Team:Heidelberg/Project SaO
From 2009.igem.org
(→Outlook and summary) |
|||
(59 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<html><body id="project"><body></html> | <html><body id="project"><body></html> | ||
{| | {| | ||
- | |-valign="top" border="0" | + | |-valign="top" border="0" style="margin-left: 2px;" |
- | |width="650px" style="padding: 0 20px | + | |width="650px" style="padding: 0 15px 15px 20px; background-color:#ede8e2"| |
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
- | + | ='''Outlook and Summary'''= | |
+ | The urge in establishing manipulable eukaryotic systems has posed much pressure on the development of methods to help understand and characterize eukaryotic gene regulation. Those methods go beyond the already rather sophisticated methodology still being established in prokaryotes to investigate and thereafter engineer these cells as needed [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_SaO#References|[1]]]. For one thing, the design of promoters exclusively responsive to one transcription factor (TF) within eukaryotic cells could certainly help improve our understanding of the key components of one pathway or the other, while eliminating the cross-talk often observed with many naturally occurring promoters. Such promoters have often posed a challenge to researchers studying signal transduction in eukaryotic systems because of the different types of TFs that a single regulatory element can bind, and a single TF having multiple target regulatory regions [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_SaO#References|[2]]]. With the emerging of systematized research and attempts for modeling biological systems, the availability of data with minimal experimental variability and highly accurate experimental conditions has also contributed to the need for such finely-tuned promoters. Once such exclusive promoters could be available and methods for their characterization established, it is not so hard to imagine the revolutionary effect they could have on eukaryotic research. Some of many applications could be: | ||
+ | {| style="background-color:#ede8e2;" | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | [[Image:HD09_GFPmchr_PM.jpg|thumb|left|350px|<div style="text-align:justify;">'''Figure 1: GFP and mCherry localizing to the plasma membrane might serve as output in an assay cell line'''</div>]] | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | *Understanding disease within a network context. | ||
- | + | *High-accuracy studying of signaling transduction pathways. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | *Designing better experiments to understand noisy genetic control in eukaryotes. | |
- | + | *Selective protein expression in target cells. | |
- | + | *Combinatorial gene therapy. | |
- | + | *Metabolic engineering. | |
- | + | *Building fine-tuned logic gates in cells. | |
+ | |} | ||
- | + | <!--A step further, but within context of our attempt to develop an array of promoters that could help in studying eukaryotic intracellular networks, the thought to provide a tool to help visualize such interactions was of importance.--> | |
+ | A high-level application of synthetic promoters that lies close at hand is the development of a <span style="font-size:5mm;">"cell-based drug screening assay"</span>. Such an assay is based upon a cell line which is stably transfected with a multitude of promoters responsive to a variety of pathways. Each promoter would be linked to a unique output signal (see below). This cell line could be stimulated with a variety of drug candidates, and the molecular effect of each drug would directly be visualized. The availability of such a cell line would greatly accelerate the pace of drug discovery and pharmacology alike. We have created all the parts and knowledge required for such an assay, and would only need to assemble it. | ||
- | + | <!--Advances in microscopy and the availability of a myriad of fluorescent proteins (FP) have made their utilization a very attractive option. However, because of the overlap of the spectra of many fluorescent proteins, the use of several FPs together in the same sample while avoiding leakage from one channel to another in many microscopes is a limiting factor in the total number of promoters, and thus pathways, that can be visualized with such an approach . To circumvent such a limitation, the idea to use a small number of fluorescent proteins together with a family of intracellular targeting sequences to which they could be linked was proposed. By assigning different fluorescent proteins to distinct intracellular sorting signal, not only is the variability dependent on color alone, but both colour and localization. For example with two fluorescent proteins alone, one could investigate only two promoters concurrently, however with the same two proteins and three localization signal to which each could be targeted, six different promoters could be studied together, where a green plasma membrane and a green nucleus would reflect the activity of two different promoters without interfering with the visualization of each other.--> | |
- | :< | + | Over the last three months we have been able to devise two independent methods to <span style="font-size:5mm;">design eukaryotic promoters</span> of desired selectivity and strength. The two methods referred to are based on different principles, one being a biochemical method [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Synthetic_promoters#Results|(RA-PCR)]] and the other an ''in silico'' method [[Team:Heidelberg/HEARTBEAT|(HEARTBEAT)]]. Noteworthy is that the ''in silico'' method resulted in a tool that not only helps design promoters of required selectivity, but also helps evaluate the quality of promoters as well as provide online users (of our wiki) to use the same principle to design their own through an elegant Graphical User Interface [http://igem.bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de/embperl/GUI04/index.epl (GUI)]. Also, we propose ways to [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Synthetic_promoters#M-RA-PCR|combine]] the two methods. By applying these methods, we have been able to generate a [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Synthetic_promoters#Generation_of_a_library_of_constitutive_promoters|library of constitutive promoters]] of varying strengths as well as a selection of specific promoters. |
+ | [[Image:HD09_ER2.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Figure 2: GFP localizing to the ER might serve as output in an assay cell line]] | ||
+ | For <span style="font-size:6mm;">output</span>, we suggest using a variety of fluorescent proteins (with non-overlapping spectra) coupled to localization tags. We were able to provide two FPs (GFP and mCherry) as well as four localization sequences (1x [[Team:Heidelberg/Eukaryopedia#Sar-1|Endoplasmic reticulum]]; 1x [[Team:Heidelberg/Eukaryopedia#NLS|Nucleus]]; 2x [[Team:Heidelberg/Eukaryopedia#GPI|Plasma membrane]]). We show that combining our FPs with our localization sequences works by using the [http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/45139 BBb_2 proposal], and thus provide future users with the possibility to visualize at least 6 different promoters simultaneously. | ||
- | + | We also established methods for promoter [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Measurement|<span style="font-size:5mm;">measurement</span>]] in eukaryotes utilizing microscopy, flow cytometry (FACS) and qRT-PCR. Promoter activity was not measured by microscopy before; we established this technique in order to be able to measure protein levels in different compartments and thus make the output legible. <!--determine the activity of the promoters developed utilizing both approaches in more than one mammalian cell line, besides providing [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Measurement#A promoter measurement kit for use in mammalian systems|measurement and normalization devices]], as well as a device that allows the integration of any Biobrick-β (BBb)-compatible block in a plasmid and its transfection into eukaryotic cells in a working form. All together, a standard method to characterize any promoter using such parts was established and [[Team:Heidelberg/Project_Measurement#Two units for promoter activity in mammalian cells|units]] describing promoter strength (as measured using these methods) were also defined.--> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | <!--As a further attempt, we tried to establish a [[Team:Heidelberg/stables|cell line]] that overcomes the variability in measurements caused by drawbacks of transient transfection by allowing the stable integration of inserts at a predetermined integration site in the genome of the cell line in use. Such an approach helps eliminating epigenetic variability in gene expression control. Although, this part was never realized in its final form, we are proud to have introduced the value of such a concept to the emerging field of eukaryotic promoter research and our own experimental observations have further strengthened our belief in the need of such a cell line in the future.--> | |
+ | Not only to overcome challenges for promoter measurement, but also to lay the foundations for the proposed drug-screening assay as well as any other synthetic biology idea in mammalian cells, we emphasize the importance of [[Team:Heidelberg/stables|stable cell line creation]]. | ||
- | + | At the end, we are proud to say that we have introduced many of the concepts, methods and tools that could serve as the basis for all other attempts in the engineering of eukaryotic gene regulatory systems. <!--Not only have we allowed the chance for many of the researchers in many biological and medical fields to enhance the selectivity of their promoters, but also helped develop the devices necessary for further characterization with the technologies available for those working in the life- and biosciences today.--> Not neglecting the need for further improvement, with such a collection of tools available, the ideas of selective protein and gene therapy, metabolic engineering, stem cell manipulation and better intracellular network modeling do not seem too far away. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
- | + | [1] Venter M. Synthetic promoters: genetic control through ''cis'' engineering. ''Trends in Plant Science'' '''12''': 118-124 (2007). | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | [2] Carey M., Smale S. T., Hughes H., Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes: Concepts, Strategies and Techniques. New York:CSHL, p. 18-25 (2000). | |
+ | |width="250px" style="padding: 0 20px 15px 15px; background-color:#d8d5d0"| | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 22:33, 21 October 2009
Outlook and SummaryThe urge in establishing manipulable eukaryotic systems has posed much pressure on the development of methods to help understand and characterize eukaryotic gene regulation. Those methods go beyond the already rather sophisticated methodology still being established in prokaryotes to investigate and thereafter engineer these cells as needed [1]. For one thing, the design of promoters exclusively responsive to one transcription factor (TF) within eukaryotic cells could certainly help improve our understanding of the key components of one pathway or the other, while eliminating the cross-talk often observed with many naturally occurring promoters. Such promoters have often posed a challenge to researchers studying signal transduction in eukaryotic systems because of the different types of TFs that a single regulatory element can bind, and a single TF having multiple target regulatory regions [2]. With the emerging of systematized research and attempts for modeling biological systems, the availability of data with minimal experimental variability and highly accurate experimental conditions has also contributed to the need for such finely-tuned promoters. Once such exclusive promoters could be available and methods for their characterization established, it is not so hard to imagine the revolutionary effect they could have on eukaryotic research. Some of many applications could be:
A high-level application of synthetic promoters that lies close at hand is the development of a "cell-based drug screening assay". Such an assay is based upon a cell line which is stably transfected with a multitude of promoters responsive to a variety of pathways. Each promoter would be linked to a unique output signal (see below). This cell line could be stimulated with a variety of drug candidates, and the molecular effect of each drug would directly be visualized. The availability of such a cell line would greatly accelerate the pace of drug discovery and pharmacology alike. We have created all the parts and knowledge required for such an assay, and would only need to assemble it.
For output, we suggest using a variety of fluorescent proteins (with non-overlapping spectra) coupled to localization tags. We were able to provide two FPs (GFP and mCherry) as well as four localization sequences (1x Endoplasmic reticulum; 1x Nucleus; 2x Plasma membrane). We show that combining our FPs with our localization sequences works by using the [http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/45139 BBb_2 proposal], and thus provide future users with the possibility to visualize at least 6 different promoters simultaneously. We also established methods for promoter measurement in eukaryotes utilizing microscopy, flow cytometry (FACS) and qRT-PCR. Promoter activity was not measured by microscopy before; we established this technique in order to be able to measure protein levels in different compartments and thus make the output legible. Not only to overcome challenges for promoter measurement, but also to lay the foundations for the proposed drug-screening assay as well as any other synthetic biology idea in mammalian cells, we emphasize the importance of stable cell line creation. At the end, we are proud to say that we have introduced many of the concepts, methods and tools that could serve as the basis for all other attempts in the engineering of eukaryotic gene regulatory systems. Not neglecting the need for further improvement, with such a collection of tools available, the ideas of selective protein and gene therapy, metabolic engineering, stem cell manipulation and better intracellular network modeling do not seem too far away. References[1] Venter M. Synthetic promoters: genetic control through cis engineering. Trends in Plant Science 12: 118-124 (2007). [2] Carey M., Smale S. T., Hughes H., Transcriptional Regulation in Eukaryotes: Concepts, Strategies and Techniques. New York:CSHL, p. 18-25 (2000). |