"
Team:Aberdeen Scotland/parameters/invest 5
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Nick Smart (Talk | contribs) (New page: {{:Team:Aberdeen_Scotland/css}} {{:Team:Aberdeen_Scotland/header2}} = The Amended Model = The model we now look at is the final step in our progression. We take a system with constitut...) |
Nick Smart (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The model we now look at is the final step in our progression. We take a system with constitutive production of LuxR and have LuxI on a feedback loop using a weak Luxbox. | The model we now look at is the final step in our progression. We take a system with constitutive production of LuxR and have LuxI on a feedback loop using a weak Luxbox. | ||
| - | [[Image:Qs invest 4.jpg]] | + | [[Image:Qs invest 4.jpg|center|300px]] |
This allows us to use the literature value of K<sub>P</sub> while still getting good results. We see in the next few plots that the values of K<sub>CI</sub> and K<sub>TetR</sub> are very robust in this model: | This allows us to use the literature value of K<sub>P</sub> while still getting good results. We see in the next few plots that the values of K<sub>CI</sub> and K<sub>TetR</sub> are very robust in this model: | ||
| + | [[Image:Amended Model 1.jpg|center|700px]] | ||
{{:Team:Aberdeen_Scotland/footer}} | {{:Team:Aberdeen_Scotland/footer}} | ||
Revision as of 11:00, 10 August 2009
University of Aberdeen - Pico Plumber
iGEM 2009
The Amended Model
The model we now look at is the final step in our progression. We take a system with constitutive production of LuxR and have LuxI on a feedback loop using a weak Luxbox.
This allows us to use the literature value of KP while still getting good results. We see in the next few plots that the values of KCI and KTetR are very robust in this model:
