells !

After 5p.m. :

JRG1046 : 1.35. JRG465 : 0.85. JW4356-2 : 1.64. JW4356-2 (Kana) : 1.57.

For today we drop the experiment, we are too far from 0.6. We will do it on Monday.

Results of the characterization

RO2-BB #1, all clones were illuminated :

RO2-BB#1 plot

We have induction (repression repressed...) from LovTAP, we have to investigate further to be sure it is what we want.

Tryptophan concentration experiment on RO2 :

RO2#4 TRP plot

All the clones react in the same way, here it is the graph for RO2#4. It seems we have an increase until somewhere between 2ul and 4 ul (in 50 ul of culture, TRP : 4.25 g/L).

RO2#5

RO2#5 plot

RO2#10

RO2#10 plot

RO1-BB didn't respond.

RO2#4, influence of TRP and ATC

File:RO24TRPATC.jpg
RO2#4 TRP ATC plot

Nicolas ce graph n'est pas dans ce que tu nous a envoyé, est-ce que tu peux le rajouter stp ???

Read out 1 characterization

To summarize our results, we did the following graphic :

RO1 final plot

We can say that Read Out 1 is characterized, it shows exactly the answer we would expect : if we add TRP, there is a significant decrease in RFP expression.

People in the lab

Mélanie, Caroline, Basile, Nicolas