Team:Kyoto/CiC/Results
From 2009.igem.org
(→sig-GFP expression in HeLa) |
(→Result of Subgoal A) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
===Result of Subgoal A=== | ===Result of Subgoal A=== | ||
- | + | ====Confirmation of function of TAT-liposome==== | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
===Result of Subgoal B=== | ===Result of Subgoal B=== |
Revision as of 14:50, 21 October 2009
- Home
- Cells in Cells
- Results & Discussion
Results & Discussion
Result of Subgoal A
Confirmation of function of TAT-liposome
Result of Subgoal B
Result of Subgoal C
sig-GFP expression in HeLa
To confirm the function of the signal sequence for importing protein into mitochondria, we compared the expressioin pattern of sig-GFP or GFP with mitotracker signal. The GFP signal was detected throughout the cell except for the black granules in the cytoplasm or the nuclear, while sig-GFP signal showed the string-like pattern in the cytoplasm. The black granules in the cytoplasm observed in the GFP-expressing cell were stained by mitotracker, and the result indicated that the GFP was normally eliminated from mitochondria (Fig. NUMBER, GFP and mitotracker merged). In case of sig-GFP, mitochondria stained by a mitotracker and the GFP signal showed almost the same pattern. the yellow color in the merge images (Fig. Number, sig-GFP and mitotracker merged) suggested that the sig-GFP and mitochondria were colocalized in the HeLa cell. We, consequently, our constructed signal sequence has the function of importing protein into mitochondria as expected.
Figure Caption: Conforcal microscopic images of GFP or sig-GFP transfected cells. The image lines titled "mitotracker(+)" indicated the samples was stained by mitotracker. The columns showed the mitotracker, GFP, and merged images from left, respectively.