"
Team:Imperial College London/Autoinduction
From 2009.igem.org
JamesField (Talk | contribs) (→Rationale) |
JamesField (Talk | contribs) (→Rationale) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
=Rationale= | =Rationale= | ||
| - | Before embarking on the creation of an autoinduction switch we reviewed a number of possible alternatives. A genetically encoded timer was initially considered however these | + | Before embarking on the creation of an autoinduction switch we reviewed a number of possible alternatives. A genetically encoded timer was initially considered however these present a number of considerable problems. Firstly, existing genetic timers are unable to provide a long enough delay and secondly, they are liable to fall out of phase. By using our growth media as an imput signal, we can sure that a greater proportion of cells commence <b>Module 2</b> at the same time. |
Revision as of 20:26, 19 October 2009
Please delete as completed.
Autoinduction feedback from todays session.
1) Mention the purpose of AI - No timer because...
2) Don't link to the temporal control page here.
3) Have a rationale section.
4) Add what teams can reuse from this module.
5) Have a conclusion of the page at the end - couple of lines.
Contents |
Module Integration - Autoinduction
Overview
The autoinduction process switches on Module 2 following the accumulation of a predetermined concentration of polypeptide. The term 'autoinduction' was chosen as the flipping of this switch is triggered by the chemical composition of the media in which our chassis is grown. Thus the 'on signal' orginates from inside the system: hence 'autoinduction'.
Rationale
Before embarking on the creation of an autoinduction switch we reviewed a number of possible alternatives. A genetically encoded timer was initially considered however these present a number of considerable problems. Firstly, existing genetic timers are unable to provide a long enough delay and secondly, they are liable to fall out of phase. By using our growth media as an imput signal, we can sure that a greater proportion of cells commence Module 2 at the same time.
Initiation
Module 2 is triggered by a rise in levels of cyclic Adenosine Mono Phosphate (cAMP). This is because cAMP facilitates the dimerisation of the transcription factor CRP which induces transcription downstream of the PcstA promoter. The rise in cAMP is correlated with a fall in levels of the primary carbon source (glucose). Thus, by controlling the initial amount of glucose present in the system, we achieve a timer function for the start of Module 2.
About Module 2 temporal control.
Results
The first of our diauxic growth models is a cybernetic model developed by Kompala et al [1]. This model shows that glucose (S1) is used up before the secondary carbon source (S2). During this phase, the population (X) is in exponential grow until glucose (S1) runs out. This is followed by a stationary growth phase, and finally the population enters a second exponential growth phase as they start uptaking the secondary carbon source (S2). Another model was developed by Keasling [2] that takes into account the dynamics of the lactose operon. //Include a nice diauxic growth curve from the lab
About the models and simulations!</i>
